Body image, visible scarring, and disfigurement adjustment

Overview¶

Body image disturbance is close to universal after a significant burn. One nursing analysis described body image disturbance as present in essentially all burned people ^[52], and quantitative reviews place it among the most consequential of the psychosocial sequelae ^[1]. The reason the topic matters clinically is not that scars are unsightly. It is that a patient's appraisal of the changed body drives depression, post-traumatic stress, social withdrawal, and quality of life, often more powerfully than the size of the burn itself ^[4,10]. That appraisal can also be reclaimed: one survivor's first-person account describes regaining a positive body image through a gradual process of verbal and bodily disclosure after a hidden burn ^[74].

The clinical question this page answers is how appearance change becomes psychological injury, and where that process can be measured and influenced. Significant appearance changes such as scarring and disfigurement lead to body image dissatisfaction that in turn causes psychological problems ^[29], and the resulting stigma and discrimination compound the mental-health burden ^[54]. A burn surgeon should come away from this literature less interested in scar severity scores in isolation and more interested in how a given patient is interpreting and integrating the changed body, because that appraisal is what the outcome data track.

Epidemiology¶

Appearance concern is common and durable. In a study of injured youth, a large majority (70.0 percent) reported appearance concerns on at least one appearance measure, and girls reported more burn-related appearance concerns than boys ^[7]. Longitudinal screening with a brief appearance-concern subscale found that approximately 20 percent of all youth had appearance concerns over the first two years, after which the rate declined gradually, falling to around 10 percent after three years ^[8]. The early window is therefore when concern density is highest.

The literature spans the full range of burn populations. A scarring epidemiology review reported that body image dissatisfaction prevalence varied between 32 and 72 percent across studies, with identified risk factors including darker skin, female gender, young age, burn site on the neck and upper limb, and multiple or larger scars ^[2]. Among burn-surviving children, 61 percent reported being bullied at school, and bullying was reported as a problem by 68 percent of those with visible scars versus 54 percent with hidden scars ^[56]. In a sample of patients with facial burns, the majority had moderate-to-severe facial disfigurement (89 percent) alongside low self-esteem (74.5 percent) ^[46]. These figures are instrument-dependent and population-dependent, which is why a single prevalence number understates the variability.

Pathophysiology¶

The mechanism by which a burn becomes a body image problem is psychological, not anatomical. The changed body necessitates a concomitant alteration of the internal self-image, including feelings about the internal self, or self-esteem ^[44]. Work on the psyche of patients with visible-part disfigurement describes a disintegration of the body schema and an altered self-representation ^[57], and burns have been characterized as somatopsychic disorders in which a denial mechanism is more pronounced with more serious injury ^[57]. Burn injuries threaten the integrity of both the physical and the psychological identity ^[58].

The process is staged rather than instantaneous. Body image work describes two recurring critical incidents: facing the mirror, the moment the patient notices the changes in the body, and facing other people, the moment the patient becomes aware of attracting the attention of others ^[9]. Qualitative work found that early appearance concerns are influenced by the need for social acceptance and the desire to conform to societal ideals, and that internalised gender and appearance ideals and concerns about rejection and stigma are activated by the burn ^[39]. The encounter is therefore both internal, a renegotiation of self, and external, a renegotiation with the social world.

Assessment¶

Cosmetic disfigurement can be measured reliably despite its apparent subjectivity. Averaging the ratings of four or more viewers of photographs of severely burned children and young adults produced reliable measurement, with inter-rater reliability of .94 for overall disfigurement unclothed, and the rater's profession, sex, and years of contact with burned patients did not influence agreement ^[17]. In that work, impaired skin texture weighed three to five times as heavily as impaired color in overall disfigurement ratings ^[17]. That an external panel can score disfigurement reliably matters, but the more clinically useful measurement is the patient's own appraisal, which is what the outcome literature ties to distress.

