Burn·Wiki

Inhalation Injury Diagnosis and Severity Grading

150 refs · 43 min read

Summary

Summary — bedside~15 sec read
  • What it covers: Diagnosing inhalation injury and grading its severity across bronchoscopy, imaging, blood-gas and biomarker adjuncts, and the named scoring systems [1][2].
  • Clinical bounds: Burn and smoke-exposed patients from minor smoke exposure to lethal closed-space entrapment; injury is clinically silent for 48 to 72 hours [3][4].
  • Core principles: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the practical reference standard (sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.94 vs histology), but grading is subjective with no consensus objective system [5][6][7].
  • Watch for: A normal admission chest radiograph and clinical exam do not exclude significant inhalation injury [8][9].
Key Points
  • Recognize: Inhalation injury is a chemical tracheobronchitis that is clinically silent for 48 to 72 hours, so diagnosis cannot wait for respiratory deterioration [10][4]. Pathophysiology
  • Recognize: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the accepted reference standard, sensitive and highly specific against histology, identifying both anatomic level and severity of large-airway injury [5][11]. Assessment
  • Watch for: The admission chest radiograph is insensitive; significant lung damage can be present with a normal initial film, and classic exam signs grade poorly against bronchoscopy [8][9]. Assessment
  • Watch for: Higher bronchoscopic grade tracks a steep rise in ARDS and pneumonia, so a severe grade flags the patient who will need the most lung support [12][13]. Management
  • Unresolved: Bronchoscopic grade predicts ARDS and pneumonia consistently, but its association with mortality is contested across cohorts and weakened by poor inter-rater reliability [6][2]. Controversies and Evidence Gaps
  • Unresolved: No worldwide consensus grading standard exists, and the ABA concluded there are insufficient data to support a treatment standard for the diagnosis of inhalation injury [7][14]. Controversies and Evidence Gaps
  • Special populations: In children, routine flexible laryngoscopy adds little over clinical signs (29% sensitivity), so reserve it for those with clinical findings [15]. Special Considerations

Overview

Inhalation injury is the diagnosis you cannot afford to miss and cannot easily confirm. It is an acute insult of the respiratory tract from inhaled heat, toxic gases, chemical irritants, and the particulate matter of smoke; mechanistically it is a chemical tracheobronchitis [10][16]. The injury is present at the moment of exposure but stays clinically inapparent for the first 48 to 72 hours, and respiratory failure is typically preceded by only a 12 to 48 hour window of minor symptoms [4][17]. That latency is the central clinical problem: by the time the patient looks sick, the therapeutic window for anticipating the course has narrowed. The injury operates through three primary mechanisms, airway edema and obstruction, hypoxemic respiratory failure, and pneumonia, and is partitioned anatomically into supraglottic, subglottic, and systemic components [18][19].

Grading matters because inhalation injury is a major cause of burn morbidity and mortality and an independent predictor of death, yet it is notoriously difficult to quantify, historically reliant on a nonspecific clinical exam plus bronchoscopy [20][3]. A grade does real clinical work: it stratifies the risk of ARDS, pneumonia, and prolonged ventilation, and it informs triage and resuscitation planning [12][21]. The unresolved tension that runs through this page is that the field has no universally accepted, objective grading standard, the dominant bronchoscopic schemes are subjective with poor inter-rater reliability, and the link between grade and mortality is contested even as the link between grade and lung complications is robust [6][7].

Epidemiology

Inhalation injury is present in roughly one-third of major burn or burn-center patients, the figure cited most consistently across decades and still repeated in recent literature [22][23]. The largest pooled estimate sets a lower anchor: a meta-analysis of 54 studies and 408,157 patients calculated a pooled prevalence of 15.7% (95% CI 13.4 to 18.3%) [24]. The gap between one-third and one-sixth is itself a diagnostic signal, because documented prevalence varies significantly between centers and by classification method, reflecting the absence of a shared definition rather than true biological variation [25].

Risk rises with burn size, older age, and closed-space fires. Incidence climbs monotonically with burn extent: inhalation injury was observed in only 2.2% of burns under 20% TBSA but 14% of burns of 80 to 99% TBSA [26][27]. The epidemiologic mortality contribution is large and consistent. Inhalation injury independently raises the odds of in-hospital death, with a summarized odds ratio near 3.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 4.3); historically, 60 to 70% of burn-center fatalities are attributed to the pulmonary complications of inhalation injury [24][28]. Added to a cutaneous burn, inhalation injury raises TBSA-matched mortality by up to roughly 20% above the expectation from age and burn extent [29].

Pathophysiology

The lesion that diagnostic tests detect is destruction of the ciliated tracheobronchial epithelium, producing mucosal hyperemia, edema, erosion, ulceration, slough, and pseudomembranous tracheobronchitis, the visible substrate that every bronchoscopic grading scheme reads [30][31]. The small airway is the primary site of injury; obstruction from edema, bronchospasm, and fibrin and cellular casts drives progressive hypoxia, while subglottic injury increases bronchial blood flow, disables the mucociliary escalator, and produces V/Q mismatch and shunt [31][32].

Two features of the pathophysiology are load-bearing for diagnostic timing and workup. First, the injury may be present immediately but clinically inapparent for 48 to 72 hours, which is why diagnosis cannot wait for clinical deterioration [4][17]. Second, smoke inhalation carries systemic poisons the workup must address: it comprises direct thermal damage, carbon monoxide poisoning, and cyanide poisoning, with CO a primary cause of death and CO and cyanide acting synergistically [33][34]. Carboxyhemoglobin is a marker of injury severity that correlates with pulmonary shunt fraction, though, as the assessment section details, it does not track the histologic degree of lung injury [35][36]. Injury severity also correlates with the airway and systemic inflammatory load; plasma immune mediators increase with worse grade even after adjustment for age and TBSA, which is part of the argument for grading the injury rather than treating it as binary [37]. That argument is not universal: in severely burned children, an added inhalation injury did not augment the early systemic inflammatory response [38].

