Peer support, burn camps, and community reintegration

Overview¶

Survivors are direct about what matters most to them. Asked about life after the burn unit, they tell clinicians that community integration, with its accompanying social anxiety and social strain, is arguably their single most important issue ^[1]. Their overall sense of well-being and satisfaction with life are contingent on the ease with which they interact with the nonburned community, and their long-term psychosocial adaptation depends in large part on successful integration into community life ^[1]. Helping patients re-enter society has been framed as the ultimate goal of burn treatment ^[62]. This is the clinical frame for the present topic: peer support, support groups, and burn camps are not soft adjuncts to wound healing but the programmatic responses to the problem survivors themselves rank first.

The reintegration task is concrete. Survivors say they feel very self-conscious and anxious about relating to other people, and they are not necessarily helped by nonspecific reassurances that things will improve with time ^[1]. Visible scarring after a burn creates social challenges that impair interpersonal connection, with emotional barriers such as fear of rejection, self-consciousness, embarrassment, and humiliation, and situational barriers such as the inquisitive questions and comments of others ^[37]. Against that backdrop, peer contact, mutual aid, and structured community programs aim to supply the belonging, modeling, and hope that generic encouragement cannot.

Two cautions frame everything that follows. First, the literature here is overwhelmingly observational, qualitative, and program-evaluation work, not controlled trial evidence; less than 1 percent of clinical rehabilitation research and of rehabilitation randomized trials addresses burns ^[65]. Second, the interventions that survivors value most are also the ones whose efficacy is hardest to demonstrate. Both points are developed in the Controversies section, and they should temper how strongly any single program is presented to a patient or family.

Epidemiology¶

Engagement with peer support is the exception, not the rule. In a Burn Model System cohort of 1,123 participants, only 17 percent engaged in peer support at 6 months, with similar levels at 12 and 24 months (15 percent each) ^[2]. Peer-support participants had larger burns (27 percent vs 16 percent total body surface area), longer hospital stays (41 vs 25 days), and higher education levels than nonusers, and the authors concluded peer support is underutilized, particularly among patients with smaller burns and lower education ^[2]. A LIBRE study similarly found that among 596 respondents, 330 (55 percent) reported support-group attendance, and attendees had larger burns and were more likely to be more than 10 years from injury ^[4]. The consistent signal is selection toward more severely injured, longer-tenured survivors.

Burn-camp reach is likewise finite and was disrupted by the pandemic. In a survey of camp organizations, the mean number of camps offered per organization fell from 6.3 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2020, and aggregate participation dropped from a 2019 mean of 229.2 to a 2020 mean of 151.4 survivors and family members ^[32]; 62 percent of respondents held virtual camps in 2020 while the rest canceled ^[32].

The psychosocial burden that drives demand for these programs is large. A meta-analysis pooled an overall depression prevalence of 60.7 percent among burn survivors, with major burns (greater than 30 percent TBSA) carrying 2.48 times the risk ^[55], while a systematic review using structured interviews identified major depression in 4 to 10 percent of adults in the year after discharge, illustrating how heavily prevalence estimates depend on instrument ^[56]. Post-traumatic stress disorder affects about one in five survivors, with a pooled prevalence of 20.5 percent that decreases modestly over time ^[60]. Social patterning matters for who arrives most burdened: pediatric burn incidence is increased in lower-income families, children with behavioral disorders, fewer years of parental education, and rural settings ^[49].

Forms of peer support and burn camps¶

One-to-one and inpatient peer support¶

Peer support rests on a simple mechanism: a survivor who has lived through a burn can provide a kind of support that professionals cannot, instilling hope and assisting the coping efforts of survivors and families through shared experience ^[10]. A long-recognized component of supportive networks for people facing adversity ^[3], inpatient peer support has been described phenomenologically as a valuable resource clustering around encouragement, inspiration and hope, reassurance, the importance of timing, the shared experience of "the same skin," and appropriate matching ^[3]. These findings demonstrate that peer support assists with fostering reassurance, hope, and motivation in burn rehabilitation ^[3].

