Natural and phytotherapeutic topicals for burns
Summary
- What it covers: Plant- and bee-derived topical agents for burns: honey, aloe vera, curcumin, propolis, sea buckthorn, and other herbal preparations and essential oils [1][18][19].
- Clinical bounds: Studied mostly in superficial and partial-thickness (second-degree) burns, often compared against silver sulfadiazine [2][3].
- Core principles: Honey is the most-studied agent and heals partial-thickness burns faster than conventional dressings, but trial quality is low and largely single-center [1][4].
- Watch for: Honey failed to prevent chondritis in deep auricular burns, and folk topical garlic causes chemical burns [5][6].
Key Points
- Recognize: Honey is the only natural topical with high-certainty evidence of faster partial-thickness burn healing than conventional dressings, yet that evidence rests on low-quality, mostly single-investigator trials [1][4][7]. Honey
- Recognize: Aloe vera data are mixed: several reviews favor it over silver sulfadiazine [8][3][9], but the Cochrane review found no benefit [37] and one model showed delayed healing [39]. Aloe vera
- Watch for: Honey did not prevent deep bacterial complications in auricular burns; mafenide acetate had significantly less chondritis, so honey is a poor choice for deep wounds [5]. Complications and harms
- Watch for: Topical folk garlic causes second-degree chemical burns; patients should be counseled against applying it to skin or mucosa [10][6][11]. Complications and harms
- Unresolved: Curcumin and propolis remain largely preclinical or single-trial; the human burn evidence is too thin to position them clinically [12][13]. Curcumin
- Unresolved: Whether any natural topical changes burn outcomes more than choice of a moist dressing is unsettled given the heterogeneity and bias in the literature [2][14][3]. Controversies and Evidence Gaps
- Special populations: For postburn pruritus, small trials report symptom relief with a curcumin nano-micelle, a beeswax-herbal oil cream, and a peppermint-menthol hydrogel [15][16][48]. Special Considerations
Overview¶
Patients ask about honey, aloe, and turmeric for their burns, and a large literature exists to answer them, but most of it is low quality. Natural products are attractive for their pharmacologic activity, and reviews catalogue many plant and bee products as promising agents for burn wound healing [18][19]. The clinical reality is that the depth and rigor of evidence drop sharply once you move past honey, and the trials that do exist concentrate in superficial and partial-thickness burns rather than the deep injuries that drive burn-center practice.
This page treats these agents as a class so that the comparison against the standard topical of the burn literature, silver sulfadiazine (SSD), can be made plainly. Honey carries the most data and the most-cited efficacy signal. Aloe vera is second in volume, with directly contradictory primary studies. Curcumin and propolis are mostly preclinical or single-trial. The remaining botanicals and essential oils are largely animal models and traditional-medicine reports. Two harm signals run through the literature: honey performs poorly on deep wounds, and folk topical remedies, garlic in particular, cause their own burns.
Pathophysiology and Mechanisms¶
The mechanistic rationale for honey is the best characterized. Laboratory studies and clinical trials describe honey as a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent [20], with effects ascribed to its acidity, hydrogen peroxide content, osmotic effect, nutritional and antioxidant contents, stimulation of immunity, and unidentified compounds [20]. As a wound dressing, honey provides a moist healing environment, rapidly clears infection, deodorizes, and reduces inflammation, edema, and exudation [21]. One systematic review framed the appeal directly: honey has the antibacterial effect of silver without silver's toxic effect on skin [22].
The other agents share overlapping mechanisms. Curcumin, the active component of turmeric, has antioxidant and antiapoptotic properties and is a selective phosphorylase kinase inhibitor with effects on injury-induced skin pathways [12][23]. Propolis is reported to aid wound closure, tissue regeneration, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesis [24]. Across herbal preparations, flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, and phenolic compounds are the active constituents credited with facilitating wound closure [18]. These mechanisms are real in the laboratory; the question is whether they translate to patient outcomes.
Management¶
Natural topicals are organized below by agent, strongest evidence first. Comparisons are reported as the trials and reviews framed them, against SSD or conventional dressings.
