Contracture release with local flaps and Z-plasty

Overview

A burn scar contracture is a band of dense scar that shortens across a joint or a mobile feature and pulls it out of position. When the scar crosses a flexion crease, motion is lost; when it crosses the eyelid, mouth, or neck, the feature is distorted and function is impaired. The hand illustrates the stakes: although it is only about 3% of the body surface, a burned hand is a major injury because the functional consequences are out of proportion to the area involved ^[10]. Contractures are common and difficult to treat, and despite decades of preventive effort they continue to occur ^[11].

The aim of release surgery is to preserve, restore, and maintain function and appearance so the patient can recover a social life ^[1]. Release is not a single operation but a family of techniques united by one sequence: divide the contracting band, then close the defect that the division creates. The choice of closure is the central surgical decision. Where the band is narrow and the surrounding skin is lax, the defect can be closed by rearranging local tissue, which is the role of the Z-plasty and its variants. Where division leaves a true skin deficit, the defect must be resurfaced with a skin graft or imported with a flap.

This page covers the established postburn contracture as a reconstructive problem and the spectrum of release techniques anchored by local flaps and Z-plasty. No single procedure cures a burn contracture, and the literature offers no consensus on which technique to use when ^[12]. The page describes how surgeons match technique to contracture and what the comparative evidence shows.

Epidemiology

Burn scar contractures are common, but the reported burden varies widely with how and when they are counted. A systematic review found the prevalence at hospital discharge ranged from 38% to 54%, falling with longer time after burn ^[2]. Across the broader literature the reported incidence of scar contracture spans 5% to 40% ^[13]. The variation reflects differences in definitions, measurement, and follow-up rather than a single true rate.

Several factors predispose to contracture. Contractures are more likely after more severe burns, flame burns, and burns crossing the cervical spine and the upper extremity, and they are more common in children and in female patients ^[2]. A literature review of risk factors for major joint contractures found that the evidence behind many accepted predictors is surprisingly thin ^[17]. Children carry a higher risk than adults: in one series the incidence of contractures was 7.8% in pediatric patients versus 2.0% in adults despite comparable burn size ^[9].

Graft choice at the time of wound closure also influences later contracture. In a 10-year pediatric hand-burn review, the overall incidence of contracture was 27% (34 of 126) with split-thickness grafts versus 2% (1 of 45) with full-thickness grafts ^[14]. More than 95% of burns occur in low- and middle-income countries, where access to basic health care is limited ^[16].

Classification

Several anatomic classification systems exist, each built to guide the choice of release technique at a particular site. For postburn extension contractures of the metacarpophalangeal joints in children, a classification based on the degree of passive flexion stratifies severity and predicts the response to reconstruction ^[18]. Axillary contractures are classified by whether scarring is limited to a fold or extends into the adjacent and hair-bearing skin, with a matched procedure for each type ^[19]. Foot contractures have been described across a graded spectrum from mild to mutilated, with the degree of involvement dictating the method ^[20].

The recurring principle across these schemes is the distinction between a linear scar band with otherwise lax adjacent skin and a broad contracture in which the skin itself is deficient. That anatomic distinction, more than any single named system, drives whether local tissue rearrangement or imported tissue is required.

Assessment

Assessment establishes whether a true contracture exists, how much length must be regained, and which technique can supply it. Range of motion at the affected joint is the central measure, and the surface area of scar to be released can be estimated from how much additional skin length is needed to complete the desired arc of motion ^[21]. Skin recruitment during movement correlates with available range of motion, which underlies the use of cutaneous functional units to plan where length must be added ^[23].

A practical limitation is that contracture measurement is poorly standardized. A survey of burn clinicians found a lack of consensus on the methods and tools used to measure scar contracture, and the methods in routine use are rarely checked for reliability ^[22]. The functional cost can be quantified: motion-analysis of axillary contractures showed measurable losses in shoulder and trunk movement during activities of daily living ^[56]. Preoperative documentation of the deficit at the specific joint is what allows the surgeon to choose between lengthening local tissue and importing new tissue.

Management

Surgical intervention follows the reconstructive ladder, moving from the simplest adequate technique toward more complex ones as the contracture demands ^[24]. Each site is evaluated separately, weighing surgical and conservative options against one another rather than applying a fixed method ^[25]. The governing decision is whether the released defect can be closed with adjacent tissue or whether new skin must be supplied.