Program evaluations support feasibility. In a peer-consultation program, three trained peer consultants who had survived their own burns made 167 visits to 108 inpatients over 17 months, and patients reported that the consultants approached them appropriately, answered questions, and provided useful support and information ^[12]. Adult survivors hold strongly positive views of peer support, reporting that peer supporters gave a sense of belonging and affiliation along with hope and confidence ^[7]; two-thirds had themselves served as peer supporters after their injuries, pointing to the reciprocal, mutual-aid character of the practice ^[7]. A scoping review of one-to-one peer support identified themes spanning program design and impact and described an emerging pattern of benefit for both givers and receivers, while characterizing the data as preliminary ^[6].

A controlled signal exists at the margins. A randomized controlled trial of patient-centered peer counseling reported significantly reduced pain and anxiety in the intervention group relative to standard education, positioning peer counseling as a potential nonpharmaceutical adjunct during recovery ^[14].

Support groups¶

Facilitated groups are a recurring outpatient and community modality. Qualitative analyses describe group members coalescing around acceptance of self, perspective change, the value of community, and reciprocity, with an overall perceived positive impact on psychosocial recovery as the group encourages adaptive coping and facilitates relationships ^[11]. Adolescents who attended a burn patient support group cited the chance to define for self and others how one copes, meeting others with similar experiences, expressing feelings, and learning new coping skills; 90 percent would recommend the group and attend again ^[13]. A systematic review of peer-support group programs found that all four inpatient program reports and all eight outpatient program reports described associations with psychosocial improvements such as life satisfaction, self-acceptance, and reduced isolation, while two integrative programs reported social integration and reductions in post-traumatic stress and anxiety ^[5].

Online and technology-delivered peer support¶

Survivors increasingly turn to web-based and social-media resources during recovery and long after discharge ^[15]. A qualitative analysis of survivor biographies on peer-support websites found that peer and family support was a common theme and that these online communities have become a mainstream resource and part of the reclamation process ^[15]. For young adults burned before adulthood, social media facilitated a flow of social support and information that was motivating and encouraging, organized around identity, connectivity, social support, meaning-making, and privacy ^[16]. Dedicated tools have been piloted: a discharge mobile application was designed to deliver recovery-stage-appropriate content and links to supportive sites for the first 90 days, with the goal of decreasing unplanned readmissions while supporting quality of life ^[17], and a parent-focused, peer-informed website was created and tested for acceptability, though it did not itself provide peer interaction ^[18]. A transitional tele-rehabilitation program delivered through a social-media platform produced statistically significant improvements in interpersonal relationship and overall quality-of-life scores on the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief ^[19].

Burn camps¶

Burn camps are an integrative psychosocial intervention combining recreation, peer contact, and acceptance ^[25]. The principal goal is psychosocial readjustment through peer interaction and the resulting enhancement of self-esteem ^[22,23]. Adolescent campers describe camp as a place of belonging and acceptance where they do not have to hide their bodies and can learn to integrate their scars into their body image in a positive way ^[28], and qualitative work consistently finds campers feel "normal" and accepted, gain insight and meaning, and develop confidence, self-esteem, and empathy ^[29]. An overwhelming majority (96 percent) of young people in one long-term follow-up reported a positive experience, would return, and recommended camp, with impacts of normalizing, social support, psychological recovery, and confidence ^[26]. Burn-injured adolescents have reported that camp improved identity exploration, goal-setting, problem-solving, communication, emotional regulation, and time-management skills, with greater improvement among those attending more than five years ^[25].