Classification

For a diagnosis and severity topic, the classification systems are the clinical core, and they fall into three families: bronchoscopic mucosal grades, composite inhalation-specific severity scores, and burn-severity indices that carry an inhalation component.

Bronchoscopic grading systems

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the modality on which grading rests; it establishes the anatomic level and severity of large-airway injury and distinguishes a supraglottic from an infraglottic component [11]. Bronchoscopic abnormalities are graded mild, moderate, or severe by mucosal congestion, edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, and ulceration, and severity tracks recovery time, with mild injury resolving in about one week and severe injury in about three weeks [39].

The dominant scheme is the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) bronchoscopic grading, grades 0 to 4: 0 no injury, 1 mild, 2 moderate, 3 severe, 4 massive [12][40]. Its origin is the landmark Endorf and Gamelli 2007 cohort, which classified patients into five groups (0 to 4) from initial bronchoscopy on AIS criteria; with groups well matched for TBSA, grades 2, 3, and 4 had significantly worse survival than grades 0 or 1 (P = .03) [41]. Independent validation by Mosier in 2012 showed the grade rose with carboxyhemoglobin and worsened oxygenation, and produced a steep ARDS gradient: ARDS incidence at 24 hours by grade was 0%, 22%, 57%, and 80% across grades 0 to 3 (P < .01) [12]. A mucosal-depth scheme (Chou 2004, grades 0 to 3) found acute lung injury rates of 3.8%, 4%, 33%, and 77% by deepening mucosal injury [42].

Several three-category schemes (none-mild, moderate, severe) map grade to mortality. Aung 2018 reported mortality of 2.3%, 7.4%, and 30.7%, with only the severe group independently associated with mortality (OR 20.4) and the moderate group associated with longer ventilation only [43]. A large 443-patient series reported mortality of 1.0%, 13.0%, and 36.8% across mild, moderate, and severe injury, with severity correlating with TBSA, laryngeal burn severity, and tracheotomy rate [44]. A complementary epithelial-injury scheme (first, second, third degree) grades by hyperemia and edema, then erosion and petechial hemorrhage, then necrosis and exfoliation, with ventilation duration of 2 days versus 14 days separating second- from third-degree injury [45].

The descriptive mucosal score of Ikonomidis 2012 was built specifically to standardize the diagnosis, grading ENT and tracheobronchial lesions as 1 (edema, hyperemia, hypersecretion), 2 (bullous mucosal detachment, erosion, exudates), and 3 (profound ulcers, necrosis); it provides a unified language and flags upper-airway involvement, and it found that burned vibrissae and a suspected history were insufficient diagnostic criteria [46]. The older Moylan anatomic classification stratifies by site (upper-airway, major-airway, parenchymal) [47]. A landmark comparison found virtual bronchoscopy gives severity scores similar to fiberoptic bronchoscopy and correlates with the P/F ratio, with fiberoptic bronchoscopy 80.3% specific and 77% sensitive versus virtual bronchoscopy 67.2% specific and 85.5% sensitive for a P/F ratio of 300 or below [48].

Inhalation-specific severity scores

Composite scores attempt what a single bronchoscopic grade cannot. The Inhalation Injury Severity Score (I-ISS) is the standout: in a head-to-head of three systems graded at bronchoscopy within 24 hours (AIS, I-ISS, and a mucosal score), inter-system agreement was strong (Krippendorff's alpha 0.85), but only I-ISS was independently associated with overall survival (score 3 vs 1 to 2: OR 13.16, 95% CI 1.65 to 105.07; P = .02), with the authors attributing the AIS and mucosal-score failure to injury progression after the initial assessment [23]. A 5-point pneumonia-risk scale assigns one point each for age over 60, TBSA over 20%, bronchoscope grade 3 to 4, initial P/F ratio of 300 or below, and initial carboxyhemoglobin over 10%, with a score of 2 or more flagging high pneumonia risk [49]. An earlier quantitative framework combined chest radiograph, P/F ratio, peak inspiratory pressure, and bronchoscopy [50].

Burn-severity indices with an inhalation component

The revised Baux score adds 17 points for inhalation injury to age plus TBSA; it is simple and accurate for burn mortality, with an AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97) overall, dropping to 0.81 in a high-Baux subgroup [51][52]. The Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) awards an extra point for inhalation injury and is a strong survival predictor [53]. In a head-to-head of indices in adults with 20% TBSA or more, burn formulae outperformed APACHE II, with the revised Baux best calibrated (AUROC 0.908) while ABSI and the original Baux discriminated well but overestimated mortality [54]. A modified ABSI was built specifically because no accepted inhalation severity grading exists, reaching a c-statistic of 0.94 [55]. The Prognostic Burn Index (burn index plus age, used especially in Japan) strongly predicts in-hospital mortality, with inhalation injury requiring mechanical ventilation an independent risk factor (OR 13.0) [56]. Downstream, the ARDS Berlin definition stratifies burn-ARDS severity and predicts mortality better than the older definition [57][58], although the Berlin criteria may not fully apply to early burn ARDS [59]. A chest radiograph grading scale (0 to 4+) has been proposed as a reporting standard [60].

Assessment

Diagnosis is multimodal, and the modalities sort cleanly by sensitivity. Bronchoscopy is the reference standard; functional and radionuclide tests catch early parenchymal injury the scope cannot see; chest radiograph and isolated clinical signs are the weakest and most misleading.