Operative technique

Release begins by dividing the contracting band across the line of tension. A bloodless operative field improves both visualization and the accuracy of release. This can be achieved with a tourniquet or with tumescent infiltration; in a comparison of one-per-mil tumescent technique against tourniquet in burn hand contracture surgery, the tourniquet produced clear operative fields more often (35 versus 5 bloodless fields) ^[42]. The tumescent technique nonetheless achieves a largely clear field on its own: one-per-mil solution produced totally bloodless or minimally bleeding fields in 77% of upper-extremity cases ^[39]. When tumescent infiltration is used without a tourniquet, an interval of about 25 minutes before incision substantially improves operative-field visibility ^[40]. Beyond visualization, the tumescent approach has functional advantages at release: in a randomized trial in children, tumescent release produced better graft take, lower pain scores, and lower analgesic consumption than tourniquet release ^[41], and a separate randomized comparison found higher early graft take with tumescent technique ^[5].

After division, the defect is closed by the method matched to the contracture, as described below.

Local flaps and Z-plasty

When adjacent skin is lax, the released defect is closed by rearranging local tissue, and the Z-plasty is the standard technique for this. Even previously burned skin can serve as a random cutaneous local flap in pediatric burn reconstruction, which expands the local-tissue options where unburned skin is scarce ^[26]. The Z-plasty is a highly versatile standard maneuver of reconstructive burn surgery ^[4]. Its functions are to elongate tissue along the axis of the scar, to disperse the scar, and to realign it within relaxed skin tension lines ^[28]. When tissue is limited, opposing Z-plasties can be used, and a series of linked Z-plasties can elongate tissue over a longer distance through smaller individual incisions ^[4].

Multi-flap variants extend the principle to wider bands. Five-flap (jumping-man) plasty and double Z-plasty are both used for web-space and digital contractures, and comparative work favors the five-flap design in selected settings: five-flap Z-plasty improved the abduction angle and slope angle more than double Z-plasty for interdigital web contractures ^[30], and it achieved a superior rate of band elongation and better finger function for linear digital flexion contractures ^[31]. For parallel contracture bands, a dual opposing five-flap Z-plasty has been described as a purpose-built modification ^[32]. Larger multi-flap designs extend the reach further: a clinical series of seven-flap plasty across the neck, axilla, cubital fossa, hand, perineum, popliteal fossa, and foot achieved immediate length gains ranging from 60% to 233% (averaging 105%), though the realized gain depends on lateral laxity, flap number, tip angle, and anatomic region ^[29]. Subcutaneous pedicle rhomboid flaps offer another local option for long, linear, or wide bands, lengthening the band by relaxing incisions and closing the resulting defect with a reliable broad-pedicled flap whose necrosis is rare ^[33][34].

A perforator at the base of a local flap improves its vascularity and versatility ^[3]. Perforator-based interposition flaps were found to be a reliable and versatile technique for broad scar contractures ^[35]. Fasciocutaneous flaps avoid the skin-graft contraction that follows simple cross-cutting and grafting ^[36]. Where local laxity is genuinely absent, local rearrangement reaches its limit, and the defect is treated as a skin deficit.

Resurfacing the skin deficit

When release leaves a true skin deficit, the defect is resurfaced with a skin graft or an imported flap. Full-thickness grafts and split-thickness grafts have both been used after palmar release; in long-term pediatric follow-up, split-thickness grafts gave comparable function without requiring more operations and were less deforming ^[37]. Skin grafting is a simple, reliable, and safe method for covering the post-release defect ^[38]. The trade-off is durability: grafted releases are prone to recontraction, which is the basis for preferring flaps where they are feasible.

Timing

Whether to wait for scar maturation before releasing has been challenged. In pediatric axillary contractures, waiting for scars to mature before performing release was found to be unnecessary ^[43]. Timing instead turns on function and the threat to the feature; reconstruction to correct functional impairment is often needed before maturation is complete, weighing functional, aesthetic, and psychological factors for each patient ^[44]. For threatened structures such as the eyelid, early release and grafting is the treatment of choice in children and young adults with third-degree eyelid burns ^[52].