The quantitative picture is more cautious. Some self-esteem studies found gains: in one camp cohort 37 percent of children showed increased self-esteem, but 30 percent showed no change ^[22], and another study reported that the camp experience did not necessarily increase self-esteem in the majority of campers as measured, with 58 percent unchanged ^[23]. A controlled study found only a small, statistically modest positive short-term effect on the satisfaction-with-appearance component of body image ^[24]. The family-camp variant extends benefit to the whole family system: thematic work identified benefits for the family as a whole, for the child (fun without feeling different), and for the parent or carer (support from those who understand) ^[30], and parents in one study described Family Burn Camp as a beacon, "worth more than a thousand therapy sessions," and a crucial element of family rehabilitation ^[31].

Community and social reintegration¶

Community integration is itself a meaningful outcome after major burn injury and can be measured: the Community Integration Questionnaire was administered to 463 individuals with major burns, and survivors showed significant difficulties from both burn-related and non-burn-related factors ^[33]. The shortened CIQ-13, validated in the adult burn population, captures self/family care and social integration with adequate reliability ^[35]. The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile was developed specifically to assess social participation across six domains: relationships with family and friends, social interactions, social activities, work and employment, romantic relationships, and sexual relationships ^[36].

Survivors themselves locate the engine of reintegration in their relationships. A photovoice study of survivors rebuilding their lives found that the greatest influence in bringing about positive change was support from family, friends, and other burn survivors, and that as survivors began new social activities they were able to establish new interpersonal relationships ^[73].

Social participation outcomes are clinically consequential, not cosmetic. Two years after injury, higher LIBRE social-interaction and social-activity scores are associated with better mental-component quality of life, and social activities also track with the physical component ^[50]. Among adults, social support and mindfulness are significantly associated with less psychological distress in a population found to carry severe distress ^[51], and social support at discharge predicts social participation at 12 months, mediated by body image at 6 months ^[52]. Network structure matters too: survivors with smaller, more close-knit personal networks and fewer advisors reported better social participation, suggesting that network composition, not size alone, shapes reintegration ^[53].

Work and school are the concrete arenas of reintegration. Return to work is a major rehabilitation milestone whose barriers and facilitators include residual impairment, the social environment, and workplace accommodation; survivors report that return-to-work efforts are inadequately supported and that colleagues should be educated about burn recovery ^[38]. A knowledge-translation intervention to support work reintegration left control-group survivors reporting more barriers and more psychological symptoms, suggesting the tool helped survivors self-advocate ^[39]. Early focus on community integration, including return to work and school with coordinated, supportive planning and vocational or school-reentry coordinators, is recommended ^[40]. For children, an integrative review concluded that school reintegration should begin as soon as the child is admitted and should address the needs of child, parents, and teachers in a tailored program ^[41]; in one sub-Saharan cohort the mean time to return to school was 8.4 weeks, several times longer than prior reports ^[42].

Reintegration is not uniformly a story of deficit. In a LIBRE study, burn survivors reported higher work-and-employment participation than a general U.S. sample, a difference that persisted after adjustment and may reflect resilience, post-traumatic growth, response shift, or sampling ^[43]. Likelihood of sexual activity and romantic relationships was broadly similar between survivors and a general sample ^[44]. The picture is domain-specific: larger burns are associated with lower social-activity and work scores but higher family-and-friends scores ^[45], and work-related injury predicts worse work-and-employment outcomes specifically ^[46].

Assessment¶

Reintegration is measurable, and burn-specific tools now exist for it. The LIBRE Profile provides reliable, valid measurement of social participation, with score cut-points that translate numeric results into interpretable participation levels for clinicians, survivors, and researchers ^[36]. The Community Integration Questionnaire, in its burn-validated CIQ-13 form, addresses self/family care and social integration ^[35]. A school-aged observer-reported LIBRE measure has been developed to extend assessment to children ^[36]. Education level combined with age at injury has been proposed as a quick screen to identify survivors at risk of difficult social reintegration who might be targeted for additional peer support and counseling, since the association between education and social recovery held only for those burned at age 30 or younger ^[47]. Sex differences are relevant to assessment: men scored significantly better than women on several LIBRE scales, differences not substantially reduced by adjustment ^[48].