Honey¶
Honey is the most-studied natural burn topical and carries the strongest efficacy signal in the literature, though that signal must be read against its methodologic weakness. The 2015 Cochrane review of honey for wounds reported high-quality evidence from two trials (n=992) that honey dressings heal partial-thickness burns more quickly than conventional dressings (weighted mean difference -4.68 days, 95% CI -5.09 to -4.28) [1]. Against SSD specifically, the same review found only very-low-quality evidence (4 trials, n=332) that honey-treated burns heal faster (WMD -5.12 days, 95% CI -9.51 to -0.73), and high-quality evidence from 6 trials (n=462) of no difference in the overall risk of healing within 6 weeks (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02) [1]. The 2017 Cochrane antiseptics-for-burns review reached a parallel conclusion: high-certainty evidence that honey reduced mean time to healing versus non-antibacterial treatments (difference in means -5.3 days, 95% CI -6.30 to -4.34; 4 studies, 1156 participants), and moderate-certainty evidence that burns treated with honey are more likely to heal over time than those treated with topical antibiotics (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.52) [2].
Disease-specific systematic reviews echo the direction. A 2009 meta-analysis of 8 studies (624 subjects) found a pooled odds ratio for healing at 15 days of 6.1 (95% CI 3.7 to 9.9) favoring honey, with all secondary outcomes also favoring honey [4]. A 2017 review of randomized trials concluded that honey dressings promote better wound healing than SSD, favoring honey in healing time (MD -5.76 days, 95% CI -8.14 to -3.39) and in the proportion of infected wounds rendered sterile (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.58-2.88) [25]. A 2015 review of South Asian randomized trials found honey more efficacious than silver for healing time (pooled risk difference -20, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.11) [22]. An earlier systematic review reported a number needed to treat with honey for good wound healing compared with antiseptic of 2.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 9.7) [26].
The individual trials supplying this signal are consistent but small and concentrated. In a left-right comparison of superficial and partial-thickness burns, sites treated with honey re-epithelialized faster than sites treated with SSD (13.47 ± 4.06 versus 15.62 ± 4.40 days; P < 0.0001) [27]. Across a series of single-center randomized studies, honey-dressed wounds healed earlier than amniotic membrane (mean 9.4 versus 17.5 days) [28], than boiled potato peel (mean 10.4 versus 16.2 days) [29], and than polyurethane film (mean 10.8 versus 15.3 days) [30], and rendered 90-91% of wounds sterile within 7 days [31][29]. In a randomized clinical and histological comparison against SSD, honey-dressed wounds showed early subsidence of acute inflammation and better infection control while SSD-treated wounds showed a sustained inflammatory reaction even at epithelialization [32]. Tualang honey reduced wound size by 32% by day 6 in a rat model [33].
The boundary of honey's benefit is the deep wound. When compared with early excision and grafting, honey delays healing in partial- and full-thickness burns (WMD 13.6 days, 95% CI 10.02 to 17.18) [14], and a dedicated randomized trial found early tangential excision and grafting clearly superior to expectant honey dressing in moderate burns [7]. Honey is a dressing for shallow burns that will heal on their own, not a substitute for surgery in deep injury.
Aloe vera¶
Aloe vera is the second-most-studied agent, and its primary literature directly contradicts itself. Several reviews favor aloe. A 2007 systematic review found the summary healing time for aloe vera 8.79 days shorter than control (P=0.006), with cumulative evidence tending to support aloe for first- to second-degree burns [34]. A 2022 meta-analysis found a statistically significant mean difference in time to healing of 4.44 days favoring aloe (P=0.004) [8], and a 2024 meta-analysis of randomized trials found aloe reduced mean wound-healing time versus other topicals (MD -3.76 days, 95% CI -5.69 to -1.84) while finding no significant difference in pain reduction or wound-infection risk [3]. A randomized controlled study reported faster re-epithelialization with aloe than SSD (15.9 ± 2 versus 18.73 ± 2.65 days; P < 0.0001) [35], an animal study found aloe cream significantly increased re-epithelialization compared with SSD [36], and a clinical comparison found earlier healing and earlier pain relief with aloe than SSD [9].
The Cochrane review and individual experimental studies temper that picture. The 2012 Cochrane review found aloe vera mucilage did not increase burn healing compared with SSD (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.85), and in a trial of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention, aloe significantly delayed healing (mean difference 30 days, 95% CI 7.59 to 52.41) [37]. The animal data are themselves split: one animal study found aloe-treated wounds healed faster than control (mean 30 versus 50 days; P < 0.02) with bacterial counts reduced comparably to SSD [38], while another controlled animal study found that the tested aloe vera gel preparation hindered healing of a second-degree burn model compared with SSD [39]. A separate finding complicates the SSD comparison itself: SSD retarded wound healing, and adding aloe vera or nystatin reversed that retardation [40], meaning some of aloe's apparent advantage may reflect SSD's own healing penalty rather than an intrinsic aloe benefit.
