Resilience, coping, and post-traumatic growth after burn
Summary
- What it covers: Positive psychological adaptation after burn, including resilience, coping styles, post-traumatic growth, optimism, self-efficacy, and meaning-making [1,2].
- Clinical bounds: Adults and children, from acute hospitalization through years of community life, across civilian and combat burn populations [3,4].
- Core principles: Most survivors adapt, growth and distress coexist, and active coping with social support drives better outcomes more than burn size does [2,5].
- Watch for: Avoidant coping and low social support mark survivors at risk of a chronic maladjustment trajectory [6,7].
Key Points
- Recognize: Burn survivors report post-traumatic growth much as other trauma populations do, with growth and distress coexisting rather than excluding each other [2]. Overview
- Recognize: Burn severity correlates only weakly with how well a survivor adapts; subjective appraisal, personality, and social resources carry more weight [8,9]. Outcomes
- Recognize: The majority of severely burned children and adults reach adjustment within the normal range over time [4,5]. Epidemiology
- Immediate action: Identify the coping resources to reinforce early, since active and problem-focused coping, optimism, self-efficacy, and perceived support track with better adjustment [10,9]. Management
- Watch for: Avoidant coping and low social support track with poorer adjustment and distinguish the chronic distress trajectory from the resilient one, warranting early attention [6,7]. Outcomes
- Unresolved: Positive adaptation is framed as resilience or post-traumatic growth depending on the trajectory and process, and the two constructs are inconsistently distinguished across studies [1]. Controversies and Evidence Gaps
- Special populations: Combat-injured veterans, survivors lacking self-esteem and family support, and young children each show distinct adaptation pathways and resources [3,12,4]. Special Considerations
Overview¶
A burn is a trauma, and like other traumas it produces a fuller range of outcomes than distress alone. Burn survivors report post-traumatic growth in the same way that other populations exposed to trauma and adversity do [2]. Positive adaptation after such an injury is known as resilience or post-traumatic growth, depending on the trajectory and the underlying process [1]. The clinically useful point is that growth and distress are not opposites on a single dial. A survivor can carry trauma symptoms and at the same time report a greater appreciation of life, closer relationships, and a stronger sense of personal strength [13].
The reason this matters at the bedside is that the strongest levers on long-term psychosocial outcome are not the ones a surgeon controls in the operating room. Burn size and severity predict adaptation weakly and inconsistently, while a survivor's coping style, personality, appraisal of the injury, and access to social support predict it more reliably [9,10]. A clinician who reads this literature should come away interested less in the percentage of body surface burned and more in how a given patient is coping, who is supporting them, and whether the resources that protect against chronic distress are present. Trauma itself can erode those resources: trauma affects coping mechanisms and a person's capacity to manage and respond to stressors and to recover [14]. The work of burn psychosocial care is in large part the work of protecting and rebuilding that capacity.
Epidemiology¶
Positive adaptation is the common outcome, not the exception. In a prospective study of young burn-injured children, the majority were resilient [4]. Severely burned children frequently reach normative adjustment: in one sample of children with 80 percent or greater total body surface area burns, behavioral problems reported by both parents and teachers were within normal limits [15], and in another such cohort, survivors and their parents were within normal limits on all objective measures, with adjustment neither improving nor deteriorating over time [5]. Among adolescents with extensive burns, roughly half scored within the normal range on a measure of psychological adjustment [16]. A long-term study similarly described a group of young burn survivors of average intelligence, still in school or otherwise employed, and within normal limits [17].
Growth is also frequently reported, though estimates vary by instrument and population. A systematic review of post-traumatic growth in burn patients found a mean Posttraumatic Growth Inventory score of 54.08 out of 105, a moderate level [18]. One adult study found burn survivors experienced growth to a lesser degree than earlier work had suggested, with a geometric mean of 1.26 on a 0 to 4.67 range [8]. These figures coexist with substantial distress, which is why prevalence of growth and prevalence of impairment are best read side by side rather than as competing summaries of the same population.