Management¶

The management implications drawn by this literature are about access and integration rather than a defined protocol. Given its role in psychosocial recovery, expanding peer-support access and integrating it into routine care has been proposed as a way to optimize rehabilitation outcomes ^[2], and health professionals are described as instrumental in connecting survivors to community support organizations ^[10]. Priority psychosocial target areas named in survivorship reviews are developing social skills, addressing body-image concerns, and providing peer support ^[10]. Active coping strategies for social situations, such as positive reframing, humor, and pre-empting questions, can be taught, which underscores the role of peer support, family support, education, and social-skills training ^[37]. An interview study of survivors with significant burns found that optimistic personality, positive coping styles, and social support played very important roles in recovery, that the availability of a mentor was beneficial, and that coping instruction such as searching for a mentor and promoting recreation should be taught by health professionals in burn care units ^[72].

Social support can also be a deliberate target of nursing and intervention design. A latent-profile analysis of benefit-finding among burn survivors concluded that, by improving patients' awareness of available social support and providing additional social resources, clinical burn nursing staff can help enhance survivors' sense of benefit-finding from their disease experience, and that the authors advised attention to patients' emotions and their social-support networks when designing interventions for those with a low degree of benefit-finding ^[74].

Caregivers are part of the management surface. A cognitive-stimulation-therapy intervention for caregivers of burn patients improved burn awareness, quality of life, social-support utilization, and psychological resilience ^[57]. Family members are an important source of short- and long-term support for survivors ^[21], and the burn team that supports the family is, by this evidence, also supporting the survivor.

Special considerations¶

Pediatric and adolescent populations¶

Children and adolescents carry distinct reintegration challenges. The literature comparing social competence between pediatric survivors and peers is mixed, with some studies finding normal-range competence and others documenting social deficits ^[27]. Bullying is common: 61 percent of burn-surviving children in one study reported being bullied at school, and 68 percent of those with visible scars reported bullying as a problem versus 54 percent with hidden scars ^[67]. Family members of young-adult survivors report more behavioral problems for their relatives than informants of a reference population, supporting a need for routine follow-up into adulthood ^[58]. Reassuringly, burn survivors injured as children fared at least as well as those burned as adults across a broad range of long-term social-participation outcomes, with early differences disappearing after adjustment ^[70].

Families and caregivers¶

Families are often in crisis immediately after the injury, and extended family, friends, the burn team, and other affected families are important sources of support ^[21]. For partners, role changes and sexual concerns can be prominent, and few studies extend beyond the hospitalization period ^[21]. In a Malawian support group, caregivers voiced guilt and self-blame, fears about emotional distance, and worries about stigma, while the group provided a venue to share experience and coping techniques ^[63].

Cultural, geographic, and gender context¶

Reintegration is shaped by context. Racial and ethnic disparities in community-integration trajectories persist after accounting for age, sex, TBSA, rehabilitation days, and range-of-motion deficits, with additional resources recommended for Black and Hispanic survivors ^[34]. Geospatial analysis found counties with consistent declines in community-integration scores had higher poverty, unemployment, and crime, supporting telehealth, peer-support referral at discharge, and local-resource guidance for survivors facing environmental barriers ^[54]. Women's reintegration narratives emphasize needs for personal support, the complexity of intimate relationships, and the role of religion and spirituality ^[59]. Veterans with combat burns describe supportive communities and future-oriented thinking, both buoyed by peer support ^[61]. In settings where burn rehabilitation is underdeveloped, survivor organizations and children's summer camps that aid self-confidence and community integration have been hard to establish, with lack of funding a principal barrier ^[63], and a Latin American camp had measurable impact on campers' anxiety, depression, and self-esteem, with 42 percent never having slept away from home since their injury ^[64]. Reconstructive surgery in a low-resource setting improved patient-reported disability, family-life impact, and social exclusion, including a decline in witchcraft attribution ^[69].