When local and grafted options are exhausted

For complex contractures where conventional options are inadequate, free tissue transfer extends the range. A systematic review of free flap reconstruction in burns encompassed 396 microsurgical reconstructions across varied anatomic regions for both primary and secondary reconstruction ^[45][6]. Free tissue transfer is rarely indicated in burns but can play a pivotal role in well-selected cases, with success contingent on patient selection, timing, and perioperative care ^[46][45]. Its most common complications are partial flap necrosis acutely and hematoma in the non-acute period ^[45].

Complications

Recurrence is the defining complication of contracture release. Recurrence rates are high and depend heavily on the method of closure and the anatomic site. Across a meta-analysis of microsurgical (flap-based) reconstruction, contractures resolved in 98.9% of pedicled and 90.1% of free-flap reconstructions, with recurrence at only 1.8% of pedicled-flap sites ^[6]. Flap-based reconstruction is associated with lower recurrent-contracture rates than grafting ^[6]. By contrast, grafted releases recur far more often: an elbow-and-shoulder series from a low-resource setting documented a 52% recurrence of postburn contractures ^[15], and in children treated for foot equinus with external fixation, recurrence reached 69% across all feet and 74% for equinus deformities specifically ^[47].

Recurrence after grafting tracks with graft behavior and after-care. In one foot-contracture series the overall recurrence rate was 15% and was not affected by whether split- or full-thickness grafts were used ^[48], underscoring that immobilization and rehabilitation, not graft thickness alone, drive the result. Inadequate immobilization and overgranulation have been identified as contributors to recurrence ^[8]. Beyond recurrence, flap-based release carries technical risks: distal flap necrosis is a recognized hazard of random-pattern flaps over poorly vascularized scar ^[49], and tissue expansion in the pediatric burn patient carries a high complication rate ^[50].

Special Considerations

Children are a distinct population. They recur during growth because normal skin enlarges while contracted scar does not, so children require more procedures during growth spurts ^[38]. Outcomes after grafting are worse in children: a prospective analysis found a higher rate of fair or poor results in pediatric patients (50%) than in adults (17%) ^[51]. Untreated head-and-neck burns in young children can produce morphological distortion of the facial skeleton, which argues against indefinite delay at this site ^[54].

Anatomic site shapes the approach. Eyelid contractures threaten the globe and warrant early release ^[52]. Neck contractures recur despite improved immobilization, and the released anterior neck is a recognized site of recontracture ^[8]. The largest share of severe, neglected, long-standing contractures presents in low- and lower-middle-income countries, where total body surface area burned, burn depth, low socioeconomic status, and limited infrastructure are associated with late complications ^[53].

Outcomes

Functional recovery after release is generally favorable but scales with the severity and the structures involved. In the classification of pediatric metacarpophalangeal contractures, improvement after reconstruction was seen in 95% of the least severe (type I) digits, 73% of intermediate (type II) digits, and 47% of the most severe (type III) digits ^[18]. For postburn elbow contractures in children, full extension was restored in 82% of contractures under 50 degrees but in only 50% of those greater than 50 degrees ^[57]. These gradients reflect a consistent theme: the more soft tissue and joint structure the contracture involves, the less complete the recovery.

Flap-based neck reconstruction reports strong functional results. In a systematic review of flap reconstruction of postburn neck contractures, range of motion was reported in most studies, with over 90% of patients achieving near-normal mobility, and major complications (5.7%), minor complications (7.2%), and recurrence (under 1.0%) were all rare ^[55]. Outcome reporting across the field is nonetheless inconsistent, which limits direct comparison between techniques.

Controversies and Evidence Gaps

The central unsettled question is which technique to use for a given contracture. A systematic review of burn scar contracture treatment concluded that no consensus exists on when to use which technique, and that the scarcity and low quality of the included studies prevented definitive conclusions; most studies had methodological shortcomings and used inappropriate statistical methods ^[12]. A systematic review of hand reconstruction techniques reached the same position: no consensus remains on the superiority of any single technique, and a stepwise, individualized approach guided by meticulous planning and intensive rehabilitation is what the evidence supports ^[7].

The comparative signal that does exist favors flaps over grafts for durability. A multicenter randomized controlled trial found that perforator-based interposition flaps produced more effective scar contracture release than full-thickness skin grafts at both 3 and 12 months and concluded they should be preferred where feasible ^[3]. Even so, flap selection itself lacks consensus; in flap reconstruction of neck contractures, no agreed framework exists for optimal flap selection or outcome evaluation ^[55].