Bronchoscopy as the reference standard

Bronchoscopy is the accepted reference modality for diagnosing inhalation injury, named as such across decades [11][61]. The key performance datapoint: against histology as the gold standard, admission bronchoscopy in 130 burn patients was sensitive (0.79) and highly specific (0.94), and more reliable than the circumstances of injury, the clinical findings, or complementary tests [5][62]. The earliest landmark validation established that fiberoptic bronchoscopy is a simple, safe, and accurate method that identifies both the anatomic level and the severity of large-airway injury, with its only failure mode the immediate postburn period during hypovolemic shock [11]. Bronchoscopy-proven injury is one of the most strongly predictive single variables for ARDS onset and death, with an adjusted OR of 45.4 for severe bronchoscopic injury on multivariate analysis [63]. The grade also moderately correlates with early gas-exchange impairment, worsening with oxygenation indices at 24, 48, and 72 hours [12].

Bronchoscopy has two stated limits. It assesses only the proximal airway and does not comprehensively characterize parenchymal insult [64]. And it carries procedural risk: it is not recommended in acutely hypoxemic intubated patients on high FIO2, admission bronchoalveolar lavage is associated with increased pneumonia risk, and serial bronchoscopies performed to track progression may provide more risk than benefit [65][66]. Where injury is complicated by pneumonia, at least one bronchoscopy shortened mechanical ventilation (21 vs 28 days) and ICU stay [67].

Imaging adjuncts

The admission chest radiograph is insensitive, the central null finding of the assessment literature: significant lung damage can be present with a normal initial film, and in one series admission radiograph plus PaO2 plus auscultation were normal in 90% and could not predict respiratory failure or death [8][68]. It is vastly less sensitive than radionuclide imaging; only 17.6% of fire victims had an abnormal radiograph versus 82.4% abnormal on a DTPA scan [69]. Serial radiographs retain value for monitoring complications rather than initial diagnosis [70].

Chest CT adds value the radiograph cannot. An admission bronchial-wall-thickness cutoff over 3.0 mm predicted pneumonia with 79% sensitivity and 96% specificity, and also predicted ventilator and ICU days [71]. CT airway-narrowing cutoffs and admission CT complement bronchoscopy in predicting adverse outcome, with bronchoscopy plus a high CT score producing a 12.7-fold increase in the composite endpoint [72][64]. CT detects parenchymal lesions the radiograph misses, although the clinical benefit of CT severity staging remains debated [73].

Radionuclide imaging is the most sensitive early functional test. The xenon-133 V/Q scan is interpreted as normal when there is complete clearance of the radioactive gas by 150 seconds; it is often abnormal days before the chest radiograph, and combining it with bronchoscopy virtually eliminates false negatives by capturing both small- and large-airway injury [74][75]. Technetium-99m DTPA radioaerosol clearance flagged 82.4% of fire victims as abnormal, far outperforming radiograph and pulmonary function testing [69][76], though one report found DTPA clearance of limited clinical value despite animal promise [77]. A technetium-99m HMPAO lung scan offered a sensitive noninvasive option in patients with symptoms but a negative radiograph and pulmonary function test [78].

Blood gas, co-oximetry, and biomarkers

The P/F ratio is lower in inhalation injury on admission and correlated with mortality in adults where carboxyhemoglobin did not [79][3]. The A-a oxygen gradient is a foundational early metric predictive of pulmonary dysfunction [80]. Carboxyhemoglobin is an important null theme: it cannot predict the degree of lung injury, shows no significant correlation with histopathology, and is not significant in multivariate mortality models, even though it correlates with gas-exchange physiology and rises with AIS grade [81][82][36]. Diagnosis of CO exposure is best supported by carboxyhemoglobin over 10% combined with lactate, an enclosed-fire history, and altered consciousness [83][84]. Cyanide is difficult to assay rapidly, so elevated plasma lactate plus an enclosed-space fire and hypotension serve as practical biochemical surrogates for cyanide exposure; cyanide level does not track smoke-inhalation extent in fatal cases [85][86]. In burned children, the SpO2/FIO2 ratio is a usable noninvasive surrogate for the P/F ratio [87].

Bronchoalveolar lavage and cytology grade severity but carry caveats: pediatric BAL correlated poorly with radiographic pneumonia (PPV 21%, NPV 81%), tracheobronchial cytology scoring correlated with clinical and bronchoscopic scores, and BAL neutrophilia preceded ARDS [88][89][90]. Admission BAL is associated with increased pneumonia risk, arguing for judicious use [66]. Among biomarkers, the 20S proteasome is the best-performing single diagnostic marker, discriminating injury with sensitivity 0.88 and specificity 0.71 in burned patients but not predicting survival [91]. Plasma IL-1 receptor antagonist is independently associated with mortality after adjustment for age, TBSA, and grade (OR 3.12) [92][37]. Plasma sST2 in the first 24 hours predicted pneumonia (AUROC 0.929), and pulmonary suPAR is diagnostically elevated while systemic suPAR is prognostic [93][94]. Ubiquitin correlates inversely with injury grade and fluid requirements [95]. The recognized gap is the lack of validated diagnostic biomarkers [96].

Emerging tools and the limits of clinical signs

Point-of-care optical coherence tomography measures airway mucosal thickness to diagnose early ARDS, and a fine-tuned vision-transformer deep-learning model graded bronchoscopy images at 98% accuracy, framed as more accurate than human visual scoring [97][98]. A gradient-boosting machine-learning model differentiates mild from severe injury from day-1 admission data for settings where bronchoscopy is unavailable [99]. Against all of this, isolated clinical signs are unreliable: singed nasal hair, carbonaceous sputum, and facial burns showed poor discrimination against bronchoscopy (AUC below 0.7, kappa below 0.4), even with an enclosed-space mechanism [9]. Clinical manifestations may be delayed up to 72 hours and do not gauge 24-hour severity, although soot, dysphonia, and rhonchi retain some predictive value for complications [100][46]. The consensus practice is composite diagnosis combining history, physical exam, bronchoscopy, and laboratory findings, and flexible laryngoscopy can reduce unnecessary intubation in stable patients [14][101][102].