Curcumin¶
Curcumin is mostly a preclinical and nanoformulation story, with one human burn trial in pruritus. In rats, oral curcumin before and after injury reduced the percentage of unburned skin interspaces progressing to full-thickness necrosis (30% versus 63% at day 1; P=0.003) [12]. Curcumin gel produced rapid healing of burns with little residual scarring in mechanistic work [23], and it is proposed as a dual analgesic and wound-healing agent [41]. Its clinical translation is limited by delivery barriers that nanoparticle encapsulation aims to overcome to enable extended topical delivery [42]: curcumin nanoparticles inhibited MRSA and Pseudomonas in vitro [42], and a curcumin nanoliposomal formulation improved burn wounds and infections in a rat burn model [43]. The one randomized human burn trial used adjunctive oral curcumin nano-micelle for refractory postburn pruritus rather than as a topical wound agent [15], discussed under Special Considerations.
Propolis¶
Propolis has one small comparative burn study and supportive review-level mechanism data. A naturopathic substance derived from bee products, propolis was praised for antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and cicatrization-enhancing properties [13]. In a preliminary comparison against SSD, propolis skin cream showed no significant difference in microbial colonization but consistently less inflammation and more rapid cicatrization, and the authors concluded propolis appears to have a beneficial effect on partial-thickness burn healing [13]. A 2024 review described propolis aiding wound closure, tissue regeneration, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesis [24]. The clinical evidence base is a single preliminary trial.
Other botanicals and essential oils¶
The remaining agents are largely animal models, traditional-medicine reports, and integrative reviews. A randomized triple-blind clinical trial found sea buckthorn cream healed second-degree burns faster than 1% SSD (P < 0.001) [44]; an animal study found a sea buckthorn and olive oil mixture produced faster wound contraction and more mature granulation than SSD [45]. Centella asiatica extracts facilitated healing in incision and burn wound animal models [46]. An integrative review concluded that among single herbal preparations, Allium sativum, Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, and Hippophae rhamnoides showed the best burn wound-healing activity [18]. A patent review of natural products for skin burns highlighted Aloe vera, Coptis chinensis, borneol, menthol, and propolis, predominantly from Traditional Chinese Medicine, and underscored standardization and regulatory hurdles as the central challenge [19]. Tea tree oil fared poorly on direct testing: Burnaid, a cream containing tea tree oil and triclosan, showed no activity against E. faecalis or P. aeruginosa, and the authors recommended it not be used on burn wounds [17].
Complications and harms¶
The natural-products literature carries two distinct harm signals. The first is honey's failure on deep wounds. In a comparison of topical honey and mafenide acetate for auricular burns, the deep complication of burn, chondritis, was significantly lower in the mafenide group than the honey group [5], and the authors concluded that, in contrast to honey's reported healing and antibiotic activity, it may fail to prevent deep bacterial complications such as chondritis [5]. This is the clinical basis for not using honey on deep or cartilage-bearing burns.
The second signal is self-inflicted chemical injury from folk topical remedies, most often garlic. Case reports describe a 3-month-old infant with a second-degree burn from topical garlic [10], an oral mucosal burn from crushed raw garlic [47], and a child with partial-thickness burns from a garlic-petroleum jelly plaster applied at a naturopathic physician's direction [6]. A systematic review of reported garlic-burn cases found garlic most often caused second-degree burns, with some cases producing necrotic tissue, and that patients should be advised against applying fresh garlic to skin and mucosa [11]. The authors of one case report noted that pediatricians practicing where naturopathic medicine is routine should be aware of the burn potential of plasters, poultices, and other natural remedies in children [6].
Special Considerations¶
Postburn pruritus¶
Postburn itch affects up to 87% of the burn population [16], and several small studies have tested natural topicals and adjuncts for it. A randomized controlled trial of adjunctive oral curcumin nano-micelle in refractory postburn pruritus found a significant between-group reduction in total pruritus intensity (adjusted mean difference -2.83; 95% CI -5.54 to -0.11; P=0.041), with a non-significant trend toward improved sleep and quality of life [15]. A randomized pilot found a beeswax and herbal oil cream reduced itch more frequently than aqueous cream (P=0.001), with later itch recurrence and lower antipruritic-medication use [16]. An exploratory study of a guar-gum hydrogel impregnated with peppermint oil, menthol, and methyl salicylate (Chongqing No. 1) found significant symptomatic relief for severe intractable pruritus from hypertrophic scars, with skin irritation the only observed adverse event (8%, resolving after removal) [48]. These are small, heterogeneous studies, but they describe a plausible niche where natural and plant-derived adjuncts are tested for symptom control rather than wound closure.