Several validated patient-reported instruments exist. The Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire and the companion Social Comfort Questionnaire showed good internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity in 361 adult survivors, and factor analysis of the PSQ yielded factors for absence of friendly behavior, confused or staring behavior, and hostile behavior ^[15]. A Brazilian refined PSQ correlated strongly with depression (0.63), self-esteem (-0.57), body image (-0.63), and interpersonal relationships (-0.55), and scored significantly lower for patients with visible scars ^[16]. The Satisfaction With Appearance Scale and the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory have been culturally adapted and validated for burn populations, the latter with a Cronbach's alpha of .90 ^[18,19]. The Burn-Specific Health Scale family consistently identifies body image and skin sensitivity as the most impacted domains ^[20].

When measured against a non-burned comparison group, burn survivors and the general population reported similar levels of perceived stigmatization, but the survivors carried significantly more depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem, and perceived stigmatization correlated moderately with depression and inversely with self-esteem ^[73]. The mirror encounter is itself an assessment touchpoint. The registered nurse is most often present when a patient sees the wound for the first time (84 percent), and patients ask the nurse for an opinion about how the wound looks (81.5 percent) ^[21]. Among patients with facial burns, 47 percent were worried about looking for the first time, 55 percent were concerned about what they would see, and 42 percent held negative mental images of their faces before they looked ^[23]. Yet staff confidence is uneven: while 85 percent of burn-care staff believed it was important for patients to look at their injuries, a meaningful minority lacked confidence in preparing patients (18 percent) or felt they lacked the practical skills (24 percent) ^[22]. Authors of the facial-burn mirror study noted that preparing patients and investigating their expectations beforehand was identified as crucial ^[23].

Outcomes¶

The central finding of this literature is that subjective appraisal, not objective injury, drives psychological outcome. A scarring review found psychosocial variables such as social comfort and perceived stigmatization were more highly associated with body image than burn characteristics were ^[2]. In a visible-versus-hidden-scar study, visible scarring had only a low correlation with perceived stigmatization (.23) and was not correlated with depression, and burn characteristics accounted for less than 20 percent of the variance in body esteem; social adjustment and depression carried far more weight ^[3]. A broader synthesis concluded that burn size and severity are not directly associated with the degree of distress, but that subjective perceptions and interpretations of body image are what matters ^[10]. A systematic review of 33 studies captured the resulting heterogeneity directly: 12 reported a negative association between burn severity and body image, 14 reported no significant association, and six were mixed ^[1].

Body image dissatisfaction is a predictor, not just a correlate. In a longitudinal study, body image dissatisfaction was the most salient predictor of psychosocial function at 12 months and mediated the relationship between pre-burn and 12-month psychosocial function, with female sex, total body surface area, and the importance the patient placed on appearance predicting dissatisfaction ^[5]. Early body image dissatisfaction after severe burn was associated with significantly lower psychosocial and physical adjustment at follow-up ^[4]. A mediation study showed that early body image dissatisfaction significantly mediated the relationship between burn severity and later PTSD symptoms and between burn severity and later depressive symptoms, underscoring its role in the development and maintenance of psychosocial maladjustment long after injury ^[29]. Depressive symptoms in reconstruction-seeking patients were largely predicted by body image dissatisfaction, with the effect of burn variables on depression mediated through body image and physical function ^[61]. About half of patients had a risk of developing PTSD three months after discharge, and body image dissatisfaction was a potential predictor of that risk ^[34].

Time does not reliably heal the appearance dimension. Across four Burn-Specific Health Scale domains of interest, scores showed no significant change over time, indicating that the psychological and psychosocial impact of burns does not necessarily improve even with good physical and functional recovery ^[35]. Children followed for two years showed a significantly increased persistent desire to hide scarred body areas and remained self-conscious about body image two years after injury ^[40]. Greater body dissatisfaction at six months post-discharge tended to predict higher depressive symptoms at five years ^[6]. An eleven-year survey found that both younger and older patients with high burn severity identified lasting impairments in quality of life after injury ^[64]. Even after a small burn, the greatest impact at three to four months was on anxiety and trauma-related stress rather than physical or social function, with nearly a third of responders carrying clinically significant scores ^[65]. Coping style is part of the picture: a set of dysfunctional coping styles explained 39.2 percent of the variance in body image, with self-blame and self-distraction as independent predictors of negative body perception ^[33], and concern over scarring combined with an avoidant coping style accounted for 61 percent of the variance in post-traumatic stress symptomatology ^[32]. The specific coping mix matters: patients who used both venting of emotions and mental disengagement during acute hospitalization had significantly higher body image dissatisfaction with nonfacial appearance and a greater negative social impact of disfigurement at two months than those who used one or neither ^[71]. Older clinical work had already mapped adjustment into recurring cluster patterns by examining patients' cognitive, affective, and behavioral styles, including their use of denial and how they managed hostility ^[70].

