Psychosocial, quality-of-life, and long-term survivor outcomes

Overview

Burn survival is no longer the right frame. Modern burn care reaches survival in most patients who reach a burn center; the long clinical work is what happens after the wounds close ^[4]. Survivors live with a stack of psychosocial sequelae that includes post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and body-image distress ^[3], neuropathic pain ^[7], sleep disturbance ^[42], social-stigma exposure ^[3], functional limitation in return to work ^[10], and difficulty with social reintegration ^[3]. These dimensions interact. Pain and itch feed sleep loss; sleep loss feeds mood disturbance; appearance-related concerns feed social withdrawal; social withdrawal feeds depression. The literature has converged on the view that recovery is multidimensional and that the burn team's responsibility extends past discharge into a coordinated multidisciplinary follow-up arc ^[3].

Family members carry a parallel burden that is increasingly recognized. Parents of pediatric survivors experience post-traumatic stress symptoms within 12 months of their child's injury at clinically significant rates, and partners of adult survivors show reciprocal post-traumatic stress dynamics with the survivor themselves [5, 24]. Burn-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed across the lifespan to make these dimensions tractable for clinical follow-up and for outcomes research [12, 19]. Health-related quality of life remains below population norms even years after injury ^[21], and current systematic reviews continue to identify physical functioning and psychological well-being as the most compromised domains ^[1].

The evidence base assembled here skews recent because of a literature-retrieval artifact (NCBI's 9,999-record cap on a search that returned over 26,000 candidate records); older landmark psychosocial-burn work from the 1980s through the 2010s is largely absent from the locked canon. The clinical themes nevertheless converge across the included literature.

Epidemiology

Burn injury creates a measurable mental-health signal that persists past acute care. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of PTSD in adult burn survivors reported a pooled prevalence of 20.5 percent (95 percent CI 16.4 to 24.6), with prevalence decreasing by about 0.37 percent per month post-burn over time ^[6]. Parents of pediatric burn survivors are also affected; a 2024 systematic review pooled 15 studies and found that PTSS in parents within 12 months following the child's burn ranged from 6 to 49 percent, with parental PTSD prevalence ranging from 4.4 to 22 percent ^[5]. A 2026 Portuguese population-based observational study of hospitalized burn patients identified psychiatric comorbidity as both common and associated with worse clinical and healthcare-burden outcomes ^[26].

Beyond the mental-health axis, burn survivors carry physical-symptom burdens that drive psychosocial impact. Neuropathic pain has been reported in as many as 80 percent of burn patients in some series, with older age, alcohol and substance abuse, current daily smoking, larger percent total body surface area (TBSA) burns, and longer hospitalizations identified as risk factors ^[7]. These chronic symptoms map onto the psychosocial axis through their effect on psychosocial well-being, sleep, and activities of daily living ^[42].

The economic and social footprint is substantial. Residence in highest-distress US ZIP codes more than doubled the odds of unemployment at 6 months post-burn (OR 2.21; 95 percent CI 1.39 to 3.52) in a 2025 Burn Model System analysis; older age, larger burn size, more operations, Black race, and pre-injury unemployment were also independently associated with greater odds of unemployment after injury ^[10].

Self-inflicted burn (SIB) and self-immolation populations represent a distinct epidemiologic subgroup. A 2020 comparative study of long-term outcomes found that SIB patients were more often younger, unmarried, unemployed, male, and struggling with pre-morbid psychiatric issues; SIB injury predicted prolonged mechanical ventilation, hospitalization, and rehabilitation ^[9]. After injury, SIB patients had increased anxiety at 24 months, increased suicidal ideation at 5 years, and worse depression at 10 years compared with non-self-inflicted burn injuries ^[9]. Self-immolation is more common in low-income countries than in high-income countries, and a 2023 systematic review of Iraqi data found that domestic violence, mental-health problems, family conflicts, and financial problems were the most common identified causes ^[8].

Pathophysiology

Several converging biological and psychological mechanisms link the acute burn insult to long-term psychosocial sequelae. Burn injury triggers a hypermetabolic and stress response that is adaptive in the acute phase but can persist for several years, contributing to late complications including myocardial dysfunction and ongoing physiologic stress ^[64]. Central nervous system reorganization driven by inflammation, afferent dysfunction, and pain has been proposed as a mechanism for persistent motor and sensory dysfunction in burn survivors ^[65].

Pruritus and neuropathic pain have a defined peripheral and central mechanism. Post-burn neuropathic pruritus involves both peripheral sensitization and an intact-nociceptor hypothesis; activated keratinocytes secrete inflammatory mediators that increase itch-receptor susceptibility ^[43]. These symptoms then feed psychosocial impact through effects on sleep and activities of daily living ^[42].