Management

This page is about how the diagnosis and grade drive decisions, not a ventilation or pharmacotherapy treatise; those are sibling topics. The grade does four things in clinical decision-making.

First, it stratifies care intensity by anticipating the multi-organ course. Higher bronchoscopic grade confers worse survival even when TBSA is well matched, and severe AIS grade independently predicts MODS, ARDS, pneumonia, and prolonged ventilation, so a severe grade is actionable for anticipating lung failure [41][21]. The dose-response ARDS gradient (0%, 22%, 57%, 80% by grade at 24 hours) and the three-level mortality and ventilation stratification let the team plan resource use before deterioration [12][43].

Second, endoscopic findings drive the intubation decision, in both directions. Bronchoscopy and laryngoscopy diagnose injury and directly enable the airway decision; in one algorithm fibroscopy was determinant in proceeding to intubation, and direct visual inspection also helps avoid unnecessary intubation [103][104]. Toilet bronchoscopy in isolated smoke-inhalation patients both clears mechanical obstruction and allows earlier ventilator liberation [105].

Third, the label alone is not an automatic intubation trigger. The diagnosis of smoke inhalation per se is not an indication for intubation, with intubation rates diverging sharply by associated burn (12% of non-burn vs 62% of burn patients), so the grade and context drive the airway decision, not the diagnostic label [106]. Sources warn against prophylactic intubation in all cases; in one confirmatory cohort, 57% of patients intubated on suspicion could not have inhalation injury confirmed [107][108][9].

Fourth, the diagnosis informs triage, transfer, and resuscitation. ABA criteria recommend transfer of inhalation-injury patients to a burn center, yet inappropriate triage occurred in more than three of four such patients within one burn network [109]. Diagnosed inhalation injury quantitatively raises resuscitation needs (5.76 vs 3.98 mL/kg/%TBSA), so the diagnosis changes the fluid plan, and diagnosis by bronchoscopy flags the sickest cohort with the greatest increases in mortality and resource use [110][101].

Complications

The complications scale with grade, which is the strongest argument for grading at all. Nosocomial pneumonia rises with grade and with associated burn: high-grade injury carries roughly double the hazard of nosocomial pneumonia (cause-specific HR 2.04), with pneumonia rates of 48% in high-grade versus 31% in low-grade versus 14% in no injury [13]. More severe injury (AIS 3 to 4 vs 1 to 2) is associated with higher pneumonia (risk difference 0.319) and ARDS (0.242) [2]. Among inhalation-injury patients, an associated burn of 20% TBSA or more roughly triples the pneumonia rate, and inhalation injury plus pneumonia doubles mortality (19% vs 9%) [111][112].

ARDS scales steeply with bronchoscopic grade (e.g., 3.8% at grade 0 to 77% at grade 3), and bronchoscopy-with-biopsy-confirmed injury predicts ARDS (52% vs 7%) [42][62]. ARDS prevalence in mechanically ventilated burn patients is about 33%, with mortality rising by Berlin-grade severity [97][58].

Procedure-associated harms are part of the diagnostic calculus. Admission bronchoalveolar lavage is associated with increased pneumonia risk, pulmonary lavage at bronchoscopy was independently associated with more ventilator days (OR 1.84) and higher sepsis (OR 7.2), and saline lavage causes profound transient hypoxemia [66][113]. Late airway sequelae tied to severity and intubation include tracheal stenosis (incidence about 5.5% among inhalation-injury patients), tracheomalacia, bronchiectasis, and bronchiolitis obliterans [114][115][116]. Dysphonia occurs in about 55% of inhalation-injury patients, rising to 87% with severe injury and resolving more poorly with severe grade [117][118]. Systemic complications correlated with the diagnosis include acute renal failure, critical-illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (OR 6.46), and sinusitis [119][120], although some adjusted analyses null the independent renal effect after controlling for TBSA and fluids [121].

Special Considerations

In children, airway assessment relies mainly on clinical judgment. Routine flexible laryngoscopy had only 29% sensitivity (95% specificity, NPV 91%) for clinical inhalation-injury findings, so it adds little over clinical signs and should be reserved for children with clinical findings [15]. Where injury is suspected, bronchoscopy is the diagnostic method used to establish it in large pediatric series, and the SpO2/FIO2 ratio is a noninvasive surrogate for ARDS diagnosis in burned children [122][123][87]. Pediatric inhalation injury is a stated independent mortality risk factor [124]. Scald-related supraglottic thermal injury is rare but real, with stridor the most common sign and bronchoscopy localizing it [125].

In pregnancy, fetal cord-blood carboxyhemoglobin can be high despite low maternal carboxyhemoglobin because fetal hemoglobin binds CO 2.5 to 3 times more strongly, which alters CO-poisoning interpretation and provides a physiological basis for early delivery [126][84]. COPD does not independently worsen short-term outcomes after fire-related inhalation injury, where systemic toxicity and burn severity dominate [127]. Assault and intentional-burn populations have higher documented incidence and worse outcomes [128].

Non-burn smoke inhalation is its own population: smoke inhalation without a cutaneous burn carries much lower mortality (under 10 to 11%) than with burns, so the associated burn, not inhalation alone, drives much of the risk [129][130]. A modified triage system using selective bronchoscopy, radiograph, and blood gas was useful in a smoke-inhalation mass-casualty incident [131]. Specific agents matter: anhydrous ammonia can cause end-stage lung disease, and plastic bronchitis from combined smoke inhalation and influenza A has been documented in children [132][133].