Pathophysiology¶
The mechanism by which a burn becomes either chronic distress or growth is psychological and social rather than anatomical. Children's resilience in the face of severe injury depends heavily on basic human protective systems operating in their favor, the central conclusion of developmental resilience research [19]. When those systems are intact, families and communities included, the same injury that overwhelms one survivor is metabolized by another. Clinical experience has long noted this divergence directly: some burn patients show remarkable emotional resilience while others are more seriously affected [1].
Post-traumatic growth in burn survivors maps onto the established trauma model. Growth occurs in areas including a greater appreciation of life and changed priorities, warmer and more intimate relationships, a greater sense of personal strength, recognition of new possibilities, and spiritual development [13]. A phenomenological study of Chinese burn patients found commonalities with the Tedeschi and Calhoun model of the process and outcomes of growth, while noting that growth "for the significant others" was an important local facet and that clear spiritual or religious growth was less evident in that sample [20]. Survivors describe the process as a restorying of the self, with narratives of positive, transformative, and resilient healing that reflect a rebirth of the self and a recovery of meaning standing alongside the harder narratives [21]. Resilience in that framing is multidimensional and relational, acknowledging the deficits while recognizing the pathways to growth, healing, and meaning [21].
Assessment¶
Resilience, coping, and growth are measurable, and several instruments have been used in burn populations. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory functions as a brief screening tool; one evaluation found it a five-minute screen that adequately identifies the presence or absence of growth in burn survivors and can guide intervention [22]. Coping style has been characterized with the Coping With Burns Questionnaire, which on cluster analysis of burned adults yielded three coping patterns: extensive, adaptive, and avoidant copers [23]. The same questionnaire is sensitive enough to detect specific behaviors, including alcohol use as a coping item in acute care [24]. Resilience and self-efficacy have been measured together with quality of life, with significant positive correlations among resilience and self-efficacy, resilience and quality of life, and self-efficacy and quality of life in burned patients [25].
Structured psychosocial assessment extends beyond a single construct. Authors of a psychometric study advised structured assessment of patient depression, anxiety, substance abuse, social support, and willingness to take control of and responsibility for health care, supplemented by assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder and of personality and coping styles [26]. The clinical rationale is that survivors at risk for poor adjustment after discharge may be identifiable during hospitalization, so that preventive strategies can be directed at them [27]. Early standardized screening, paired with assessment of related domains such as body image dissatisfaction, can facilitate detection of those who will struggle.
Outcomes¶
The central finding across this literature is that subjective and dispositional factors, not injury magnitude, drive how a survivor adapts. Personality matters: successful coping was positively related to extroversion, optimism, self-mastery, and hope, and negatively related to neuroticism and social anxiety [9]. Coping style matters: the more adjusted burn survivors used more problem-solving coping responses and fewer avoidance responses [10], optimism was the most commonly used coping strategy in one return-to-work cohort [28], and adaptive copers favored emotional support and optimism or problem solving and reported the highest health status while avoidant copers reported the lowest [23]. Self-efficacy, optimism, and perceived social support appear together as the psychosocial resources survivors draw on during recovery [29]. A qualitative study of significantly burned patients similarly found that optimistic personality, positive coping styles, and social support played very important roles in their recovery [30].
Coping resources and outcomes link prospectively. Seeking social support moderated the association between pain and post-traumatic stress symptoms in a prospective study [11], and confrontive coping, social support, and mindfulness were each significantly associated with better psychological well-being in burn survivors [31]. Self-efficacy is consistently bound up with resilience and quality of life, with significant positive correlations among all three [25]. Where these resources are absent, the picture inverts: low self-esteem, lack of family support, and lack of available resources leave survivors dissatisfied with life [12], and avoidant coping, unemployment, and loss of occupational status are associated with poorer psychosocial adjustment [6].