On the psychological axis, illness perception correlates strongly with PTSD severity (r = 0.851 in a 2025 mediation study), with negative cognitive emotion regulation acting as a partial mediator ^[25]. Trauma-informed care frameworks describe how a traumatic injury alters coping capacity, with downstream effects on the survivor's ability to manage subsequent stressors during recovery ^[66].

Assessment

Burn-specific patient-reported outcome measures

A 2024 systematic review of burn-specific PROMs identified instruments covering biological, psychological, and social factors across adult and pediatric populations, while flagging that several studies required additional PROMs for a thorough evaluation; the review noted continued development needs in the bio-psycho-social model ^[12]. A 2020 systematic review of HRQL instrument measurement properties found that none of the instruments provided enough evidence on their measurement properties to be highly recommended for routine use; two instruments had somewhat more favorable measurement properties ^[13]. The Burn-Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) and the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile had the best measurement properties ^[13]. The BSHS-B is widely accessible and demonstrated sufficient evidence for most measurement properties ^[13].

Assessment instruments

A 2025 cross-cultural validation study found the BSHS-BE (Latin American Spanish version) to be a valid, reliable tool for assessing HRQoL in burn patients, with good discriminatory ability in patients with hand or face burns, TBSA over 15 percent, those requiring surgical intervention, and those at risk of depressive disorder ^[14]. For young adults, the Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire (YABOQ) is a validated English-language patient-reported outcome assessment across 15 scale domains; cross-cultural validity has been shown for the Spanish YABOQ across Physical Function, Perceived Appearance, Sexual Function, Emotion, Family Function, Family Concern, Satisfaction with Symptom Relief, Satisfaction with Role, Work Reintegration, and Religion scales ^[15].

For pediatric outcomes, the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) is burn-specific for children; the Indian Hindi adaptation has been shown to reliably predict quality of life for children with burns ages 5 to 18 in India ^[16]. The SCAR-Q is a rigorously developed, internationally applicable patient-reported outcome measure for scars across surgical, traumatic, and burn etiologies, with refined Appearance, Symptoms, and Psychosocial Impact scales ^[17]. The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) profile is being calibrated for preschool ages 1 to 5 through item-pool field testing ^[18], and the School-Aged LIBRE (SA-LIBRE) covers physical functioning, psychological functioning (cognitive, behavioral, emotional, resilience, body image), and family-and-social functioning across school, peer relations, and community participation ^[19].

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic preference-based instrument used widely in burn cost-effectiveness work; in burn patients, mean EQ-5D-5L utility values remain below population norm scores ^[21], and the pain/discomfort (PD) domain captures both pain and itching in burn patients, though the POSAS pain and itching items are more sensitive ^[20]. The Burn Model System has developed itch-interference scales calibrated using item response theory, with excellent reliability between the mean and two standard deviations above and moderate concordance (ICC = 0.68) between self- and proxy-report ^[22].

A 2024 Dutch multicenter survey study of 140 patients found that most (84 percent) had no problems with online questionnaires and that 67 percent indicated 15 minutes as an acceptable upper limit; patient opinions varied widely on preferred follow-up frequency ^[23]. The findings supported routine PROM use in burn care while emphasizing careful outcome selection ^[23].

Screening for mental health

Early screening and identification of burn survivors who need specialist psychological care are recurring themes in the literature [26, 39]. Screening for PTSD symptoms in burn survivors and their partners is supported by longitudinal multicenter data showing reciprocal symptom dynamics between survivors and partners ^[24]. Geographic-distress-based screening (e.g., distressed-community-index by ZIP code) has been proposed as a tool to focus vocational rehabilitation resources ^[10].

Management

Mental-health sequelae

Psychological intervention trials in the burn population have used several modalities. A 2025 randomized controlled trial of dignity therapy in patients with burns showed that the intervention significantly decreased anxiety and depression and increased burn-specific health scores at 8 weeks post-intervention ^[30]. A 2022 RCT of occupation-based interventions for hand-burn survivors found that occupation-based interventions were as effective as traditional therapeutic interventions for improving anxiety, depression, and sleep quality ^[31]. A 2026 systematic review of stigma after facial burns reported that psychological counseling, resilience training, and reconstructive surgery improved social reintegration and reduced stigma ^[2].

Several adjunctive non-pharmacologic modalities have shown effect on anxiety. Music therapy during burn dressing change reduced both pain percentages (RR 0.06; 95 percent CI 0.01 to 0.41) and pain scores in a 2022 meta-analysis of 7 studies ^[32]. Anxiety scores in burn patients receiving music therapy during dressing change were significantly lower than in routine dressing change groups (SMD -0.64; 95 percent CI -1.09 to -0.19) ^[32]. Rose-damascene aromatherapy improved sleep quality and reduced anxiety in a 2023 RCT ^[33]. A 2024 sham-controlled trial of acupressure reported significantly better sleep quality and lower state anxiety in the real-acupressure arm ^[34]. The Benson relaxation technique reduced body-image dissatisfaction, pain, and anxiety in a 2023 single-blind RCT ^[35].