Outcomes¶

The honest summary is that survivors and families perceive substantial benefit from peer contact and camps, while controlled evidence of effect on standardized outcomes is limited and inconsistent. On the perceived-benefit side, the qualitative and program-evaluation literature is strikingly consistent across modalities and decades ^[3,5,11,26]. On the measured-outcome side, the strongest community-integration signal is modest: peer-support attendance was associated with increased social-interaction scores by 17 percent of a standard deviation, reported as the first association between support-group attendance and improved community reintegration in burn survivors ^[4]. By contrast, a more recent Burn Model System analysis found that initial univariate advantages in social role, anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction among peer-support users disappeared after adjustment, with no significant outcome differences between groups ^[2]. Social participation itself remains a meaningful predictor of quality of life and a rational rehabilitation target regardless of which delivery vehicle is used ^[50].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps¶

The central controversy is the gap between perceived and demonstrated efficacy. For burn camps, findings were described as less consistent than for other modalities, with eight articles suggesting psychological improvement and three reporting no significant psychosocial effect ^[5]. A systematic review captured the tension directly: quantitative data did not support any long-lasting impact on psychosocial well-being, even though qualitative data showed children, parents, and staff all perceived benefits such as companionship and belonging, and the authors called for research to explain the incongruence between qualitative and quantitative findings ^[71]. Evidence about burn-camp effectiveness has been called equivocal ^[26].

Peer-support efficacy is similarly underpowered. A review of peer-support group programs found that despite their popularity there is little information on efficacy, and that while results are encouraging, further study is needed to replicate findings and define optimal implementation ^[5]. The one-to-one scoping review described its evidence as preliminary ^[6], and qualitative work on survivors who become peer supporters frames peer support as a promising resource in burn rehabilitation that warrants further investigation ^[8]. Peer support is also paradoxically underused by the survivors who might benefit: relatively few attend ^[9], and a needs study suggested an existing misconception that peer support is meant only for people in great need and distress ^[9].

The broader rehabilitation evidence base is thin. Less than 1 percent of clinical rehabilitation research and of rehabilitation randomized trials addresses burns, and very few studies use function or return to community-based activity as outcomes ^[65]. When articles were screened for rehabilitation plus functional outcome plus guideline vetting, only seven remained, and only one was community-based, reflecting a paucity of clinical practice guidelines, very few intervention trials, rare randomized trials, and little patient input ^[66]. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for people with visible differences found that none of twelve papers adequately demonstrated clinical effectiveness, calling for more randomized and experimental studies ^[68].

These gaps do not negate the survivor-reported value of peer support and camps; they bound how confidently any program can be presented as outcome-changing. The reintegration problem is real and survivor-prioritized ^[1]; the programmatic responses are widely valued but unevenly evidenced; and the field's most-needed contribution is controlled, function-anchored evaluation of the interventions survivors already use.

References¶

[1] Blakeney P, Partridge J, Rumsey N. "Community integration." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2007. PMID: 17665521. ↩

[2] Johnson D, McMullen K, Flores E, et al. "Exploring the Impact of Peer Support on Burn Survivor Recovery: A Burn Model System Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40757526. ↩

[3] Kornhaber R, Wilson A, Abu-Qamar M, et al. "Inpatient peer support for adult burn survivors-a valuable resource: a phenomenological analysis of the Australian experience." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 24927991. ↩

[4] Grieve B, Shapiro GD, Wibbenmeyer L, et al. "Long-Term Social Reintegration Outcomes for Burn Survivors With and Without Peer Support Attendance: A LIBRE Study." Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2020. PMID: 29097179. ↩

[5] Won P, Bello MS, Stoycos SA, et al. "The Impact of Peer Support Group Programs on Psychosocial Outcomes for Burn Survivors and Caregivers: A Review of the Literature." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 33677491. ↩