Outcomes

Inhalation injury is repeatedly cited as the third major mortality determinant after age and burn size, and as an independent predictor of mortality [134][135]. Pooled odds of in-hospital mortality are about 3.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 4.3), with an adjusted OR of 2.35 in one large cohort (31% vs 6% crude mortality) [24][136]. The effect is additive with pneumonia, with the combination raising mortality by about 60% [112].

Mortality scales with severity grade in a dose-response fashion: mild 1.0%, moderate 13.0%, severe 36.8% in one large series, and severe versus mild injury independently increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.14) in another [44][137]. Bronchoscopic findings correlate with mortality, with severe bronchoscopic injury an independent predictor (adjusted OR 45.4) [3][63].

The prognostic models put numbers on this. I-ISS was the only scoring system independently associated with overall survival (OR 13.16) [23]. The revised Baux score reached an AUROC of 0.96, and burn formulae incorporating inhalation injury outperformed APACHE II and qSOFA [51][54][52]. Age plus TBSA plus inhalation injury alone yields strong discrimination (AUC 0.892) [138]. Among biomarker and imaging signals, plasma IL-1RA is independently associated with mortality, bronchial wall thickness on admission CT reaches an AUROC of 0.956 for death, and plasma sST2 predicts pneumonia (AUROC 0.929) [37][139][93]. Long-term, bronchoscopic and histologic healing findings predict pulmonary functional outcome, and children surviving severe thermal injury may not regain normal lung function [140][141][142], although a single domestic-fire smoke inhalation does not necessarily imply long-term respiratory consequences [143].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps

No universally accepted grading standard exists. There are no worldwide consensus criteria for the diagnosis, severity grading, or prognosis of inhalation injury, and diagnostic criteria remain imprecise enough to prevent objective comparison of published data [7][46]. National surveys find variable criteria with no universal shared standard, and the burns community has not formed consensus on definitions, making diagnosis highly subjective with wide prevalence variation across units [83][25]. The American Burn Association concluded that there are insufficient data to support a treatment standard for the diagnosis of inhalation injury [14].

Bronchoscopic grading is subjective and unreliable. Grading uses manual judgment of visual mucosal features; inter-rater reliability for AIS image grading was clinically inadequate (kappa 0.30, intra-rater 0.45), and the evidence that injury severity affects clinical outcomes is inconsistent, possibly because of misclassification from this subjectivity [6]. The AIS grades 0 to 4 have not been validated in burn patients and need additional investigation [12][144].

Does grade predict mortality? This is the central debate. Grade reliably predicts ARDS and pneumonia, but multiple cohorts find bronchoscopic grade is not associated with mortality, and a 2025 meta-analysis found higher pneumonia and ARDS with severe grade but insufficient statistical evidence for a mortality association [145][136][2]. Inhalation injury's mortality association can lose significance after adjusting for disease severity and mechanical ventilation, so mechanical ventilation rather than inhalation injury per se emerges as the risk factor in some models [24][82]. Establishing an objective grading system associated with mortality is named as a meaningful research priority [145][55].

Individual modalities have hard limits. No satisfactory measure of inhalation injury has been developed; chest radiograph and pulmonary function testing have low sensitivity, carboxyhemoglobin does not correlate with histopathologic injury severity, and classic enclosed-space signs are unreliable even with an enclosed-space mechanism [69][81][9]. The DTPA scan and CT-based severity assessment remain of uncertain clinical value [77][61].

Biomarkers are immature. The lack of diagnostic biomarkers is a named deficiency, candidate markers are flagged as a research priority, and early gene expression does not differ significantly between inhalation-injury and burn-only patients, indicating an absence of specific diagnostic markers [96][146]. The overall evidence base is weak, mostly level 3 or below for lack of large-scale human studies [147].

Procedural confounding clouds the data. Many burn patients undergo unnecessary intubation over inhalation-injury concern, whether bronchoscopy itself exacerbates or merely flags injury is an open confounder, and the need for bronchoscopy and elective tracheostomy in suspected injury were among the most controversial issues in a burn-care survey [148][65][149]. Even the downstream Berlin ARDS criteria may not fully apply in burns, where early burn ARDS shows low mortality regardless of P/F ratio [59][150].