Quality of life trajectory

A 2026 meta-analysis of HRQoL after burn injury in low- and middle-income countries identified consistently markedly impaired HRQoL, with the most compromised domains being physical functioning and psychological well-being ^[1]. A 2020 individual-participant-data meta-analysis of HRQoL recovery after burn injury reported that EQ-5D utility scores remained below norm scores of the general population ^[21]. A 2025 prospective multicenter non-inferiority trial of an ICF-based burn rehabilitation program found significant improvements in SF-36 physical health from T1 to T4 (p less than 0.001), while SF-36 mental health showed no significant change ^[40].

Rehabilitative interventions show evidence of benefit on burn-specific HRQoL. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic exercise found significant improvements in burn-specific HRQoL measured by SF-36, BSHS-B, WHOQOL-BREF, and EuroQol-5D, particularly in simple-abilities (mean difference 0.69; 95 percent CI 0.26 to 1.12) and affective domains (MD 1.63; 95 percent CI 1.00 to 2.26) of the BSHS-B ^[37]. A 2023 multicenter study added exercise training to standard burn rehabilitation and showed significant improvement in quadriceps muscle layer thickness, muscle strength, and the BSHS-B hand-function subscale ^[38]. A 2024 RCT of transitional tele-rehabilitation reported statistically significant improvement in simple abilities, affect, interpersonal relationship, and overall quality of life measured by the BSHS-B ^[39]. A 2023 RCT of an augmented-reality coupled pamphlet for face and neck burn rehabilitation reported significant improvement in QOL score and all domains at 6 weeks ^[36].

Pain, itch, and sleep as psychosocial cofactors

Pain and pruritus interact with mood and sleep across the recovery arc. A 2024 Cochrane review of interventions for postburn pruritus included 25 RCTs with 1,166 participants assessing 21 interventions, reporting low-to-moderate certainty evidence for several agents including doxepin cream, gabapentin, ondansetron, enalapril ointment, massage, extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, and pulsed high-intensity laser ^[41]. Massage compared with standard care reduced burn-related pruritus and pain with low-certainty evidence ^[41]. Pulsed high-intensity laser reduced pain compared with placebo laser with moderate-certainty evidence (MD -3.23 VAS; 95 percent CI -5.41 to -1.05) ^[41]. The Cochrane review nevertheless emphasized that secondary outcomes such as cost-effectiveness, patient perception, and HRQoL were not consistently reported in the included trials ^[41].

A 2022 meta-analysis of sleep in burn survivors confirmed detrimental effects of burn injury on sleep quality and reported a large positive effect of sleep-targeted interventions (Hedges's g = 1.04; 95 percent CI z = 3.0; p less than 0.01) ^[44]. Post-burn pruritus and neuropathic pain significantly affect psychosocial well-being, sleep, and activities of daily living ^[42]. Chronic prescription pain-medication use after burn injury was associated with worse physical, mental, and employment outcomes at 12 months in a 2024 Burn Model System analysis ^[45].

Body image, appearance, and stigma

Visible scarring drives a measurable psychosocial signal. A 2026 systematic review of facial-burn stigma found that visible scarring, functional impairments, and low socioeconomic status were associated with more severe stigma and greater psychological distress ^[2]. A 2025 multi-centre prospective cohort study reported that increased psychological flexibility and self-compassion at admission were associated with decreased appearance concerns both cross-sectionally and prospectively at 2- and 6-month follow-up ^[27]. Adults with head and neck burns experience worse long-term outcomes than other burn patients; head and neck burn was a significant predictor of worse anxiety, body image, depression, and life satisfaction at 12 to 24 months post-burn in a 2025 Burn Model System study ^[28]. The scar-management journey is long and complex, with significant physical, psychological, financial, and psychosocial impacts that negatively affect QoL and social reintegration ^[69]. Burn scars produce contractures, body disfigurement, and itching with high emotional impact that adversely affects patient quality of life ^[29].

Social reintegration and return to function

A 2025 narrative review framed holistic burn recovery as requiring a coordinated multidisciplinary approach that incorporates psychological support, social reintegration, and long-term follow-up, beyond physical rehabilitation ^[3]. A 2024 systematic review of functional independence after major burn reported that discharge to independent living from hospital occurred in 27 to 97 percent of patients across studies, while reported return-to-work rates varied from 52 to 80 percent ^[59]. A 2024 systematic review of rehabilitation in adults with burn injury examined fitness level, hand function, edema, pain, pruritus, psychological state, quality of life, range of motion, return to work, strength, scar characteristics, level of impairment, and burn knowledge as the operative outcome set ^[60].