The literature is not uniformly bleak. A self-esteem study found that 85 percent of severely burned respondents had adequate to high self-esteem, and that the size and location of the burn did not significantly affect self-esteem, while age at burn and time since burn did ^[43]. The same body of work concluded that the majority of burned people make a successful adjustment even after large and disfiguring injuries, though that rehabilitation is long-term and episodic ^[43]. Burn size and severity are not directly associated with the degree of distress, and a survivor's subjective perceptions and interpretations of body image are what prove pertinent ^[10], and higher body image satisfaction has been associated with greater resilience ^[59].

Special Considerations¶

Women¶

Women carry a heavier appearance burden across studies. Women with burn injury reported higher dissatisfaction with appearance than men over the two years after discharge, and individuals with larger TBSA reported greater dissatisfaction across that period ^[6]. Body dissatisfaction at six months post-discharge mediated the effects of gender and TBSA on depressive symptoms five years later ^[6], and body image appears to be particularly important for women in narrative work ^[10]. Sexual functioning is part of this picture: burn survivors experience sexuality, body image, and relationship changes that may affect quality of life over time ^[35]. Among women attending a referral burn clinic, deep burns harmed physical, emotional, and psychological function and self-image, with the heaviest quality-of-life impact concentrated in women with darker skin, lower education, and lower income ^[66]. Narrative work with women survivors makes the timeline explicit: their accounts emphasized the humiliation they faced from family and friends and a frustratingly slow psychological acceptance of their scars ^[69]. Authors of a gender-difference study recommended that individuals with heightened body image dissatisfaction, particularly women and those with larger TBSA, participate in evidence-based psychosocial interventions ^[6].

Children and adolescents¶

Development of body image is integral to adolescent psychological growth, and burned teenagers can struggle to readjust because they have not yet formed their own self-concept ^[51]. The pediatric data are paradoxical. Several studies found burned children reporting self-concept at or above normative levels: children with 80 percent or greater TBSA burns developed positive feelings about themselves and appeared no more troubled than nonburned children ^[41], and adolescents with disfiguring burn scars reported thoughts, feelings, and behaviors similar to nonburned adolescents ^[42]. Yet authors caution that pediatric survivors may appear superficially well-adjusted while harboring grave self-deprecating feelings ^[11]. Among burn-injured adolescents and young adults, those who perceived more social support held more positive body images, greater self-esteem, and less depression than their peers ^[62]. The parent's role in facilitating a positive self-image emerged as a primary factor influencing adaptation in disfigured children ^[44].

Facial, head-and-neck, and genital burns¶

Site matters for appearance outcome. Adults with head-and-neck burns demonstrated significantly worse satisfaction with appearance and worse mental component quality of life than those without ^[12], and head-and-neck burn independently predicted worse anxiety at 6 and 12 months and worse body image at 6, 12, and 24 months ^[13]. Severe facial disfigurement is associated with a significant reduction in health-related quality of life, which composite tissue allotransplantation has the potential to improve ^[14]. Facial burns and amputations were independent risk factors for persistent social stigma, while male sex and increased community integration were protective ^[31]. In a five-year study of young adults with facial burns, an initial disadvantage in perceived appearance diminished over time, but satisfaction with role started better than the non-face-burned group and then worsened across follow-up ^[63]. In a Burn Model System study, body image scores declined for participants with genital burns while improving for those without, with significant differences at 12 and 24 months ^[45].