First aid¶
Natural agents have also been studied as first aid, with consistently negative results relative to water. A review of first aid treatments concluded the recommendation should be cold running tap water (2 to 15 °C), not ice or alternative plant therapies [49]. A controlled study of aloe vera, tea tree oil, and saliva as first aid for partial-thickness burns found that, although the alternative treatments lowered subdermal temperature during application, they did not reduce microflora or improve re-epithelialization, scar strength, scar depth, or cosmetic appearance, and could not be recommended for first aid of partial-thickness burns [50]. Cool running water remains first-line; plant therapies do not displace it.
Outcomes¶
The outcome most robustly described across this literature is shorter time to healing for honey-treated partial-thickness burns versus conventional dressings, supported by high-quality pooled evidence [1][2]. Against SSD, the honey advantage is smaller and rests on lower-quality evidence, with no difference in the overall proportion healed by 6 weeks [1]. Honey is also associated with a reduction in adverse events relative to SSD [1]. For aloe vera, pooled reviews report a healing-time advantage on the order of 3.8 to 8.8 days [34][3], but this is offset by Cochrane's null finding and by a primary study showing delayed healing [37][39]. No natural topical has been shown to reduce mortality, and none has displaced surgical management in deep burns; the demonstrated outcomes are intermediate measures of healing speed, infection clearance, and symptom relief in shallow injuries.
Controversies and Evidence Gaps¶
Does the honey signal survive its methodologic weakness?¶
Honey shows the most consistent efficacy signal of any natural topical, but the trials behind it are weak and concentrated. A 2009 meta-analysis explicitly noted that the included studies were of poor quality, each with a Jadad score of 1, that six of the studies were undertaken by the same investigator, and that these limitations restrict the clinical application of the findings [4]. The 2008 Cochrane update added that all included burns trials originated from a single center, which may affect replicability [51]. The 2015 Cochrane review concluded it is difficult to draw overall conclusions about honey for wounds given heterogeneous populations and comparators and mostly low-quality evidence [1]. The direction of effect is consistent across reviews; the confidence in it is not, and the single-center, single-investigator origin of the burns trials is the central unresolved threat to validity.
Aloe vera: real benefit or SSD penalty?¶
The aloe literature points in both directions. Reviews favoring aloe sit alongside the Cochrane null finding and a primary study in which the tested aloe preparation hindered healing [37][39]. A confound runs underneath the SSD comparisons: SSD itself retarded wound healing in one model, and adding aloe reversed that retardation [40]. Some of aloe's apparent edge over SSD may therefore reflect SSD's own healing penalty rather than an intrinsic aloe benefit. Product heterogeneity compounds the problem; different aloe preparations and outcome measures make it hard to draw a specific conclusion [34].
Thin evidence for everything past honey and aloe¶
Curcumin, propolis, sea buckthorn, Centella asiatica, and the broader herbal and essential-oil literature rest on preclinical models, single small trials, or integrative reviews [12][13][44][18]. One integrative review found only 3 human studies against 62 in vivo and in vitro studies for its plant of interest, underscoring the need for clinical trials [18]. Reviews repeatedly conclude that natural products have therapeutic potential while naming standardization and regulatory hurdles as the obstacles to clinical use [19]. The gap is not mechanism; it is randomized human burn data.