Measurement is a further gap. There is no standardized, reliability-tested method for quantifying scar contracture, which weakens both clinical follow-up and research comparison ^[22]. Adjuncts to surgery are under continued study: fractional CO2 laser yields statistically significant improvements in scar profiles, though invasive treatments including surgical release carry high recurrence rates ^[58], and the evidence on the safety of post-burn exercise training remains limited ^[59]. The risk-factor literature itself is thin, with a surprising lack of robust evidence behind many accepted predictors of contracture ^[17].

References

[1] Costagliola M. "[General principles of burn reconstruction]." Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 2011. PMID: 21924538 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21924538/

[2] Oosterwijk AM, Mouton LJ, Schouten H, Disseldorp LM, van der Schans CP et al. "Prevalence of scar contractures after burn: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 27639820 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27639820/

[3] Stekelenburg CM, Jaspers MEH, Jongen SJM, Baas DC, Gardien KLM et al. "Perforator-Based Interposition Flaps Perform Better Than Full-Thickness Grafts for the Release of Burn Scar Contractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2017. PMID: 28121892 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28121892/

[4] Hundeshagen G, Zapata-Sirvent R, Goverman J, Branski LK. "Tissue Rearrangements: The Power of the Z-Plasty." Clinics in plastic surgery 2017. PMID: 28888305 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28888305/

[5] Abass O, Michael AI, Abubakar ML, Adebayo WO, Kabir MA et al. "Pediatric Postburn Flexion Contracture Release: Early Outcomes Using 2 Bloodless Techniques." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38442297 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38442297/

[6] Elemosho A, Raborn Macdonald LN, Bell DE, Janis JE. "Outcomes of Microsurgical Reconstruction of Post-Burn Joint Contracture-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Microsurgery 2025. PMID: 40817644 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40817644/

[7] Vosinakis C, Ippoliti S, Samoladas E, Haidich AB, Gamatsi IE et al. "Effectiveness of hand reconstruction techniques for the treatment of postburn contractures of the hand: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 39423713 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39423713/

[8] Hunt JA, Moisidis E, Haertsch P. "Initial experience of Integra in the treatment of post-burn anterior cervical neck contracture." British journal of plastic surgery 2000. PMID: 11090320 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11090320/

[9] Kraemer MD, Jones T, Deitch EA. "Burn contractures: incidence, predisposing factors, and results of surgical therapy." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1988. PMID: 3417720 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3417720/

[10] McCauley RL. "Reconstruction of the pediatric burned hand." Hand clinics 2009. PMID: 19801126 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19801126/

[11] Schneider JC, Ozsecen MY, Muraoka NK, Mancinelli C, Della Croce U et al. "Feasibility of an Exoskeleton-Based Interactive Video Game System for Upper Extremity Burn Contractures." PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation 2016. PMID: 26409198 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26409198/

[12] Stekelenburg CM, Marck RE, Tuinebreijer WE, de Vet HC, Ogawa R et al. "A systematic review on burn scar contracture treatment: searching for evidence." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25051521 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25051521/

[13] Schouten HJ, Nieuwenhuis MK, van Zuijlen PP. "A review on static splinting therapy to prevent burn scar contracture: do clinical and experimental data warrant its clinical application?" Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2012. PMID: 21831527 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21831527/

[14] Chandrasegaram MD, Harvey J. "Full-thickness vs split-skin grafting in pediatric hand burns--a 10-year review of 174 cases." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19692910 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19692910/

[15] Balumuka DD, Galiwango GW, Alenyo R. "Recurrence of post burn contractures of the elbow and shoulder joints: experience from a Ugandan hospital." BMC surgery 2015. PMID: 26353814 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26353814/

[16] Sasor SE, Chung KC. "Upper Extremity Burns in the Developing World: A Neglected Epidemic." Hand clinics 2019. PMID: 31585607 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31585607/

[17] Fanstone R, Price P. "Global perspectives on risk factors for major joint burn contractures: A literature review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 37977897 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37977897/

[18] Graham TJ, Stern PJ, True MS. "Classification and treatment of postburn metacarpophalangeal joint extension contractures in children." The Journal of hand surgery 1990. PMID: 2348063 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2348063/