Stigmatization and the social mechanism¶

The pathway from appearance to distress runs through other people. Social stigma, symptoms of depression, and symptoms of PTSD completely mediated the association between body image and community integration in one analysis, supporting that distress and stigma, not the scar itself, are what link appearance to reintegration ^[30]. Facial-burn patients carried a medium-level stigma score and low self-esteem, and family income, education, payment method, and self-esteem together explained 33.7 percent of the variation in stigma ^[47]. In a study of burn care in India, disfigurement, disability, and scarring led to increased social stigma and discrimination that exacerbated mental-health concerns ^[54]. The social cost is measurable in adjustment terms: psychosocial rehabilitation was significantly related to burn survivors feeling shame in society and to the insults society directs at them ^[72].

Management¶

Management of body image after burns combines screening, the psychological therapies, camouflage, and reconstruction. Across this literature, authors frame these as options whose evidence strength varies rather than as settled prescriptions.

Screening and the mirror encounter are the entry points. Authors of a longitudinal body image study identified routine psychological screening for body image distress during hospitalization and after discharge as important ^[5], and a head-and-neck cohort found patient-reported dissatisfaction that the authors said pointed to a need for additional counseling, psychotherapy, and aftercare ^[13]. A nursing care framework for body image disturbance pairs assessment using the Satisfaction With Appearance Scale with interventions of cognitive restructuring and body image enhancement ^[52].

Psychosocial and mind-body interventions show signal. A yoga-nidra trial reported a statistically significant improvement in self-esteem and body image in the experimental group ^[28], and a perceived-stress study found patients with autograft surgery had higher perceived body image than those without ^[27]. A burn-ICU randomized trial of the Benson relaxation technique versus nature sounds found body image dissatisfaction fell significantly in all arms by weeks three and five, with Benson relaxation proving the more effective of the two on body image satisfaction ^[68]. Acceptance and commitment therapy is an active research direction: psychological flexibility and self-compassion at admission were associated with decreased appearance concerns prospectively at two- and six-month follow-up ^[38], reduced acceptance and cognitive defusion were related to increased appearance anxiety ^[37], and an early ACT-based intervention was found acceptable to patients delivered in person or virtually ^[36]. Authors across these ACT studies suggest early interventions targeting psychological flexibility may be beneficial if adapted to address appearance concerns ^[39].

Cosmetic camouflage has pediatric trial support. A computer color-matched spray-on skin camouflage improved psychosocial functioning, with significant improvement in emotional symptoms and total difficulties on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire across treated children, and was well-tolerated ^[24,25]. Authors described cosmetic camouflage as a tool to help children with scarring participate socially in their communities ^[25]. Social-skills training targets the encounter with other people directly: after a workshop teaching individuals with disfiguring conditions how to contend with staring, 80 percent felt better prepared to cope with staring and 83 percent reported a better understanding of why people stare ^[67].

Reconstruction addresses the disfigurement directly. Microvascular composite reconstruction of severely disfigured burned faces achieved aesthetic restoration that, with makeup, was near normal in social settings at conversational distances ^[53], and composite tissue allotransplantation has the potential to improve the reduced health-related quality of life associated with severe facial disfigurement ^[14]. A combined PTSD-and-psychosocial treatment protocol produced significant and large improvement in community reintegration alongside significant body image improvement ^[55].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps¶

The strongest controversy is the weak and inconsistent link between objective injury and body image outcome. The systematic review evidence is genuinely split, with roughly equal numbers of studies finding a negative severity-body-image association and finding none ^[1]. The visible-versus-hidden-scar literature undercuts a common clinical assumption: the supposition that visible scarring is more psychologically damaging than hidden scars has little supporting evidence ^[11], and in at least one sample scar visibility and severity did not have a strong relationship with social and emotional adjustment ^[3]. This argues against using scar location or extent as a proxy for who will struggle.