[6] Tolley JS, Foroushani PS. "What do we know about one-to-one peer support for adults with a burn injury? A scoping review." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2014. PMID: 23877134. ↩

[7] Badger K, Royse D. "Adult burn survivors' views of peer support: a qualitative study." Social work in health care 2010. PMID: 20379901. ↩

[8] Badger K, Royse D. "Helping others heal: burn survivors and peer support." Social work in health care 2010. PMID: 20077316. ↩

[9] Papamikrouli E, van Schie CM, Schoenmaker J, et al. "Peer Support Needs Among Adults With Burns." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2017. PMID: 27606560. ↩

[10] Badger K, Acton A, Peterson P. "Aftercare, Survivorship, and Peer Support." Clinics in plastic surgery 2017. PMID: 28888313. ↩

[11] Davis T, Gorgens K, Shriberg J, et al. "Making meaning in a burn peer support group: qualitative analysis of attendee interviews." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2014. PMID: 24378781. ↩

[12] Williams RM, Patterson DR, Schwenn C, et al. "Evaluation of a peer consultation program for burn inpatients." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2002. PMID: 12432323. ↩

[13] Chedekel DS, Tolias CL. "Adolescents' perceptions of participation in a burn patient support group." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2001. PMID: 11482691. ↩

[14] Rahimkhani M, Mohammadabadi A, Askari M, et al. "Investigating the impact of patient-centered peer counseling on anxiety and pain among burn patients: A randomized controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 39181768. ↩

[15] Cristall N, Kohja Z, Gawaziuk JP, et al. "Narrative discourse of burn injury and recovery on peer support websites: A qualitative analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33246671. ↩

[16] Giordano MS. "CE: Original Research: The Lived Experience of Social Media by Young Adult Burn Survivors." The American journal of nursing 2016. PMID: 27428507. ↩

[17] Abrams TE, Lloyd AA, Elzey LE, et al. "The Bridge: A mobile application for burn patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30377005. ↩

[18] Heath J, Williamson H, Williams L, et al. "Supporting children with burns: Developing a UK parent-focused peer-informed website to support families of burn-injured children." Patient education and counseling 2019. PMID: 30962077. ↩

[19] Bayuo J, Wong FKY, Chung LYF. "Effect of a transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors: A randomised controlled trial." Clinical rehabilitation 2024. PMID: 39191373. ↩

[21] Sundara DC. "A review of issues and concerns of family members of adult burn survivors." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2011. PMID: 21422946. ↩

[22] Biggs KS, Heinrich JJ, Jekel JF, et al. "The burn camp experience: variables that influence the enhancement of self-esteem." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1997. PMID: 9063796. ↩

[23] Arnoldo BD, Crump D, Burris AM, et al. "Self-esteem measurement before and after summer burn camp in pediatric burn patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2006. PMID: 17091072. ↩

[24] Bakker A, Van der Heijden PG, Van Son MJ, et al. "Impact of pediatric burn camps on participants' self esteem and body image: an empirical study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2011. PMID: 21752547. ↩

[25] Rimmer RB, Pressman MS, Takach OP, et al. "Burn-injured adolescents report gaining multiple developmental benefits and improved life skills as a result of burn camp attendance." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22210080. ↩

[26] Neill JT, Goch I, Sullivan A, et al. "The role of burn camp in the recovery of young people from burn injury: A qualitative study using long-term follow-up interviews with parents and participants." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 34607728. ↩

[27] Szabo MM, Ferris KA, Urso L, et al. "Social competence in pediatric burn survivors: A systematic review." Rehabilitation psychology 2017. PMID: 27929325. ↩

[28] Cox ER, Call SB, Williams NR, et al. "Shedding the layers: exploring the impact of the burn camp experience on adolescent campers' body image." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2004. PMID: 14726756. ↩