References¶
[1] Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande S, Walker N. "Honey as a topical treatment for wounds." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015. PMID: 25742878 ↩
[2] Norman G, et al. "Antiseptics for burns." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2017. PMID: 28700086 ↩
[3] Huang YN, Chen KC, Wang JH, Lin YK. "Effects of Aloe vera on Burn Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38605441 ↩
[4] Wijesinghe M, Weatherall M, Perrin K, Beasley R. "Honey in the treatment of burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy." The New Zealand medical journal 2009. PMID: 19648986 ↩
[5] Hashemi B, Bayat A, Kazemei T, Azarpira N. "Comparison between topical honey and mafenide acetate in treatment of auricular burn." American journal of otolaryngology 2011. PMID: 20015812 ↩
[6] Parish RA, McIntire S, Heimbach DM. "Garlic burns: a naturopathic remedy gone awry." Pediatric emergency care 1987. PMID: 3324067 ↩
[7] Subrahmanyam M. "Early tangential excision and skin grafting of moderate burns is superior to honey dressing: a prospective randomised trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1999. PMID: 10630854 ↩
[8] Sharma S, Alfonso AR, Gordon AJ, Kwong J, Lin LJ, Chiu ES. "Second-Degree Burns and Aloe Vera: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review." Advances in skin & wound care 2022. PMID: 36264753 ↩
[9] Shahzad MN, Ahmed N. "Effectiveness of Aloe Vera gel compared with 1% silver sulphadiazine cream as burn wound dressing in second degree burns." JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2013. PMID: 23894900 ↩
[10] Rafaat M, Leung AK. "Garlic burns." Pediatric dermatology 2000. PMID: 11123784 ↩
[11] Hitl M, Kladar N, Gavarić N, Srđenović Čonić B, Božin B. "Garlic burn injuries- a systematic review of reported cases." The American journal of emergency medicine 2021. PMID: 33571752 ↩
[12] Singer AJ, McClain SA, Romanov A, Rooney J, Zimmerman T. "Curcumin reduces burn progression in rats." Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2007. PMID: 18045885 ↩
[13] Gregory SR, Piccolo N, Piccolo MT, Piccolo MS, Heggers JP. "Comparison of propolis skin cream to silver sulfadiazine: a naturopathic alternative to antibiotics in treatment of minor burns." Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) 2002. PMID: 11890438 ↩
[14] Jull AB, Walker N, Deshpande S. "Honey as a topical treatment for wounds." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013. PMID: 23450557 ↩
[15] Alirezaei L, et al. "Adjunctive curcumin nano-micelles reduce overall pruritus intensity in refractory post-burn pruritus: A randomized controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 41197197 ↩
[16] Lewis PA, et al. "A randomized controlled pilot study comparing aqueous cream with a beeswax and herbal oil cream in the provision of relief from postburn pruritus." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22665131 ↩
[17] Faoagali J, George N, Leditschke JF. "Does tea tree oil have a place in the topical treatment of burns?." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1997. PMID: 9248647 ↩
[18] Bahramsoltani R, Farzaei MH, Rahimi R. "Medicinal plants and their natural components as future drugs for the treatment of burn wounds: an integrative review." Archives of dermatological research 2014. PMID: 24895176 ↩
[19] Nascimento Júnior JAC, et al. "Exploring trends in natural product-based treatments to skin burn: A comprehensive review." Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology 2025. PMID: 39951972 ↩
[20] Al-Waili N, Salom K, Al-Ghamdi AA. "Honey for wound healing, ulcers, and burns; data supporting its use in clinical practice." TheScientificWorldJournal 2011. PMID: 21479349 ↩
[21] Molan PC. "Potential of honey in the treatment of wounds and burns." American journal of clinical dermatology 2001. PMID: 11702616 ↩
[22] Lindberg T, Andersson O, Palm M, Fagerström C. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of dressings used for wound healing: the efficiency of honey compared to silver on burns." Contemporary nurse 2015. PMID: 27027667 ↩
[23] Heng MC. "Signaling pathways targeted by curcumin in acute and chronic injury: burns and photo-damaged skin." International journal of dermatology 2013. PMID: 23231506 ↩
[24] Manginstar CO, Tallei TE, Niode NJ, Salaki CL, Hessel SS. "Therapeutic potential of propolis in alleviating inflammatory response and promoting wound healing in skin burn." Phytotherapy research : PTR 2024. PMID: 38084816 ↩
[25] Aziz Z, Abdul Rasool Hassan B. "The effects of honey compared to silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burns: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 27576926 ↩
[26] Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. "Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing." BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2001. PMID: 11405898 ↩
[27] Malik KI, Malik MA, Aslam A. "Honey compared with silver sulphadiazine in the treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns." International wound journal 2010. PMID: 20649832 ↩