The treatment evidence is the largest gap. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences found that none of the included papers adequately demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of the interventions ^[50]. That same review concluded that further research is needed to adequately demonstrate the effectiveness of existing interventions, and that a greater number of randomized controlled trials and experimental studies are required to increase the methodological validity of intervention studies ^[50]. Burn-camp effects on the appearance dimension are modest where they are measured: a controlled study found only a small, short-term positive effect on the satisfaction-with-appearance component of body image ^[26]. Whether improved scar aesthetics even translates to better quality of life is unsettled; one review concluded that, except for functional release of contractures, improved scar aesthetic quality does not necessarily translate into improved quality of life ^[49].

Measurement gaps persist. A core-outcome-set study found that available patient-reported instruments did not assess psychological adjustment and the attainment of a sense of normality, an outcome patients and parents identified as important ^[48]. Sexuality and body image remain poorly addressed in specialist centers worldwide despite a considerable number of patients reporting intimate-function problems ^[60]. The evidence base is therefore richest on description and prediction and thinnest on the controlled evaluation of the interventions clinicians actually use.

References¶

[1] Cleary M, Kornhaber R, Thapa DK, West S, Visentin D. "A quantitative systematic review assessing the impact of burn injuries on body image." Body image 2020. PMID: 32109831. ↩

[2] Lawrence JW, Mason ST, Schomer K, Klein MB. "Epidemiology and impact of scarring after burn injury: a systematic review of the literature." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22138807. ↩

[3] Lawrence JW, Fauerbach JA, Heinberg L, Doctor M. "Visible vs hidden scars and their relation to body esteem." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2004. PMID: 14726736. ↩

[4] Fauerbach JA, Heinberg LJ, Lawrence JW, Munster AM, Palombo DA, Richter D. "Effect of early body image dissatisfaction on subsequent psychological and physical adjustment after disfiguring injury." Psychosomatic medicine 2000. PMID: 10949104. ↩

[5] Thombs BD, Notes LD, Lawrence JW, Magyar-Russell G, Bresnick MG, Fauerbach JA. "From survival to socialization: a longitudinal study of body image in survivors of severe burn injury." Journal of psychosomatic research 2008. PMID: 18222134. ↩

[6] Al Ghriwati N, Sutter M, Pierce BS, Perrin PB, Wiechman SA, Schneider JC. "Two-Year Gender Differences in Satisfaction With Appearance After Burn Injury and Prediction of Five-Year Depression: A Latent Growth Curve Approach." Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2017. PMID: 28483656. ↩

[7] Riobueno-Naylor A, Williamson H, Canenguez K, Kogosov A, Drexler A, Sadeq F. "Appearance Concerns, Psychosocial Outcomes, and the Feasibility of Implementing an Online Intervention for Adolescents Receiving Outpatient Burn Care." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 32594128. ↩

[8] Weed VF, Canenguez K, Romo S, Wang SL, Kazis L, Lee AF. "The Use of a Brief Measure to Assess Longitudinal Changes in Appearance Concerns for Youth Recovering From Burn Injuries." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 30371792. ↩

[9] Bergamasco EC, Rossi LA, da C G Amancio A, de Carvalho EC. "Body image of patients with burns sequellae: evaluation through the critical incident technique." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2002. PMID: 11834329. ↩

[10] Hunter TA, Medved MI, Hiebert-Murphy D, Brockmeier J, Sareen J, Thakrar S. "Put on your face to face the world: women's narratives of burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2013. PMID: 23768714. ↩

[11] Abdullah A, Blakeney P, Hunt R, Broemeling L, Phillips L, Herndon DN. "Visible scars and self-esteem in pediatric patients with burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1994. PMID: 8195258. ↩

[12] Sinha I, Nabi M, Simko LC, Wolfe AW, Wiechman S, Giatsidis G. "Head and neck burns are associated with long-term patient-reported dissatisfaction with appearance: A Burn Model System National Database study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30732865. ↩

[13] Choe D, McMullen K, Stewart BT, Kowalske K, Schneider JC, Ryan CM. "Adults With Head and Neck Burns Experience Worse Long-Term Outcomes and Require More Reconstructive Surgeries: A Burn Model System Study." Annals of plastic surgery 2025. PMID: 39729552. ↩