Adaptation follows distinguishable trajectories rather than a single course. A prospective longitudinal study of post-traumatic stress symptoms after burn identified four clusters: resilient, with low symptoms that decreased over time; recovery, with high symptoms that gradually decreased; delayed, with moderate symptoms that increased over time; and chronic, with high symptoms throughout [7]. Early acute post-trauma distress flags the survivors at risk of the worse trajectories: injury severity together with state negative affect and dispositional optimism-pessimism moderated the impact of acute distress on physical, though not psychosocial, adjustment [32]. Older clinical work mapped adjustment into recurring cluster patterns by examining patients' cognitive, affective, and behavioral styles, including their use of denial and the ways hostility is managed [33]. The practical implication is that adaptation can be tracked over time and that early signals carry prognostic weight.
The literature is not uniformly optimistic, and a minority remain impaired. A long-term adult follow-up identified a constellation of variables, including length of hospital stay, presence of scars, premorbid psychopathology, and experiencing a death threat at the time of injury, as marking the survivors who fared worse [34]. The balanced reading is that most survivors adapt and many grow, while a recognizable subgroup follows a chronic course and is the appropriate target for intervention.
Special Considerations¶
Children and adolescents¶
Children's adaptation depends on the protective systems around them, especially the family. Positive psychological adjustment in burned children was predicted by greater family cohesion, independence, and more open expressiveness within the family [16], and a child's adaptation is complicated when the child resides in a chaotic or dysfunctional family [35]. The parent's role in facilitating the acquisition of a positive self-image emerged as a primary factor influencing adaptation in disfigured children [36]. Parental and peer support are identified as major contributors to higher self-esteem and adaptation [35]. Adolescents describe their own coping in both problem-focused terms, such as resuming a pre-burn style of dress and instituting comfort measures, and emotion-focused terms, such as acceptance of limitations and anticipation of ridicule [37]. Resilience in children is also detectable on projective testing: in one study, resilient burned children and adolescents gave more cooperative-movement responses and were less likely to show a coping deficit than their nonresilient peers [38]. The data can look paradoxical: children who survive massive burn injuries can achieve positive psychosocial adaptation even after catastrophic injury [5], which is why developmental resilience is best understood as protective systems doing their work [19] rather than as the absence of injury.
Combat-injured service members and veterans¶
Combat burn survivors show notable resilience that the literature is still working to explain. A postdischarge cause-of-death analysis of combat-related burn patients found no indication of suicide, suggesting resilience in this population and prompting a call for further research into its sources [3]. A study comparing burn survivors with and without military service history found no significant differences in outcome measures between the groups [39]. Qualitative work with veterans identified supportive communities and future-oriented thinking as the two major themes of their reintegration, where future-oriented thinking describes a turning point in recovery, a desire to serve others, and the development of new meaning in life [40].
Women, culture, and meaning-making¶
Appraisal and meaning-making carry particular weight for some groups. Among female burn survivors with facial disfigurement, low self-esteem and lack of family support and resources predicted dissatisfaction with life [12]. Religion and spirituality appear repeatedly as coping resources: burn patients given the opportunity to talk about what helps them cope frequently credit their religious faith [41], and trauma survivors who rely on spiritual or religious beliefs may show a greater capacity for growth [13]. Emotional resources have been studied as targets for supporting positive adaptation that promotes quality of life and emotional well-being after burn [42]. Cultural context shapes which facets of growth are most salient, as the emphasis on growth for significant others in a Chinese cohort illustrates [20].
Management¶
Management here means fostering the resources that protect adaptation, framed honestly as options of varying evidence strength rather than as settled prescriptions. Trauma-informed care provides the organizing frame: moving the lenses of trauma into the burn-care setting reorients staff toward the survivor's capacity to manage and recover from stressors [14]. Across the recovery arc, redefining a personal sense of normal is part of emerging from the acute trauma, and early rehabilitation can be strengthened by promoting carer involvement, patient self-efficacy, and peer support [43].
Several approaches target coping and self-efficacy directly. Encouraging positive coping strategies and strengthening a survivor's sense of self-efficacy and occupational identity can help the survivor participate actively in recovery and thereby increase resilience [44]. Lived-experience work identifies insight, goal setting, self-efficacy, optimism, and humor as themes of intellectual health that survivors draw on [45]. One author group recommended that health policymakers adopt strategies to improve resilience and self-efficacy so that burned patients can cope more effectively with the stresses of injury [25].