Peer support and the burn community

Peer support group programs are recommended in the literature as a way to facilitate psychosocial recovery and community reintegration after burn injury ^[46]. A 2021 review of peer support included inpatient, outpatient, and integrative groups plus burn camps; 25 articles met inclusion criteria ^[46]. A 2025 Burn Model System study of 1,123 participants found that 17 percent engaged in peer support at 6 months with similar levels at 12 (15 percent) and 24 months (15 percent); peer-support participants had larger burns (27 percent vs 16 percent TBSA), longer hospital stays (41 vs 25 days), and higher education levels than non-users ^[11]. Although initial univariate analyses showed lower social role, anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction scores in peer-support users, adjusted analyses found no significant outcome differences between groups, and peer support was underutilized particularly among patients with smaller burns and lower education levels ^[11]. Burn survivors are also turning to social media and web-based peer-support resources during recovery ^[47]. The Burn Model System program over 25 years has organized peer-support, treatment, assessment-measures, sequelae, employment, and long-term functional-outcomes work into a coherent research program ^[48].

Complications

Longitudinal mental-health dynamics

Beyond prevalence, the longitudinal dynamics of post-traumatic stress in burn survivors are increasingly characterized. A 2022 longitudinal multicenter study of 119 burn-survivor and partner dyads found that within individuals, expressed concern predicted later higher levels of survivor PTSD symptoms, while in their partners, self-regulation and PTSD symptoms reinforced each other in the early phase post-burn; burn severity moderated these effects ^[24]. The study emphasized the importance of screening for and monitoring PTSD symptoms in burn survivors and their partners and of encouraging couple self-disclosure ^[24].

A 2025 single-centre mediation study found that illness perception was positively correlated with PTSD (r = 0.851) and with negative cognitive emotion regulation (r = 0.626) in adult burn survivors ^[25]. A 2026 Portuguese population-based observational study of hospitalized burn patients identified psychiatric comorbidity as common and recommended early psychiatric screening and integrated multidisciplinary care ^[26].

Cervical scar contracture and functional impact

Cervical burn scar contracture affects neck function and quality of life; a 2023 multicenter cohort study identified neck skin grafting as an independent risk factor for scar contracture formation and cervical/cervicothoracic skin grafting as independent risk factors for contracture severity ^[68]. Sensory dysfunction is a long-tail complication; a 2020 study reported hypoesthesia to heat, cold, and touch in postburn skin areas compared with contralateral healthy areas ^[70]. Burn grafting impairs thermoregulation, which may dissuade individuals with grafted burns from physical activity ^[71].

Special populations

Pediatric survivors

Pediatric burn injury produces sequelae across physical function, psychological function, and family/social function. A 2023 narrative review noted that pediatric burn sequelae seriously affect physical function and quality of life, and that rehabilitation exercise training can alleviate negative effects ^[49]. In a 2025 Burn Model System cohort of school-age children, the median days to return to school after hospital discharge was 43 days (IQR 21.5 to 81); return was significantly delayed in adolescents 12 to 14 years old, boys, and children with TBSA at least 5 percent fire/flame injury, inhalation injury, head/neck injury, more operations, or discharge during the school year ^[50].

Pediatric-specific psychosocial interventions show signal in small trials. A 2024 RCT of VR distraction during pediatric dressing change reduced parental anxiety after the dressing was applied (parental anxiety score 0.09 vs 0.64) ^[51]. VR distraction and other procedural-pain interventions in pediatric burn care are characterized more fully in the burn-psychological-interventions and pediatric-burn-care sibling pages [52, 57, 61]; the psychosocial signal carried on this page is the downstream parental-anxiety and caregiver-distress effect.

Caregiver and family burden

Family members of burn survivors carry parallel symptom burdens. A 2024 systematic review found that a considerable proportion of parents experience PTSS within 12 months following their child's burn injury ^[5], and timely targeted psychological support for parents is a recurring theme ^[5]. A 2025 RCT of a resilience training program for mothers and their hospitalized children with burn injuries reported significant reductions in anxiety levels for both mothers and children over time ^[53]. A 2025 RCT of maternal resilience training showed greater improvements in child pain intensity and maternal resilience in the intervention group ^[54]. A 2025 study of individual cognitive stimulation therapy for caregivers reported significantly higher caregiver burn-awareness, quality-of-life dimensions, social support utilization, and psychological resilience in the intervention group ^[55]. Parent first-aid knowledge for pediatric burns is often poor at baseline; a 2023 observational study found that nearly 91 percent of parents did not know first-aid procedures, although about 68 percent knew to use cold running water and 70 percent knew to seek medical care ^[56].