[14] Chuback J, Yarascavitch B, Yarascavitch A, Kaur MN, Martin S, Thoma A. "Measuring utilities of severe facial disfigurement and composite tissue allotransplantation of the face in patients with severe face and neck burns from the perspectives of the general public, medical experts and patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 26068209. ↩

[15] Lawrence JW, Fauerbach JA, Heinberg LJ, Doctor M, Thombs BD. "The reliability and validity of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Social Comfort Questionnaire (SCQ) among an adult burn survivor sample." Psychological assessment 2006. PMID: 16594819. ↩

[16] Freitas NO, Forero CG, Caltran MP, Alonso J, Dantas RAS, Piccolo MS. "Validation of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire for Brazilian adult burn patients." PloS one 2018. PMID: 29381711. ↩

[17] Smith GM, Tompkins DM, Bigelow ME, Antoon AY. "Burn-induced cosmetic disfigurement: can it be measured reliably?." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1988. PMID: 3220850. ↩

[18] Caltran MP, Freitas NO, Dantas RA, Farina JA, Rossi LA. "Satisfaction With Appearance Scale-SWAP: Adaptation and validation for Brazilian burn victims." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27143340. ↩

[19] Assunção FF, Dantas RA, Ciol MA, Gonçalves N, Farina JA, Rossi LA. "Reliability and validity of the body image quality of life inventory: version for Brazilian burn victims." Research in nursing & health 2013. PMID: 23494960. ↩

[20] McMahon HA, Ndem I, Gampper L, Gampper TJ, DeGeorge BR. "Quantifying Burn Injury-Related Disability and Quality of Life in the Developing World: A Primer for Patient-Centered Resource Allocation." Annals of plastic surgery 2019. PMID: 30557188. ↩

[21] Birdsall C, Weinberg K. "Adult patients looking at their burn injuries for the first time." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2001. PMID: 11570538. ↩

[22] Shepherd L, Begum R. "Helping burn patients to look at their injuries: how confident are burn care staff and how often do they help?." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24916458. ↩

[23] Shepherd L, Tattersall H, Buchanan H. "Looking in the mirror for the first time after facial burns: a retrospective mixed methods study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24742782. ↩

[24] Martin G, Swannell S, Mill J, Mott J, Evans J, Frederiksen N. "Spray on skin improves psychosocial functioning in pediatric burns patients: a randomized controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2008. PMID: 18082960. ↩

[25] Maskell J, Newcombe P, Martin G, Kimble R. "Psychological and psychosocial functioning of children with burn scarring using cosmetic camouflage: a multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 23770131. ↩

[26] Bakker A, Van der Heijden PG, Van Son MJ, Van de Schoot R, Van Loey NE. "Impact of pediatric burn camps on participants' self esteem and body image: an empirical study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2011. PMID: 21752547. ↩

[27] Uyar B, Akkoç MF, Bulbuloglu S, Yilmaz R. "Examining the perceived stress and body image in burn patients: A cross-sectional study." International wound journal 2023. PMID: 36250921. ↩

[28] Ozdemir A, Saritas S. "Effect of yoga nidra on the self-esteem and body image of burn patients." Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2019. PMID: 31003692. ↩

[29] Huang YK, Su YJ. "Burn severity and long-term psychosocial adjustment after burn injury: The mediating role of body image dissatisfaction." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33413917. ↩

[30] Mercado AE, Donthula D, Thomas JE, Ring D, Trust M, Crijns TJ. "Mediators and moderators of the relationship between body image and community integration among burn survivors." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 34930643. ↩

[31] Ross E, Crijns TJ, Ring D, Coopwood B. "Social factors and injury characteristics associated with the development of perceived injury stigma among burn survivors." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 32830004. ↩

[32] Bryant RA. "Predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder following burns injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1996. PMID: 8634136. ↩