[29] Williams NR, Reeves PM, Cox ER, et al. "Creating a social work link to the burn community: a research team goes to burn camp." Social work in health care 2004. PMID: 15149913. ↩

[30] Armstrong-James L, Cadogan J, Williamson H, et al. "Using Photo-Elicitation to Explore Families' Experiences of Burn Camp." Journal of family nursing 2019. PMID: 30556443. ↩

[31] Schei V, Guttormsen AB, Lernevall LST, et al. "Parental experiences, coping and the impact of Family Burn Camp after paediatric burn injury: A qualitative study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 39721244. ↩

[32] Saquib SF, Slinkard-Barnum S, Navis IL, et al. "Pediatric Burn Care: How Burn Camps Survived and Thrived During the Coronavirus Pandemic." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 35986412. ↩

[33] Esselman PC, Ptacek JT, Kowalske K, et al. "Community integration after burn injuries." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2001. PMID: 11403244. ↩

[34] Pierce BS, Perrin PB, Pugh M, et al. "Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Longitudinal Trajectories of Community Integration After Burn Injury." American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2020. PMID: 31876543. ↩

[35] Gerrard P, Kazis LE, Ryan CM, et al. "Validation of the Community Integration Questionnaire in the adult burn injury population." Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2015. PMID: 25986908. ↩

[36] Kazis LE, Marino M, Ni P, et al. "Development of the life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) profile: assessing burn survivors' social participation." Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2017. PMID: 28493205. ↩

[37] Martin L, Byrnes M, McGarry S, et al. "Social challenges of visible scarring after severe burn: A qualitative analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 27576930. ↩

[38] Nguyen NT, Lorrain M, Pognon-Hanna JN, et al. "Barriers and facilitators to work reintegration and burn survivors' perspectives on educating work colleagues." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27338178. ↩

[39] Lamble M, Seto V, Ye Z, et al. "Perceived Value of a Knowledge Translation Intervention Designed to Facilitate Burn Survivors' Work Reintegration." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31231755. ↩

[40] Esselman PC. "Community integration outcome after burn injury." Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America 2011. PMID: 21624726. ↩

[41] Pan R, Dos Santos BD, Nascimento LC, et al. "School reintegration of pediatric burn survivors: An integrative literature review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 28624354. ↩

[42] Michael AI, Ademola SA, Olawoye OA, et al. "Time to return to school in child and adolescent burn patients from a sub-Saharan tertiary hospital." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31843282. ↩

[43] Saret CJ, Ni P, Marino M, et al. "Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A LIBRE Profile Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31069384. ↩

[44] Ohrtman EA, Shapiro GD, Wolfe AE, et al. "Sexual activity and romantic relationships after burn injury: A LIBRE study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 32948357. ↩

[45] Ryan CM, Shapiro GD, Rencken CA, et al. "The Impact of Burn Size on Community Participation: A LIBRE Study." Annals of surgery 2022. PMID: 33351466. ↩

[46] Schneider JC, Shie VL, Espinoza LF, et al. "Impact of Work-Related Burn Injury on Social Reintegration Outcomes: A LIBRE Study." Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2020. PMID: 29183751. ↩

[47] Schulz JT, Shapiro GD, Acton A, et al. "The Relationship of Level of Education to Social Reintegration after Burn Injury: A LIBRE Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31067572. ↩

[48] Levi B, Kraft CT, Shapiro GD, et al. "The Associations of Gender With Social Participation of Burn Survivors: A LIBRE Profile Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2018. PMID: 29733365. ↩

[49] Padalko A, Cristall N, Gawaziuk JP, et al. "Social Complexity and Risk for Pediatric Burn Injury: A Systematic Review." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 30918946. ↩

[50] Reutimann ED, McMullen K, Ryan CM, et al. "The relationship between social participation and health-related quality of life two years after burn injury: A Burn Model System national database study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41946291. ↩

[51] Al-Ghabeesh SH. "Coping strategies, social support, and mindfulness improve the psychological well-being of Jordanian burn survivors: A descriptive correlational study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 34696949. ↩