Resilience and post-traumatic growth

A 2024 systematic review of post-traumatic growth (PTG) in burn survivors reported a mean PTG inventory score of 54.08 (SD = 20.46) out of 105, a moderate level ^[58]. Coping strategies, perceived social support, TBSA, religion/spirituality, and severity of burn were identified as positive factors for PTG; depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and physical and mental recovery were negative factors for PTG ^[58].

Self-immolation and self-inflicted-burn populations

Survivors of self-immolation and self-inflicted burn injuries require distinct psychosocial care. A 2025 systematic review of female self-immolation survivors emphasized that recognizing the legal-authority and health-system burden on survivors and their families can reduce burden, enhance quality of life, and facilitate reintegration into society ^[62]. A 2020 long-term comparative study reported that SIB survivors had increased anxiety at 24 months, increased suicidal ideation at 5 years, and worse depression at 10 years compared with non-SIB injuries ^[9], underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary treatment including mental healthcare and long-term follow-up ^[9]. Self-inflicted burn injury was also associated with significantly higher 24-month mortality (OR 4.71; p = 0.010) compared with non-self-inflicted burn injuries ^[9]. Trauma-informed care frameworks offer a structure for engaging this population in the burn-care setting ^[66].

Low- and middle-income contexts

A 2026 systematic review and targeted comparative analysis of HRQoL in burn survivors from low- and middle-income countries identified consistently markedly impaired HRQoL, with physical functioning and psychological well-being as the most compromised domains ^[1]. A 2025 narrative review of integrative physiotherapy in burn rehabilitation observed that culturally sensitive multidisciplinary approaches were associated with better patient satisfaction and community reintegration outcomes ^[63].

Outcomes

Long-term outcomes after burn injury span physical function, mental health, employment, and HRQoL, and current evidence converges on multidimensional impairment that persists beyond wound closure. EQ-5D utility scores remain below population-norm levels even years after injury ^[21]. The most compromised HRQoL domains in pooled analyses are physical functioning and psychological well-being ^[1]. Adults with head and neck burns show worse anxiety, depression, body image, and life satisfaction at 12 to 24 months than burn survivors with non-head-neck injuries ^[28]. Return-to-work rates after major burn vary widely across studies (52 to 80 percent) and are independently shaped by community-distress factors [10, 59]. Pediatric school re-entry is similarly heterogeneous, with median days to school return of 43 in a 2025 BMS cohort ^[50]. Chronic post-burn neuropathic pain and pruritus continue to contribute to psychosocial impact through their effect on sleep, mood, and daily activity ^[42].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps

Evidence quality is mixed. A 2024 Cochrane review of postburn pruritus interventions reported moderate-to-low-certainty evidence on the effects of 21 interventions; many trials did not report secondary outcomes such as cost-effectiveness, patient perception, or HRQoL ^[41]. A 2022 sleep-intervention meta-analysis noted great heterogeneity between existing interventions ^[44]. A 2024 systematic review of neuropathic pain in burn patients concluded that despite afflicting the majority of burn patients long after injury, the evidence on pathophysiology, outcomes, risk factors, and therapeutic efficacy remains insufficient ^[7].

Several methodological gaps are explicit. A 2024 systematic review of PTSS in parents called for standardization of PTSS/PTSD terminology ^[5]. A 2020 systematic review of HRQoL instruments concluded that no instrument provided enough evidence on its measurement properties to be highly recommended for routine use, though two showed somewhat more favorable properties ^[13]. A 2021 study found that mortality-prognostication scores poorly explained variance in SF-12 quality-of-life scores (adjusted R² 0.01 to 0.12), suggesting that survival-oriented scoring systems do not translate to predicting long-term HRQoL ^[67]. A 2024 review of burn-specific PROMs called for additional development to cover the bio-psycho-social model more comprehensively ^[12].

Peer-support outcome evidence is illustrative of the difficulty of measuring psychosocial intervention effect. A 2025 BMS analysis found that initial univariate associations between peer-support use and better social role, anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction scores disappeared in adjusted analyses, leaving the causal effect of peer-support participation ambiguous ^[11]. Engagement with peer-support resources was selective, with smaller burns and lower-education survivors under-represented ^[11].

The locked literature base for this page itself reflects a retrieval-cap artifact. The PubMed search returned over 26,000 candidate records, but the NCBI ESearch single-call limit returned only the first 9,999 by relevance rank. Most landmark psychosocial-burn work from the 1980s through the early 2010s (Fauerbach, Patterson, Daigeler, and others widely cited in the field) is not represented in the locked canon for that reason. This is a known retrieval methodology gap, not a search-design failure; it limits the historical depth of the evidence summarized here. Future pipeline iterations using paginated retrieval are expected to close the gap.