[33] Rothman DJ, Sutter M, Perrin PB, LiBrandi H, Feldman MJ. "Coping styles and quality of life in adults with burn." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27297941. ↩

[34] Dahl O, Wickman M, Björnhagen V, Friberg M, Wengström Y. "Early assessment and identification of posttraumatic stress disorder, satisfaction with appearance and coping in patients with burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27707641. ↩

[35] Connell KM, Phillips M, Coates R, Doherty-Poirier M, Wood FM. "Sexuality, body image and relationships following burns: analysis of BSHS-B outcome measures." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24529571. ↩

[36] Shepherd L, Sirois F, Harcourt D, Norman P, McCracken LM, Thompson AR. "A mixed-methods study investigating the acceptability of an early acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention to aid adjustment to appearance changes after burns." Body image 2026. PMID: 41687327. ↩

[37] Shepherd L, Reynolds DP, Turner A, O'Boyle CP, Thompson AR. "The role of psychological flexibility in appearance anxiety in people who have experienced a visible burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30591252. ↩

[38] Shepherd L, Sirois FM, Harcourt D, Norman P, Aaron D, Adkins K. "A multi-centre prospective cohort study investigating the roles of psychological flexibility and self-compassion in appearance concerns after burn injuries." British journal of health psychology 2025. PMID: 39358827. ↩

[39] Shepherd L, Sirois F, Harcourt D, Norman P, Thompson AR. "Early appearance concerns after burns: Investigating the roles of psychological flexibility and self-compassion." Body image 2024. PMID: 39357425. ↩

[40] Wurzer P, Forbes AA, Hundeshagen G, Andersen CR, Epperson KM, Meyer WJ. "Two-year follow-up of outcomes related to scarring and distress in children with severe burns." Disability and rehabilitation 2017. PMID: 27685196. ↩

[41] Blakeney P, Meyer W, Moore P, Murphy L, Broemeling L, Robson M. "Psychosocial sequelae of pediatric burns involving 80% or greater total body surface area." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1993. PMID: 8300704. ↩

[42] Robert RS, Blakeney PE, Meyer WJ. "Impact of disfiguring burn scars on adolescent sexual development." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1998. PMID: 9789179. ↩

[43] Bowden ML, Feller I, Tholen D, Davidson TN, James MH. "Self-esteem of severely burned patients." Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1980. PMID: 7425816. ↩

[44] Beard SA, Herndon DN, Desai M. "Adaptation of self-image in burn-disfigured children." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1989. PMID: 2600107. ↩

[45] Johnson D, Humbert A, Roaten K, Wiechman S, Schneider JC, Yenikomshian HA. "Sexual Function, Body Image, and Quality of Life After Genital Burns: A Burn Model System Database Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40341940. ↩

[46] Chaudhary FA, Ahmad B. "The relationship between psychosocial distress and oral health status in patients with facial burns and mediation by oral health behaviour." BMC oral health 2021. PMID: 33794862. ↩

[47] Wu X, Hu Y, Li Y, Li S, Li H, Ye X. "Stigma and self-esteem in facial burn patients: A correlation study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38472001. ↩

[48] Jones LL, Calvert M, Moiemen N, Deeks JJ, Bishop J, Kinghorn P. "Outcomes important to burns patients during scar management and how they compare to the concepts captured in burn-specific patient reported outcome measures." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 29031889. ↩

[49] Atiyeh B, El Hachem TF, Chalhoub R, Emsieh SE. "Have the recent advancements in wound repair and scar management technology improved the quality of life in burn patients?." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40112656. ↩

[50] Bessell A, Moss TP. "Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature." Body image 2007. PMID: 18089269. ↩

[51] Wallace E. "Nursing a teenager with burns." British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) 1993. PMID: 8485360. ↩

[52] Martín Parra M. "[Body Image Disturbances in Burned People: Nurse's Approach]." Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain) 2017. PMID: 30277362. ↩

[53] Rose EH. "Aesthetic restoration of the severely disfigured face in burn victims: a comprehensive strategy." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1995. PMID: 7480277. ↩