Mind-body and acceptance-based approaches show early signal. Mindfulness was significantly associated with better psychological well-being and with reduced psychological distress in burn survivors, alongside confrontive coping and social support [31,46]. Psychological flexibility is an active research direction: individuals with appearance anxiety after a visible burn may struggle to accept difficult emotions and to step back from distressing thoughts, the targets of acceptance-based intervention [47]. For growth specifically, clinicians have been advised on how to create an environment that fosters growth and that encourages patients to explore spiritual and religious beliefs in the context of the trauma [13].
Family and narrative approaches round out the toolkit. Parent participation has been used to reduce pediatric burn pain and, in the process, improved parents' coping strategies [48], and promoting the familial support system and the values of autonomy and self-sufficiency is a recurring recommendation [17]. Occupational storytelling has been used in a case report to rebuild coping, self-efficacy, and occupational identity in a survivor with complex psychosocial issues [44]. Where parents themselves carry guilt and shame, those higher in self-compassion report fewer depressive symptoms, pointing to caregivers as a legitimate intervention target [49].
Controversies and Evidence Gaps¶
The largest gap is the thin evidence base for interventions. A review of resilience and post-traumatic growth after burn offered suggestions for interventions to promote growth, such as improving social support, coping styles, and deliberate positive introspection [1]. The constructs themselves overlap and are inconsistently operationalized: resilience and growth are sometimes treated as one outcome and sometimes as distinct trajectories of the same positive-adaptation process [1], which complicates pooling across studies. Much of the strongest descriptive work is qualitative or small, including phenomenological and case-based studies [20,45], and the prospective trajectory work, while informative, comes from a small number of cohorts [7].
The relationship between injury severity and adaptation is genuinely unsettled rather than simply weak. Severity, post-burn functioning, and trauma symptoms each correlated with growth in one study [8], yet burn size and severity are repeatedly described as poor predictors of overall adjustment relative to appraisal and social factors [9,6]. This argues against using burn size as a triage proxy for who will struggle psychologically, but it does not resolve how, mechanistically, severity feeds into the divergent trajectories.
Population and measurement gaps persist. The apparent resilience of combat burn survivors is documented but not explained, and authors call explicitly for research into its sources and for comparisons between civilian and military-service histories [3,39]. Financial and social determinants are only beginning to be examined; financial assistance may aid survivors at greatest risk of financial toxicity without uniformly improving growth scores [50]. The evidence base is therefore richest on description and prediction of adaptation and thinnest on the controlled evaluation of the interventions intended to build it.
References¶
[1] Woolard A, Bullman I, Allahham A, Long T, Milroy H, Wood F. "Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth after Burn: A Review of Barriers, Enablers, and Interventions to Improve Psychological Recovery." European burn journal 2022. PMID: 39604178. ↩
[2] Rosenbach C, Renneberg B. "Positive change after severe burn injuries." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2008. PMID: 18535462. ↩
[3] Escolas SM, Archuleta DJ, Orman JA, Chung KK, Renz EM. "Postdischarge Cause-of-Death Analysis of Combat-Related Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2017. PMID: 26629656. ↩
[4] De Young AC, Kenardy JA, Cobham VE, Kimble R. "Prevalence, comorbidity and course of trauma reactions in young burn-injured children." Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines 2012. PMID: 21671940. ↩
[5] Blakeney P, Meyer W, Robert R, Desai M, Wolf S, Herndon D. "Long-term psychosocial adaptation of children who survive burns involving 80% or greater total body surface area." The Journal of trauma 1998. PMID: 9555833. ↩
[6] Browne G, Byrne C, Brown B, Pennock M, Streiner D, Roberts R. "Psychosocial adjustment of burn survivors." Burns, including thermal injury 1985. PMID: 4063868. ↩