References

[1] Mustehsan MA, Bodla MA, Shehzad MM, et al. "Health-related quality of life in burn survivors from low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and targeted comparative analysis of rehabilitation interventions." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41855789. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41855789/ [2] Niederegger T, Schaschinger T, Karakas E, et al. "Psychological impact and stigma after facial burns: A systematic review." Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2026. PMID: 41152058. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41152058/ [3] Dmitry B, Kornhaber R, Cleary M. "Psychosocial concerns in burn survivors and their families: A narrative review." Injury 2025. PMID: 40753695. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40753695/ [4] Saraswat AB, Holmes JH. "Acute Surgical Management of the Burn Patient." The Surgical clinics of North America 2023. PMID: 37149382. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37149382/ [5] Chouinard NH, Ndongo Sonfack DJ, Chang SL, et al. "Exploring the Prevalence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms in Parents Within 12 Months of Child Burn Injury: A Systematic Review." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38421036. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38421036/ [6] Boersma-van Dam E, Shepherd L, van de Schoot R, et al. "The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Health psychology review 2025. PMID: 39511919. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39511919/ [7] Stanton E, Won P, Manasyan A, et al. "Neuropathic pain in burn patients - A common problem with little literature: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38472004. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38472004/ [8] Ahmed DR. "The epidemiology of self-immolation in Iraq: A systematic review." The International journal of social psychiatry 2023. PMID: 37139597. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37139597/ [9] Gueler JR, McMullen K, Kowalske K, et al. "Exploratory analysis of long-term physical and mental health morbidity and mortality: A comparison of individuals with self-inflicted versus non-self-inflicted burn injuries." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31640886. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31640886/ [10] Agoubi LL, Murphy S, McMullen K, et al. "Association between community distress and return to work after burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 39522135. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39522135/ [11] Johnson D, McMullen K, Flores E, et al. "Exploring the Impact of Peer Support on Burn Survivor Recovery: A Burn Model System Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40757526. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40757526/ [12] Li C, Solish M, Rogers AD. "Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures in burn-specific tools: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38040617. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38040617/ [13] Legemate CM, Spronk I, Mokkink LB, et al. "Evaluation of measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for burns: A systematic review." The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2020. PMID: 31972752. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31972752/ [14] Rodriguez-Parra JD, Navarrete N. "Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Latin American Spanish version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BHSH-BE) questionnaire." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40561815. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40561815/ [15] Brady KJS, Ni P, Grant GG, et al. "Translation and Cross-cultural Validation of the English Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire (YABOQ) in Spanish." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2020. PMID: 31930334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31930334/ [16] Arumugam PK, Thayal PK. "Validation of Indian Adaptation of Burn Outcomes Questionnaire-Hindi Version (I-BOQ-HV) for Pediatric Subgroup 5 to 18 Years." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 33095880. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33095880/ [17] Ziolkowski NI, Pusic AL, Fish JS, et al. "Psychometric Findings for the SCAR-Q Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Based on 731 Children and Adults with Surgical, Traumatic, and Burn Scars from Four Countries." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2020. PMID: 32842115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32842115/ [18] Grant GG, Brady KJS, Stoddard FJ, et al. "Measuring the impact of burn injury on the parent-reported health outcomes of children 1-to-5 years: Item pool development for the Preschool1-5 Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33832799. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33832799/ [19] Rencken CA, Rodríguez-Mercedes SL, Patel KF, et al. "Development of the School-Aged Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (SA-LIBRE5-12) Profile: A Conceptual Framework." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 34228121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34228121/ [20] Spronk I, Bonsel GJ, Polinder S, et al. "Exploring the relation between the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort and pain and itching in a sample of burn patients." Health and quality of life outcomes 2020. PMID: 32429975. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32429975/ [21] Spronk I, Van Loey NEE, Sewalt C, et al. "Recovery of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: An individual participant data meta-analysis." PloS one 2020. PMID: 31923272. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31923272/ [22] Amtmann D, Bamer AM, McMullen K, et al. "Development of Proxy and Self-report Burn Model System Pediatric Itch Interference Scales: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 32810205. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32810205/ [23] Spronk I, van Uden D, van Dammen L, et al. "Outcomes that matter most to burn patients: A national multicentre survey study in the Netherlands." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 37985268. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37985268/ [24] Boersma-van Dam E, van de Schoot R, Engelhard IM, et al. "Posttraumatic stress symptoms and interpersonal processes in burn survivors and their partners." European journal of psychotraumatology 2022. PMID: 36867741. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36867741/ [25] Chen M, Cao R, Wang M, et al. "Relationship between illness perception and post-traumatic stress disorder among adults with burn: The mediation role of cognitive emotion regulation." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40592132. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40592132/ [26] Bastos J, Freitas A, Gandra G, et al. "Psychiatric comorbidity in hospitalised burn patients: A Portuguese population-based observational retrospective study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41830718. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41830718/ [27] Shepherd L, Sirois FM, Harcourt D, et al. "A multi-centre prospective cohort study investigating the roles of psychological flexibility and self-compassion in appearance concerns after burn injuries." British journal of health psychology 2025. PMID: 39358827. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39358827/ [28] Choe D, McMullen K, Stewart BT, et al. "Adults With Head and Neck Burns Experience Worse Long-Term Outcomes and Require More Reconstructive Surgeries: A Burn Model System Study." Annals of plastic surgery 2025. PMID: 39729552. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39729552/ [29] Altemir A, Boixeda P. "Laser Treatment of Burn Scars." Actas dermo-sifiliograficas 2022. PMID: 35963335. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35963335/ [30] Deng Y, Yao Y, Wang C, et al. "Effects of Dignity Therapy on Dignity, Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life for People With Burns: A Randomised Controlled Trial." Journal of advanced nursing 2025. PMID: 39304304. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39304304/ [31] Khanipour M, Lajevardi L, Taghizadeh G, et al. "The investigation of the effects of occupation-based intervention on anxiety, depression, and sleep quality of subjects with hand and upper extremity burns: A randomized clinical trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 35339323. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35339323/ [32] Li Y, Liu FL, Yuan J, et al. "[Meta-analysis of the interventional effects of music therapy on pain and anxiety of burn patients in wound dressing change]." Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi 2022. PMID: 36418266. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36418266/ [33] Mokhtari R, Ajorpaz NM, Abdi K, et al. "The effects of Rosa damascene aromatherapy on anxiety and sleep quality in burn patients: A randomized clinical trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2023. PMID: 35995640. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35995640/ [34] Salajegheh Z, Harorani M, Shahrodi M, et al. "Effects of acupressure on sleep quality and anxiety of patients with second- or third-degree burns: a randomized sham-controlled trial." BMC complementary medicine and therapies 2024. PMID: 38167078. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38167078/ [35] Kutenai HJ, Jafari H, Shafipour V, et al. "Comparison of the effects of Benson relaxation technique and nature sounds on pain, anxiety, and body image in burn-injured patients admitted to the burn ICU: A single-blind randomized clinical trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2023. PMID: 36593137. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36593137/ [36] Zal M, Deldar K, Froutan R, et al. "Rehabilitation of Burn Victims: Improving Quality of Life in Victims With Face and Neck Burn Through an Augmented Reality Coupled Pamphlet." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 35603694. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35603694/ [37] Vigneron L, Martín Núñez J, Zamora Tortosa J, et al. "Effects on health-related quality of life of therapeutic exercise in burn survivors: A systematic review and meta-analyses." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41447903. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41447903/ [38] Schieffelers DR, Dombrecht D, Lafaire C, et al. "Effects of exercise training on muscle wasting, muscle strength and quality of life in adults with acute burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2023. PMID: 37188565. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37188565/ [39] Bayuo J, Wong FKY, Chung LYF. "Effect of a transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors: A randomised controlled trial." Clinical rehabilitation 2024. PMID: 39191373. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39191373/ [40] Harhaus L, Ziegenthaler H, Neubauer H, et al. "A prospective multicenter non-inferiority trial to evaluate a new burn rehabilitation program based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40117998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40117998/ [41] Sinha S, Gabriel VA, Arora RK, et al. "Interventions for postburn pruritus." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2024. PMID: 38837237. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38837237/ [42] Gunawardena DA, Stanley E, Issler-Fisher AC. "Understanding Neural Factors in Burn-related Pruritus and Neuropathic Pain." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 36794899. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36794899/ [43] Chung BY, Kim HB, Jung MJ, et al. "Post-Burn Pruritus." International journal of molecular sciences 2020. PMID: 32485929. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32485929/ [44] Hutchinson KA, Karmali SA, Abi-Jaoude J, et al. "Sleep Quality Among Burn Survivors and the Importance of Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2022. PMID: 35349676. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35349676/ [45] Vu K, Deng H, Kelter B, et al. "Chronic Use of Prescription Pain Medication and Outcomes in Patients With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Study." American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2024. PMID: 38363714. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38363714/ [46] Won P, Bello MS, Stoycos SA, et al. "The Impact of Peer Support Group Programs on Psychosocial Outcomes for Burn Survivors and Caregivers: A Review of the Literature." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 33677491. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33677491/ [47] Cristall N, Kohja Z, Gawaziuk JP, et al. "Narrative discourse of burn injury and recovery on peer support websites: A qualitative analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33246671. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33246671/ [48] Carrougher GJ, McMullen K, Amtmann D, et al. "'Living Well' After Burn Injury: Using Case Reports to Illustrate Significant Contributions From the Burn Model System Research Program." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 32971531. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32971531/ [49] Huo T, Xu XY, Xie WG, et al. "[Research advances on the application of rehabilitation exercise training in pediatric burn rehabilitation]." Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi 2023. PMID: 37805725. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37805725/ [50] Oh GW, Carrougher GJ, deGrauw X, et al. "Factors Impacting Delayed Return to School Among Children Living with Burn Injury: A Burn Model System Study." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40312861. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40312861/ [51] Kilic U, Büyük Tural E, Oruc MA, et al. "The effect of VR headsets used during burn dressing in children on satisfaction and anxiety level of their parents." Journal of pediatric nursing 2024. PMID: 38233321. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38233321/ [52] Jeffs DA, Spray BJ, Baxley L, et al. "Comparing novel virtual reality and nursing standard care on burn wound care pain in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial." Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN 2024. PMID: 38095116. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38095116/ [53] Shaygan M, Dehghan Manshadi Z, Hosseini FA, et al. "Building resilience: A promising approach to reduce anxiety in mothers and hospitalized children with burn injuries." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 39842044. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39842044/ [54] Hosseini FA, Shaygan M, Shayegan M. "Effects of resilience training for mothers on maternal resilience and children's pain in pediatric burn units in a randomized controlled trial." Scientific reports 2025. PMID: 40382408. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40382408/ [55] Zhang C, Qin B, Zhang G, et al. "The Impact of Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy on Caregivers of Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 39478360. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39478360/ [56] Wahyuningtyas ES, Handayani E, Wijayatri R, et al. "An Observational Study of Knowledge of First Aid for Burns among Parents in Indonesia." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 37294898. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37294898/ [57] Nguyen A, Chikoti R, Bell D. "Pain, Distress, and Psychological Sequelae in Pediatric Burn Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions Across the Care Continuum." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2026. PMID: 41081740. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41081740/ [58] Kazemi-Sufi S, Bagheri A, Mazhari SA, et al. "Post-traumatic growth and its explanatory factors in burn patients: A systematic review." International wound journal 2024. PMID: 39401983. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39401983/ [59] Jawad AM, Kadhum M, Evans J, et al. "Recovery of functional independence following major burn: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38492981. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38492981/ [60] Al Hanna R, Cofré Lizama LE, Amatya B, et al. "Rehabilitation in adults with burn injury: an overview of systematic reviews." Disability and rehabilitation 2024. PMID: 38488113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38488113/ [61] Elsayed AGF, Mahmoud HMY, Eladl HM, et al. "Interactive versus passive virtual reality on upper limb pain, function, and range of motion in pediatric thermal burns, a randomized controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41775030. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41775030/ [62] Yas A, Rabeipoor S, Kazemzadeh J, et al. "Psychosocial needs of female self-immolation survivors: a systematic review and meta synthesis of qualitative studies." BMC women's health 2025. PMID: 41188855. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41188855/ [63] Atiaa AG, Abd E-Kader SM, Ellakwa DE. "Integrative physiotherapy in burn rehabilitation: Innovations in physical, psychological, and technological interventions - A narrative review." Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2025. PMID: 41316645. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41316645/ [64] Krbcová Moudrá V, Zajíček R, Bakalář B, et al. "Burn-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction: A Brief Review and Long-Term Consequences for Cardiologists in Clinical Practice." Heart, lung & circulation 2021. PMID: 34275754. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34275754/ [65] Rowe G, Allahham A, Edgar DW, et al. "Functional Brain Changes Following Burn Injury: A Narrative Review." Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2024. PMID: 38044625. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38044625/ [66] Cleary M, West S, Kornhaber R, et al. "Moving the lenses of trauma - Trauma-informed care in the burns care setting." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 32192867. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32192867/ [67] Stewart BT, Carrougher GJ, Curtis E, et al. "Mortality prognostication scores do not predict long-term, health-related quality of life after burn: A burn model system national database study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33092898. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33092898/ [68] Li R, Zheng Y, Fan X, et al. "Epidemiology and Predictors for Cervical Burn Scar Contractures: A Multicenter Cohort Study." The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2023. PMID: 37184463. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37184463/ [69] Heaslip V, Docherty S, Rhodes S, et al. "Patients' experiences of treatment and the scar management pathway during the Early Laser for Burn Scars (ELABS) trial: An embedded qualitative study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41297231. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41297231/ [70] Tirado-Esteban A, Seoane JL, Serracanta Domènech J, et al. "Sensory alteration patterns in burned patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31526634. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31526634/ [71] Atkins WC, Foster J, McKenna ZJ, et al. "Exercise and Heat Stress in Well-Healed Burn Survivors: Effects of Cooling Modalities on Thermal and Perceptual Responses." Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2025. PMID: 39283237. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39283237/