[54] Singh P, Jagnoor J, Khurram MF, Mishra B, Keshri VR. "Stigma and discrimination in healthcare: Challenges faced by burn patients in India." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40480063. ↩

[55] Cukor J, Wyka K, Leahy N, Yurt R, Difede J. "The treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and related psychosocial consequences of burn injury: a pilot study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25407385. ↩

[56] Rimmer RB, Foster KN, Bay CR, Floros J, Rutter C, Bosch J. "The reported effects of bullying on burn-surviving children." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2007. PMID: 17438488. ↩

[57] Königová R, Pondelícek I. "Psychological aspects of burns." Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery 1987. PMID: 3441763. ↩

[58] McQuaid D, Barton J, Campbell EA. "Body image issues for children and adolescents with burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2000. PMID: 10850899. ↩

[59] Vardanjani MM, Amiri Bonyad S, Yousofvand V, Motie M, Falahan SN, Khazaei S. "The relationship between satisfaction with body image and resilience in burn patients: a cross-sectional study in Iran." BMC psychology 2025. PMID: 41345708. ↩

[60] Pandya AA, Corkill HA, Goutos I. "Sexual Function Following Burn Injuries: Literature Review." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25423439. ↩

[61] Thombs BD, Haines JM, Bresnick MG, Magyar-Russell G, Fauerbach JA, Spence RJ. "Depression in burn reconstruction patients: symptom prevalence and association with body image dissatisfaction and physical function." General hospital psychiatry 2007. PMID: 17189739. ↩

[62] Orr DA, Reznikoff M, Smith GM. "Body image, self-esteem, and depression in burn-injured adolescents and young adults." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1989. PMID: 2793926. ↩

[63] Ryan CM, Lee A, Stoddard FJ, Li NC, Schneider JC, Shapiro GD. "The Effect of Facial Burns on Long-Term Outcomes in Young Adults: A 5-Year Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2018. PMID: 29901795. ↩

[64] Cobb N, Maxwell G, Silverstein P. "Patient perception of quality of life after burn injury. Results of an eleven-year survey." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1990. PMID: 2401689. ↩

[65] Shakespeare V. "Effect of small burn injury on physical, social and psychological health at 3-4 months after discharge." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1998. PMID: 9915675. ↩

[66] Freitas SMSM, Lima CF, Albuquerque AK, Freitas Júnior RA, Souza GFA, Souza ASR. "Impact of Profound Burn on the Quality of Life of Women Attended at the Referral Outpatient Clinic in the State of Pernambuco." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2020. PMID: 31730172. ↩

[67] Pell C. "What to Do When People Stare: A Workshop to Teach Individuals With Disfiguring Conditions to Contend With Staring and Improve Control of Social Interactions." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31504616. ↩

[68] Kutenai HJ, Jafari H, Shafipour V, Zarghami M, Moosazadeh M. "Comparison of the effects of Benson relaxation technique and nature sounds on pain, anxiety, and body image in burn-injured patients admitted to the burn ICU: A single-blind randomized clinical trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2023. PMID: 36593137. ↩

[69] Dekel B, van Niekerk A. "Women's recovery, negotiation of appearance, and social reintegration following a burn." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29395394. ↩

[70] Bernstein NR, O'Connell K, Chedekel D. "Patterns of burn adjustment." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1992. PMID: 1572855. ↩

[71] Fauerbach JA, Heinberg LJ, Lawrence JW, Bryant AG, Richter L, Spence RJ. "Coping with body image changes following a disfiguring burn injury." Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 2002. PMID: 11950101. ↩

[72] Din S, Shah M, Asadullah, Jamal H, Bilal M. "Rehabilitation and social adjustment of people with burns in society." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 24934521. ↩

[73] de Oliveira Freitas N, Pitta NC, Dantas RAS, Farina JA, Rossi LA. "Comparison of the perceived stigmatization measures between the general population and burn survivors in Brazil." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31451312. ↩

[74] Willis-Helmich JJ. "Reclaiming body image: the hidden burn." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1992. PMID: 1572860. ↩