[7] Sveen J, Ekselius L, Gerdin B, Willebrand M. "A prospective longitudinal study of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom trajectories after burn injury." The Journal of trauma 2011. PMID: 21841510. ↩
[8] Baillie SE, Sellwood W, Wisely JA. "Post-traumatic growth in adults following a burn." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 25037992. ↩
[9] Gilboa D, Bisk L, Montag I, Tsur H. "Personality traits and psychosocial adjustment of patients with burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1999. PMID: 10425599. ↩
[10] Roberts JG, Browne G, Streiner D, Byrne C, Brown B, Love B. "Analyses of coping responses and adjustment: stability of conclusions." Nursing research 1987. PMID: 3644265. ↩
[11] Ptacek JT, Patterson DR, Montgomery BK, Heimbach DM. "Pain, coping, and adjustment in patients with burns: preliminary findings from a prospective study." Journal of pain and symptom management 1995. PMID: 7561227. ↩
[12] Habib Z, Saddul R, Kamran F. "Perceptions and experiences of female burn survivors with facial disfigurement." Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi 2021. PMID: 33308964. ↩
[13] Wiechman Askay S, Magyar-Russell G. "Post-traumatic growth and spirituality in burn recovery." International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) 2009. PMID: 19919210. ↩
[14] Cleary M, West S, Kornhaber R, Visentin D, Neil A, Haik J. "Moving the lenses of trauma - Trauma-informed care in the burns care setting." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 32192867. ↩
[15] Blakeney P, Meyer W, Moore P, Murphy L, Broemeling L, Robson M. "Psychosocial sequelae of pediatric burns involving 80% or greater total body surface area." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1993. PMID: 8300704. ↩
[16] Blakeney P, Portman S, Rutan R. "Familial values as factors influencing long-term psychological adjustment of children after severe burn injury." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1990. PMID: 2246319. ↩
[17] Blakeney P, Herndon DN, Desai MH, Beard S, Wales-Seale P. "Long-term psychosocial adjustment following burn injury." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1988. PMID: 3220876. ↩
[18] Kazemi-Sufi S, Bagheri A, Mazhari SA, Farhadi B, Alizadeh-Otaghvar H, Zaboli Mahdiabadi M. "Post-traumatic growth and its explanatory factors in burn patients: A systematic review." International wound journal 2024. PMID: 39401983. ↩
[19] Caffo E, Belaise C. "Psychological aspects of traumatic injury in children and adolescents." Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America 2003. PMID: 12910820. ↩
[20] Zhai J, Liu X, Wu J, Jiang H. "What does posttraumatic growth mean to Chinese burn patients: a phenomenological study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2010. PMID: 20305570. ↩
[21] Lau U, van Niekerk A. "Restorying the self: an exploration of young burn survivors' narratives of resilience." Qualitative health research 2011. PMID: 21490293. ↩
[22] Martin L, Byrnes M, McGarry S, Rea S, Wood F. "Evaluation of the posttraumatic growth inventory after severe burn injury in Western Australia: clinical implications for use." Disability and rehabilitation 2016. PMID: 26963342. ↩
[23] Willebrand M, Andersson G, Kildal M, Ekselius L. "Exploration of coping patterns in burned adults: cluster analysis of the coping with burns questionnaire (CBQ)." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2002. PMID: 12220912. ↩
[24] Sveen J, Öster C. "Alcohol consumption after severe burn: a prospective study." Psychosomatics 2015. PMID: 25553819. ↩
[25] Tehranineshat B, Mohammadi F, Mehdizade Tazangi R, Sohrabpour M, Parviniannasab AM, Bijani M. "A Study of the Relationship Among Burned Patients' Resilience and Self-Efficacy and Their Quality of Life." Patient preference and adherence 2020. PMID: 32801666. ↩
[26] Pruzinsky T, Rice LD, Himel HN, Morgan RF, Edlich RF. "Psychometric assessment of psychologic factors influencing adult burn rehabilitation." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1992. PMID: 1572863. ↩
[27] Roca RP, Spence RJ, Munster AM. "Posttraumatic adaptation and distress among adult burn survivors." The American journal of psychiatry 1992. PMID: 1503138. ↩
[28] Noble J, Gomez M, Fish JS. "Quality of life and return to work following electrical burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2006. PMID: 16448771. ↩