[19] Hanumadass M, Kagan R, Matsuda T, Jayaram B. "Classification and surgical correction of postburn axillary contractures." The Journal of trauma 1986. PMID: 3951002 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3951002/

[20] Leung PC, Cheng JC. "Burn contractures of the foot." Foot & ankle 1986. PMID: 2873087 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2873087/

[21] Richard R, Steinlage R, Staley M, Keck T. "Mathematic model to estimate change in burn scar length required for joint range of motion." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1996. PMID: 8889869 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8889869/

[22] Parry I, Walker K, Niszczak J, Palmieri T, Greenhalgh D. "Methods and tools used for the measurement of burn scar contracture." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2010. PMID: 20859215 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20859215/

[23] Richard RL, Lester ME, Miller SF, Bailey JK, Hedman TL et al. "Identification of cutaneous functional units related to burn scar contracture development." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19506493 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19506493/

[24] Cauley RP, Helliwell LA, Donelan MB, Eberlin KR. "Reconstruction of the Adult and Pediatric Burned Hand." Hand clinics 2017. PMID: 28363299 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28363299/

[25] Deb R, Giessler GA, Przybilski M, Erdmann D, Germann G. "[Secondary plastic surgical reconstruction in severely burned patients]." Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 2004. PMID: 15221093 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15221093/

[26] Barret JP, Herndon DN, McCauley RL. "Use of previously burned skin as random cutaneous local flaps in pediatric burn reconstruction." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2002. PMID: 12163293 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12163293/

[27] Greyson MA, Wilkens SC, Sood RF, Winograd JM, Eberlin KR et al. "Five Essential Principles for First Web Space Reconstruction in the Burned Hand." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2020. PMID: 33141534 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33141534/

[28] Song Y, Li Y, Xia C, Zhang M, Yu N et al. "Use of Tissue Expansion and Serial Z-plasty for Release of Neck Postburn Scar Contracture." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31323100 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31323100/

[29] Daya M. "Clinical experience and analysis of length gain with the use of seven-flap plasty in burn contractures." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2008. PMID: 18378091 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18378091/

[30] Yang C, Yang Y, Zhong W, Li B, Li F. "Comparison Study of 5-Flap Z-Plasty and Double Z-Plasty for Interdigital Pocket Web Contractures." The Journal of hand surgery 2024. PMID: 36623947 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36623947/

[31] Hifny MA, Abozeid MA, Gamal W. "Comparative analysis of length gain provided by five-flap z-plasty and double z-plasty techniques for correction of digital flexion contractures." Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 2025. PMID: 39306509 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39306509/

[32] Ersoy B. "A new flap design for release of parallel contracture bands: dual opposing five-flap z-plasty." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24931824 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24931824/

[33] Ertaş NM, Küçükçelebi A, Bozdoğan N, Celebioğlu S. "The use of subcutaneous pedicle multiple rhomboid flaps in the treatment of long postburn scar contractures." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2004. PMID: 15302429 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15302429/

[34] Ertaş NM, Bozdoğan N, Erbaş O, Usçetin I, Küçükçelebi A et al. "The use of subcutaneous pedicle rhomboid flap in the treatment of postburn scar contractures." Annals of plastic surgery 2004. PMID: 15480009 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15480009/

[35] Verhaegen PDHM, Stekelenburg CM, van Trier AJM, Schade FB, van Zuijlen PPM. "Perforator-based interposition flaps for sustainable scar contracture release: a versatile, practical, and safe technique." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2011. PMID: 21460661 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21460661/

[36] Roberts AH, Dickson WA. "Fasciocutaneous flaps for burn reconstruction: a report of 57 flaps." British journal of plastic surgery 1988. PMID: 3349218 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3349218/

[37] Pensler JM, Steward R, Lewis SR, Herndon DN. "Reconstruction of the burned palm: full-thickness versus split-thickness skin grafts--long-term follow-up." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1988. PMID: 3275944 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3275944/

[38] Iwuagwu FC, Wilson D, Bailie F. "The use of skin grafts in postburn contracture release: a 10-year review." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1999. PMID: 10088507 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10088507/

[39] Prasetyono TO, Biben JA. "One-per-mil tumescent technique for upper extremity surgeries: broadening the indication." The Journal of hand surgery 2014. PMID: 24268832 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24268832/