[52] Ajoudani F, Jasemi M, Lotfi M. "Social participation, social support, and body image in the first year of rehabilitation in burn survivors: A longitudinal, three-wave cross-lagged panel analysis using structural equation modeling." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29776862. ↩

[53] Deng H, Abouzeid CA, Ni P, et al. "The role of personal social networks in social participation for adult burn survivors: A cohort study." Clinical rehabilitation 2026. PMID: 41411188. ↩

[54] Kim P, Kim D, Scotch R, et al. "Geospatial analysis of community-level social and environmental barriers for adult burn injury survivors in North Texas." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40286608. ↩

[55] Elameen AM, Dahy AA, Gad AA. "The Risk of Depression Among Burn Injury Survivors; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of epidemiology and global health 2025. PMID: 41272346. ↩

[56] Thombs BD, Bresnick MG, Magyar-Russell G. "Depression in survivors of burn injury: a systematic review." General hospital psychiatry 2006. PMID: 17088165. ↩

[57] Zhang C, Qin B, Zhang G, et al. "The Impact of Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy on Caregivers of Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 39478360. ↩

[58] Russell W, Holzer CE, Robert RS, et al. "Differences in behavioral perceptions between young adult burn survivors and cross-informants." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2008. PMID: 18695613. ↩

[59] Dekel B, van Niekerk A. "Women's recovery, negotiation of appearance, and social reintegration following a burn." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29395394. ↩

[60] Boersma-van Dam E, Shepherd L, van de Schoot R, et al. "The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Health psychology review 2025. PMID: 39511919. ↩

[61] Murray SJ, Cancio LC. "The Phenomenon of Community Reintegration for Veterans with Burn Injury: Supportive Communities and Future-Oriented Thinking." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 31808802. ↩

[62] Xie WG. "[Burn rehabilitation and community reintegration-new challenge to burn surgery in China]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2010. PMID: 21223648. ↩

[63] Barnett BS, Mulenga M, Kiser MM, et al. "Qualitative analysis of a psychological supportive counseling group for burn survivors and families in Malawi." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 27743733. ↩

[64] Tropez-Arceneaux LL, Castillo Alaniz AT, Lucia Icaza I, et al. "The Psychological Impact of First Burn Camp in Nicaragua." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2017. PMID: 27893579. ↩

[65] Gerber LH, Bush H, Holavanahalli R, et al. "A scoping review of burn rehabilitation publications incorporating functional outcomes." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 31203869. ↩

[66] Gerber LH, Deshpande R, Prabhakar S, et al. "Paucity of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Burn Survivors." American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2020. PMID: 32282360. ↩

[67] Rimmer RB, Foster KN, Bay CR, et al. "The reported effects of bullying on burn-surviving children." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2007. PMID: 17438488. ↩

[68] Bessell A, Moss TP. "Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature." Body image 2007. PMID: 18089269. ↩

[69] Dumont S, Msangi S, Ponthus S, et al. "Health-Related Quality of Life and Social Reintegration Indicators Following Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study." World journal of surgery 2025. PMID: 40635168. ↩

[70] Cartwright S, Saret C, Shapiro GD, et al. "Burn survivors injured as children exhibit resilience in long-term community integration outcomes: A life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30850227. ↩

[71] Kornhaber R, Visentin D, Kaji Thapa D, et al. "Burn camps for burns survivors-Realising the benefits for early adjustment: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 30638667. ↩

[72] Wu J, Zhai J, Liu GX. "Coping strategies of eight patients with significant burn injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19692908. ↩

[73] Kim KM, Ban MS. "Rebuilding Life after Burn Injuries in Korea: Using Photovoice." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31284294. ↩

[74] Juan Z, Jie G, Xiaowen Z, Haifen L, Xuejun C. "Understanding benefit finding among burn survivors: A latent profile analysis study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40058287. ↩