[29] Wallis H, Renneberg B, Ripper S, Germann G, Wind G, Jester A. "Emotional distress and psychosocial resources in patients recovering from severe burn injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2006. PMID: 16998408. ↩
[30] Wu J, Zhai J, Liu GX. "Coping strategies of eight patients with significant burn injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19692908. ↩
[31] Al-Ghabeesh SH. "Coping strategies, social support, and mindfulness improve the psychological well-being of Jordanian burn survivors: A descriptive correlational study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 34696949. ↩
[32] Fauerbach JA, Lawrence JW, Munster AM, Palombo DA, Richter D. "Prolonged adjustment difficulties among those with acute posttrauma distress following burn injury." Journal of behavioral medicine 1999. PMID: 10495968. ↩
[33] Bernstein NR, O'Connell K, Chedekel D. "Patterns of burn adjustment." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1992. PMID: 1572855. ↩
[34] Malt UF, Ugland OM. "A long-term psychosocial follow-up study of burned adults." Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum 1989. PMID: 2624139. ↩
[35] Doctor ME. "Helping the burned child to adapt." Clinics in plastic surgery 1992. PMID: 1633668. ↩
[36] Beard SA, Herndon DN, Desai M. "Adaptation of self-image in burn-disfigured children." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1989. PMID: 2600107. ↩
[37] Sutherland S. "Burned adolescents' descriptions of their coping strategies." Heart & lung : the journal of critical care 1988. PMID: 3350681. ↩
[38] Holaday M, Terrell D. "Resiliency characteristics and Rorschach variables in children and adolescents with severe burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1994. PMID: 7995822. ↩
[39] Surette KE, Abouzeid C, Shepler LJ, McMullen KA, Cancio JM, Cancio LC. "Examining the association between military service history and outcomes after burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 37709564. ↩
[40] Murray SJ, Cancio LC. "The Phenomenon of Community Reintegration for Veterans with Burn Injury: Supportive Communities and Future-Oriented Thinking." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 31808802. ↩
[41] Sherrill KA, Larson DB. "Adult burn patients: the role of religion in recovery." Southern medical journal 1988. PMID: 3393936. ↩
[42] Silva A, Marzo J, García Del Castillo JA. "Relationship between quality of life, emotional symptomology and perceived emotional intelligence in a sample of burn victims." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38494394. ↩
[43] Johnson RA, Taggart SB, Gullick JG. "Emerging from the trauma bubble: Redefining 'normal' after burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27237124. ↩
[44] Kurakazu D, Biggins K, Groger S. "Tell Me Your Story: A Case Report on the Use of Occupational Storytelling in the Treatment of a Subject with an Upper Extremity Burn Injury and Complex Psychosocial Issues." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2022. PMID: 35592884. ↩
[45] Abrams TE, Ogletree RJ, Ratnapradipa D, Neumeister MW. "Adult survivors' lived experience of burns and post-burn health: A qualitative analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 26527372. ↩
[46] Al-Ghabeesh SH, Mahmoud M, Rayan A, Alnaeem M, Algunmeeyn A. "Mindfulness, Social Support, and Psychological Distress Among Jordanian Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38126888. ↩
[47] Shepherd L, Reynolds DP, Turner A, O'Boyle CP, Thompson AR. "The role of psychological flexibility in appearance anxiety in people who have experienced a visible burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30591252. ↩
[48] George A, Hancock J. "Reducing pediatric burn pain with parent participation." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1993. PMID: 8454655. ↩
[49] Hawkins L, Centifanti LCM, Holman N, Taylor P. "Parental Adjustment following Pediatric Burn Injury: The Role of Guilt, Shame, and Self-Compassion." Journal of pediatric psychology 2019. PMID: 30357372. ↩
[50] Martz F, McMullen KA, Carrougher GJ, Bunnell A, Sheckter CC, Wolf SE. "Impacts of Financial Assistance on Quality of Life Among People Living With Burn Injury: Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Database." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 35699664. ↩
Educational reference — not medical advice. Disclaimer