[40] Bashir MM, Qayyum R, Saleem MH, Siddique K, Khan FA. "Effect of Time Interval Between Tumescent Local Anesthesia Infiltration and Start of Surgery on Operative Field Visibility in Hand Surgery Without Tourniquet." The Journal of hand surgery 2015. PMID: 25980735 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25980735/

[41] Bashir MM, Sohail M, Wahab A, Iqbal U, Qayyum R et al. "Outcomes of post burn flexion contracture release under tourniquet versus tumescent technique in children." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29454711 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29454711/

[42] Prasetyono TOH, Sadikin PM. "A randomized controlled trial: Comparison of one-per-mil tumescent technique and tourniquet in surgery for burn hand contracture in creating clear operative field and assessment of functional outcome." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 35016790 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35016790/

[43] Greenhalgh DG, Gaboury T, Warden GD. "The early release of axillary contractures in pediatric patients with burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1993. PMID: 8454665 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8454665/

[44] Peek A, Borsche A, Partecke BD. "[Surgical therapy in the second stage after burn injuries with special reference to reconstruction of face and hands]." Der Unfallchirurg 1995. PMID: 7761865 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7761865/

[45] Fan C, Azam F, Hinson C, Sink M, Jamison D et al. "Free Flap Reconstruction in Burns: A Systematic Review of Current Practices and Evidence." Microsurgery 2025. PMID: 40552611 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40552611/

[46] Jabir S, Frew Q, El-Muttardi N, Dziewulski P. "A systematic review of the applications of free tissue transfer in burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24518305 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24518305/

[47] Carmichael KD, Maxwell SC, Calhoun JH. "Recurrence rates of burn contracture ankle equinus and other foot deformities in children treated with Ilizarov fixation." Journal of pediatric orthopedics 2005. PMID: 15958908 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15958908/

[48] Waymack JP, Fidler J, Warden GD. "Surgical correction of burn scar contractures of the foot in children." Burns, including thermal injury 1988. PMID: 2898969 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2898969/

[49] Askar I. "Double reverse V-Y-plasty in postburn scar contractures: a new modification of V-Y-plasty." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2003. PMID: 14556733 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14556733/

[50] Neale HW, High RM, Billmire DA, Carey JP, Smith D et al. "Complications of controlled tissue expansion in the pediatric burn patient." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1988. PMID: 3174872 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3174872/

[51] McDonald WS, Deitch EA. "Hypertrophic skin grafts in burned patients: a prospective analysis of variables." The Journal of trauma 1987. PMID: 3546710 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3546710/

[52] Barrow RE, Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. "Early release of third-degree eyelid burns prevents eye injury." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2000. PMID: 10724243 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10724243/

[53] Meng F, Zuo KJ, Amar-Zifkin A, Baird R, Cugno S et al. "Pediatric burn contractures in low- and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of causes and factors affecting outcome." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31813620 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31813620/

[54] Katsaros J, David DJ, Griffin PA, Moore MH. "Facial dysmorphology in the neglected paediatric head and neck burn." British journal of plastic surgery 1990. PMID: 2328385 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2328385/

[55] Shulkin A, Katz A, Bouhadana G, Izadpanah A, Danino AM et al. "Flap reconstruction of post-burn neck contractures: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 41110342 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41110342/

[56] Palmieri TL, Petuskey K, Bagley A, Takashiba S, Greenhalgh DG et al. "Alterations in functional movement after axillary burn scar contracture: a motion analysis study." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2003. PMID: 12626930 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12626930/

[57] Stern PJ, Law EJ, Benedict FE, MacMillan BG. "Surgical treatment of elbow contractures in postburn children." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1985. PMID: 3898168 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3898168/

[58] Choi KJ, Williams EA, Pham CH, Collier ZJ, Dang J et al. "Fractional CO2 laser treatment for burn scar improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33288326 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33288326/

[59] Flores O, Tyack Z, Stockton K, Ware R, Paratz JD. "Exercise training for improving outcomes post-burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Clinical rehabilitation 2018. PMID: 29320878 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29320878/

[60] Mani MM, Chhatre M. "Reconstruction of the burned lower extremity." Clinics in plastic surgery 1992. PMID: 1633676 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1633676/