[28] Subrahmanyam M. "Honey-impregnated gauze versus amniotic membrane in the treatment of burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1994. PMID: 7945822 ↩
[29] Subrahmanyam M. "Honey dressing versus boiled potato peel in the treatment of burns: a prospective randomized study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1996. PMID: 8884013 ↩
[30] Subrahmanyam M. "Honey impregnated gauze versus polyurethane film (OpSite) in the treatment of burns--a prospective randomised study." British journal of plastic surgery 1993. PMID: 8330089 ↩
[31] Subrahmanyam M. "Topical application of honey in treatment of burns." The British journal of surgery 1991. PMID: 2032114 ↩
[32] Subrahmanyam M. "A prospective randomised clinical and histological study of superficial burn wound healing with honey and silver sulfadiazine." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1998. PMID: 9625243 ↩
[33] Khoo YT, Halim AS, Singh KK, Mohamad NA. "Wound contraction effects and antibacterial properties of Tualang honey on full-thickness burn wounds in rats in comparison to hydrofibre." BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2010. PMID: 20815896 ↩
[34] Maenthaisong R, Chaiyakunapruk N, Niruntraporn S, Kongkaew C. "The efficacy of aloe vera used for burn wound healing: a systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2007. PMID: 17499928 ↩
[35] Khorasani G, Hosseinimehr SJ, Azadbakht M, Zamani A, Mahdavi MR. "Aloe versus silver sulfadiazine creams for second-degree burns: a randomized controlled study." Surgery today 2009. PMID: 19562446 ↩
[36] Hosseinimehr SJ, Khorasani G, Azadbakht M, Zamani P, Ghasemi M, Ahmadi A. "Effect of aloe cream versus silver sulfadiazine for healing burn wounds in rats." Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC 2010. PMID: 20361881 ↩
[37] Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KB, Doust J. "Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012. PMID: 22336851 ↩
[38] Rodríguez-Bigas M, Cruz NI, Suárez A. "Comparative evaluation of aloe vera in the management of burn wounds in guinea pigs." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1988. PMID: 3340673 ↩
[39] Kaufman T, Kalderon N, Ullmann Y, Berger J. "Aloe vera gel hindered wound healing of experimental second-degree burns: a quantitative controlled study." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1988. PMID: 3360818 ↩
[40] Muller MJ, Hollyoak MA, Moaveni Z, Brown TL, Herndon DN, Heggers JP. "Retardation of wound healing by silver sulfadiazine is reversed by Aloe vera and nystatin." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2003. PMID: 14636760 ↩
[41] Cheppudira B, et al. "Curcumin: a novel therapeutic for burn pain and wound healing." Expert opinion on investigational drugs 2013. PMID: 23902423 ↩
[42] Krausz AE, et al. "Curcumin-encapsulated nanoparticles as innovative antimicrobial and wound healing agent." Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine 2015. PMID: 25240595 ↩
[43] Kianvash N, et al. "Evaluation of propylene glycol nanoliposomes containing curcumin on burn wound model in rat: biocompatibility, wound healing, and anti-bacterial effects." Drug delivery and translational research 2017. PMID: 28707264 ↩
[44] Abdullahzadeh M, Shafiee S. "To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second-degree burns: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial." Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society 2021. PMID: 33792111 ↩
[45] Edraki M, Akbarzadeh A, Hosseinzadeh M, Tanideh N, Salehi A, Koohi-Hosseinabadi O. "Healing effect of sea buckthorn, olive oil, and their mixture on full-thickness burn wounds." Advances in skin & wound care 2014. PMID: 24932952 ↩
[46] Somboonwong J, Kankaisre M, Tantisira B, Tantisira MH. "Wound healing activities of different extracts of Centella asiatica in incision and burn wound models: an experimental animal study." BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2012. PMID: 22817824 ↩
[47] Vargo RJ, Warner BM, Potluri A, Prasad JL. "Garlic burn of the oral mucosa: A case report and review of self-treatment chemical burns." Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 2017. PMID: 28390650 ↩
[48] Wu J, et al. "Effective symptomatic treatment for severe and intractable pruritus associated with severe burn-induced hypertrophic scars: A prospective, multicenter, controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2016. PMID: 27207739 ↩
[49] Cuttle L, Pearn J, McMillan JR, Kimble RM. "A review of first aid treatments for burn injuries." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2009. PMID: 19269746 ↩
[50] Cuttle L, et al. "The efficacy of Aloe vera, tea tree oil and saliva as first aid treatment for partial thickness burn injuries." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2008. PMID: 18603378 ↩
[51] Jull AB, Rodgers A, Walker N. "Honey as a topical treatment for wounds." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008. PMID: 18843679 ↩
Educational reference — not medical advice. Disclaimer