References

[1] Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, Boyer NL, Driscoll IR, Lundy JB, et al. "Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review." Critical care (London, England) 2015. PMID: 26507130 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26507130/ [2] Amarasekera NN, Jha A, Charles WN, Dutt A, Milton-Jones H, Kumana E, et al. "Evaluating the association between bronchoscopic severity of burns-related smoke inhalation injury and clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 41101183 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41101183/ [3] Hassan Z, Wong JK, Bush J, Bayat A, Dunn KW. "Assessing the severity of inhalation injuries in adults." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2010. PMID: 20006445 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20006445/ [4] Pruitt BA, Erickson DR, Morris A. "Progressive pulmonary insufficiency and other pulmonary complications of thermal injury." The Journal of trauma 1975. PMID: 1092877 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1092877/ [5] Masanes MJ, Legendre C, Lioret N, Maillard D, Saizy R, Lebeau B. "Fiberoptic bronchoscopy for the early diagnosis of subglottal inhalation injury: comparative value in the assessment of prognosis." The Journal of trauma 1994. PMID: 8295250 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8295250/ [6] Kumana ET, Charles WN, Milton-Jones H, Agbontaen K, Soussi S, Dunn K, et al. "Evaluating inter-and intra-rater reliability in the bronchoscopic grading of burn inhalation injury: The iBRONCH-BII study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40327969 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40327969/ [7] Enkhbaatar P, Pruitt BA, Suman O, Mlcak R, Wolf SE, Sakurai H, et al. "Pathophysiology, research challenges, and clinical management of smoke inhalation injury." Lancet (London, England) 2016. PMID: 27707500 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27707500/ [8] Wittram C, Kenny JB. "The admission chest radiograph after acute inhalation injury and burns." The British journal of radiology 1994. PMID: 8087478 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8087478/ [9] Ching JA, Shah JL, Doran CJ, Chen H, Payne WG, Smith DJ. "The evaluation of physical exam findings in patients assessed for suspected burn inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25423438 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25423438/ [10] Jurkovich GJ, Moylan JA. "Inhalation injury--a major burn complication." Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants) 1983. PMID: 10262978 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10262978/ [11] Hunt JL, Agee RN, Pruitt BA. "Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in acute inhalation injury." The Journal of trauma 1975. PMID: 1152086 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1152086/ [12] Mosier MJ, Pham TN, Park DR, Simmons J, Klein MB, Gibran NS. "Predictive value of bronchoscopy in assessing the severity of inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 21941194 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21941194/ [13] Coston TD, Gaskins D, Bailey A, Minus E, Arbabi S, West TE, et al. "Severity of Inhalation Injury and Risk of Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study." Chest 2024. PMID: 38964672 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38964672/ [14] Ogura H, Sumi Y, Matsushima A, Tohma Y, Inoue Y, Tasaki O, et al. "[Smoke inhalation injury: diagnosis and respiratory management]." Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 2005. PMID: 16869127 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16869127/ [15] Cahan LOS, Kotovich D, Hamo MB, Gross M, Cahan SS, Hashavya S. "Fiberoptic laryngoscopy findings in pediatric burn patients referred to the pediatric emergency department." The American journal of emergency medicine 2025. PMID: 39736249 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39736249/ [16] Iyun AO, Ademola SA, Olawoye O, Michael AI, Oluwatosin OM. "Comparative Review of Burns With Inhalation Injury in a Tertiary Hospital in a Developing Country." Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice 2016. PMID: 26779804 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26779804/ [17] Theissen JL, Prien T, Maguire J, Lübbesmeyer HL, Traber LD, Herndon DN, et al. "[Respiratory and hemodynamic sequelae of unilateral inhalation injury of the lung]." Der Anaesthesist 1989. PMID: 2511777 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2511777/ [18] Peters RA, Cancio JM, Glenn K, Cancio LC. "Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Patient with Severe Inhalation Injury: Multidisciplinary Burn Team Care." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38367208 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38367208/ [19] Giurgiu RA, Bordeanu-Diaconescu EM, Grosu-Bularda A, Frunza A, Grama S, Dumitru CŞ, et al. "Comprehensive review of clinical presentation, treatment, and prognostic factors of airway burns." Journal of medicine and life 2025. PMID: 40599137 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40599137/ [20] Wolter TP, Fuchs PC, Horvat N, Pallua N. "Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial? A retrospective study of 61 patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2004. PMID: 15145196 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15145196/ [21] Sutton T, Lenk I, Conrad P, Halerz M, Mosier M. "Severity of Inhalation Injury is Predictive of Alterations in Gas Exchange and Worsened Clinical Outcomes." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2017. PMID: 28570316 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28570316/ [22] Moylan JA, Chan CK. "Inhalation injury--an increasing problem." Annals of surgery 1978. PMID: 666374 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/666374/ [23] Flinn AN, Kemp Bohan PM, Rauschendorfer C, Le TD, Rizzo JA. "Inhalation Injury Severity Score on Admission Predicts Overall Survival in Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 37279511 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37279511/ [24] Galeiras R, Seoane-Quiroga L, Pértega-Díaz S. "Prevalence and prognostic impact of inhalation injury among burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis." The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2020. PMID: 31688831 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31688831/ [25] Tracy LM, Dyson K, Mercier LL, Cleland H, McInnes JA, Cameron PA, et al. "Variation in documented inhalation injury rates following burn injury in Australia and New Zealand." Injury 2020. PMID: 31806382 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31806382/ [26] Veeravagu A, Yoon BC, Jiang B, Carvalho CM, Rincon F, Maltenfort M, et al. "National trends in burn and inhalation injury in burn patients: results of analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 24918946 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24918946/ [27] Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Taerum TV, Moysa GL, Alton JD. "The role of inhalation injury in burn trauma. A Canadian experience." Annals of surgery 1990. PMID: 2256764 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2256764/ [28] Carrougher GJ. "Inhalation injury." AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing 1993. PMID: 8489883 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8489883/ [29] Pruitt BA, Cioffi WG, Shimazu T, Ikeuchi H, Mason AD. "Evaluation and management of patients with inhalation injury." The Journal of trauma 1990. PMID: 2254994 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2254994/ [30] Desai MH, Mlcak R, Richardson J, Nichols R, Herndon DN. "Reduction in mortality in pediatric patients with inhalation injury with aerosolized heparin/N-acetylcystine [correction of acetylcystine] therapy." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1998. PMID: 9622463 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9622463/ [31] Shimazu T, Ogura H, Sugimoto H. "[Clinical and pathophysiologic problems associated with smoke inhalation injury]." Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 1998. PMID: 9547747 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9547747/ [32] Foncerrada G, Culnan DM, Capek KD, González-Trejo S, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Woodson LC, et al. "Inhalation Injury in the Burned Patient." Annals of plastic surgery 2018. PMID: 29461292 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29461292/ [33] Antonio AC, Castro PS, Freire LO. "Smoke inhalation injury during enclosed-space fires: an update." Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia 2013. PMID: 23857686 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23857686/ [34] Eckstein M, Maniscalco PM. "Focus on smoke inhalation--the most common cause of acute cyanide poisoning." Prehospital and disaster medicine 2006. PMID: 16771012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16771012/ [35] Westphal M, Morita N, Enkhbaatar P, Murakami K, Traber L, Traber DL. "Carboxyhemoglobin formation following smoke inhalation injury in sheep is interrelated with pulmonary shunt fraction." Biochemical and biophysical research communications 2003. PMID: 14623337 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14623337/ [36] Lange M, Cox RA, Enkhbaatar P, Whorton EB, Nakano Y, Hamahata A, et al. "Predictive role of arterial carboxyhemoglobin concentrations in ovine burn and smoke inhalation-induced lung injury." Experimental lung research 2011. PMID: 21309735 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21309735/ [37] Davis CS, Janus SE, Mosier MJ, Carter SR, Gibbs JT, Ramirez L, et al. "Inhalation injury severity and systemic immune perturbations in burned adults." Annals of surgery 2013. PMID: 23160150 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23160150/ [38] Finnerty CC, Herndon DN, Jeschke MG. "Inhalation injury in severely burned children does not augment the systemic inflammatory response." Critical care (London, England) 2007. PMID: 17306027 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17306027/ [39] Tang XX. "[Assessment of fiberoptic bronchoscopic examination in inhalation injury--analysis of 32 cases]." Zhonghua zheng xing shao shang wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua zheng xing shao shang waikf [i.e. waike] zazhi = Chinese journal of plastic surgery and burns 1989. PMID: 2507102 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2507102/ [40] Albright JM, Davis CS, Bird MD, Ramirez L, Kim H, Burnham EL, et al. "The acute pulmonary inflammatory response to the graded severity of smoke inhalation injury." Critical care medicine 2012. PMID: 22067627 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22067627/ [41] Endorf FW, Gamelli RL. "Inhalation injury, pulmonary perturbations, and fluid resuscitation." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2007. PMID: 17211205 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17211205/ [42] Chou SH, Lin SD, Chuang HY, Cheng YJ, Kao EL, Huang MF. "Fiber-optic bronchoscopic classification of inhalation injury: prediction of acute lung injury." Surgical endoscopy 2004. PMID: 15164282 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15164282/ [43] Aung MT, Garner D, Pacquola M, Rosenblum S, McClure J, Cleland H, et al. "The use of a simple three-level bronchoscopic assessment of inhalation injury to predict in-hospital mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with burns." Anaesthesia and intensive care 2018. PMID: 29361258 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29361258/ [44] Ning F, Chang Y, Qiu Y, Rong Y, Du W, Cheng W, et al. "[Analysis of clinical characteristics of 443 patients with inhalation injury]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2014. PMID: 25572889 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25572889/ [45] Ligen L, Hongming Y, Feng L, Chuanan S, Daifeng H, Xiaoye T. "Morphologic changes and prognosis of the respiratory tract epithelium in inhalation injury and their relationship with clinical manifestations." Surgery 2012. PMID: 21899868 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21899868/ [46] Ikonomidis C, Lang F, Radu A, Berger MM. "Standardizing the diagnosis of inhalation injury using a descriptive score based on mucosal injury criteria." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2012. PMID: 22348802 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22348802/ [47] Whitelock-Jones L, Bass DH, Millar AJ, Rode H. "Inhalation burns in children." Pediatric surgery international 1999. PMID: 9914356 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9914356/ [48] Kwon HP, Zanders TB, Regn DD, Burkett SE, Ward JA, Nguyen R, et al. "Comparison of virtual bronchoscopy to fiber-optic bronchoscopy for assessment of inhalation injury severity." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 25112807 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25112807/ [49] Lin CC, Liem AA, Wu CK, Wu YF, Yang JY, Feng CH. "Severity score for predicting pneumonia in inhalation injury patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2012. PMID: 21963078 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21963078/ [50] Brown DL, Archer SB, Greenhalgh DG, Washam MA, James LE, Warden GD. "Inhalation injury severity scoring system: a quantitative method." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1996. PMID: 8951544 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8951544/ [51] Dokter J, Meijs J, Oen IM, van Baar ME, van der Vlies CH, Boxma H. "External validation of the revised Baux score for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury." The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2014. PMID: 24553558 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24553558/ [52] Prasad A, Thode HC, Singer AJ. "Predictive value of quick SOFA and revised Baux scores in burn patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31859098 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31859098/ [53] Lionelli GT, Pickus EJ, Beckum OK, Decoursey RL, Korentager RA. "A three decade analysis of factors affecting burn mortality in the elderly." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2005. PMID: 16269217 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16269217/ [54] Tsurumi A, Que YA, Yan S, Tompkins RG, Rahme LG, Ryan CM. "Do standard burn mortality formulae work on a population of severely burned children and adults?." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 25922299 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25922299/ [55] Yamamoto R, Shibusawa T, Aikawa N, Sasaki J. "Modified abbreviated burn severity index as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with inhalation injury: development and validation using independent cohorts." Surgery today 2021. PMID: 32691141 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32691141/ [56] Tagami T, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. "Validation of the prognostic burn index: a nationwide retrospective study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 26120088 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26120088/ [57] Belenkiy SM, Buel AR, Cannon JW, Sine CR, Aden JK, Henderson JL, et al. "Acute respiratory distress syndrome in wartime military burns: application of the Berlin criteria." The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2014. PMID: 24553555 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24553555/ [58] Sine CR, Belenkiy SM, Buel AR, Waters JA, Lundy JB, Henderson JL, et al. "Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Burn Patients: A Comparison of the Berlin and American-European Definitions." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2016. PMID: 27070223 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27070223/ [59] Sjoberg F, Elmasry M, Abdelrahman I, Nyberg G, T-Elserafi A, Ursing E, et al. "The impact and validity of the Berlin criteria on burn-induced ARDS: Examining mortality rates, and inhalation injury influences. A single center observational cohort study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 38777667 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38777667/ [60] Peitzman AB, Shires GT, Teixidor HS, Curreri PW, Shires GT. "Smoke inhalation injury: evaluation of radiographic manifestations and pulmonary dysfunction." The Journal of trauma 1989. PMID: 2671399 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2671399/ [61] Koljonen V, Maisniemi K, Virtanen K, Koivikko M. "Multi-detector computed tomography demonstrates smoke inhalation injury at early stage." Emergency radiology 2007. PMID: 17285330 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17285330/ [62] Masanès MJ, Legendre C, Lioret N, Saizy R, Lebeau B. "Using bronchoscopy and biopsy to diagnose early inhalation injury. Macroscopic and histologic findings." Chest 1995. PMID: 7750332 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7750332/ [63] You K, Yang HT, Kym D, Yoon J, HaejunYim, Cho YS, et al. "Inhalation injury in burn patients: establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 25406889 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25406889/ [64] Oh JS, Chung KK, Allen A, Batchinsky AI, Huzar T, King BT, et al. "Admission chest CT complements fiberoptic bronchoscopy in prediction of adverse outcomes in thermally injured patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22210063 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22210063/ [65] Smith MD, April MD, Schauer SG, Rizzo JA. "Repeat Bronchoscopies Are Poorly Predictive of Outcomes Following Inhalation Injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 38628143 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38628143/ [66] Murphy TJ, Krebs ED, Riffert DA, Mubang R, Nordness MF, Guidry C, et al. "Incidence of Pneumonia Following Bronchoscopy and Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 39485820 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39485820/ [67] Carr JA, Phillips BD, Bowling WM. "The utility of bronchoscopy after inhalation injury complicated by pneumonia in burn patients: results from the National Burn Repository." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19826269 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19826269/ [68] Blinn DL, Slater H, Goldfarb IW. "Inhalation injury with burns: a lethal combination." The Journal of emergency medicine 1988. PMID: 3221064 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3221064/ [69] Lin WY, Kao CH, Wang SJ. "Detection of acute inhalation injury in fire victims by means of technetium-99m DTPA radioaerosol inhalation lung scintigraphy." European journal of nuclear medicine 1997. PMID: 9021108 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9021108/ [70] George A, Gupta R, Bang RL, Ebrahim MK. "Radiological manifestation of pulmonary complications in deceased intensive care burn patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2003. PMID: 12543049 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12543049/ [71] Yamamura H, Kaga S, Kaneda K, Mizobata Y. "Chest computed tomography performed on admission helps predict the severity of smoke-inhalation injury." Critical care (London, England) 2013. PMID: 23706091 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23706091/ [72] Yamamura H, Morioka T, Hagawa N, Yamamoto T, Mizobata Y. "Computed tomographic assessment of airflow obstruction in smoke inhalation injury: Relationship with the development of pneumonia and injury severity." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2015. PMID: 26187056 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26187056/ [73] Reske A, Bak Z, Samuelsson A, Morales O, Seiwerts M, Sjöberg F. "Computed tomography--a possible aid in the diagnosis of smoke inhalation injury?." Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2005. PMID: 15715631 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15715631/ [74] Schall GL, McDonald HD, Carr LB, Capozzi A. "Xenon ventilation-perfusion lung scans. The early diagnosis of inhalation injury." JAMA 1978. PMID: 712935 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/712935/ [75] Agee RN, Long JM, Hunt JL, Petroff PA, Lull RJ, Mason AD, et al. "Use of 133xenon in early diagnosis of inhalation injury." The Journal of trauma 1976. PMID: 1255837 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1255837/ [76] Sundram FX, Lee ST. "Radionuclide lung scanning in the management of respiratory burns." Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 1992. PMID: 1292391 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1292391/ [77] Clark WR, Grossman ZD, Ritter-Hrncirik C, Warner F. "Clearance of aerosolized 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentacetate before and after smoke inhalation." Chest 1988. PMID: 3289836 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3289836/ [78] Shiau YC, Liu FY, Tsai JJ, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Kao A. "Usefulness of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime lung scan to detect inhalation lung injury of patients with pulmonary symptoms/signs but negative chest radiograph and pulmonary function test findings after a fire accident--a preliminary report." Annals of nuclear medicine 2003. PMID: 14575375 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14575375/ [79] Przkora R, Fram RY, Herndon DN, Suman OE, Mlcak RP. "Influence of inhalation injury on energy expenditure in severely burned children." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2014. PMID: 24893760 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24893760/ [80] Luce EA, Su CT, Hoopes JE. "Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in the burn patient." The Journal of trauma 1976. PMID: 768513 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/768513/ [81] Lange M, Cox RA, Traber DL, Hamahata A, Nakano Y, Traber LD, et al. "No correlation between initial arterial carboxyhemoglobin level and degree of lung injury following ovine burn and smoke inhalation." Experimental lung research 2014. PMID: 24354493 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24354493/ [82] Kim Y, Kym D, Hur J, Yoon J, Yim H, Cho YS, et al. "Does inhalation injury predict mortality in burns patients or require redefinition?." PloS one 2017. PMID: 28953914 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28953914/ [83] Rajaratnam G, Baldwin AJ. "'To BAL or not to BAL, that is the question': Variations in smoke inhalation injury guidelines from burn units and centres in England, Scotland and Wales." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2024. PMID: 39353794 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39353794/ [84] Culnan DM, Craft-Coffman B, Bitz GH, Capek KD, Tu Y, Lineaweaver WC, et al. "Carbon Monoxide and Cyanide Poisoning in the Burned Pregnant Patient: An Indication for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy." Annals of plastic surgery 2018. PMID: 29461288 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29461288/ [85] Anseeuw K, Delvau N, Burillo-Putze G, De Iaco F, Geldner G, Holmström P, et al. "Cyanide poisoning by fire smoke inhalation: a European expert consensus." European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2013. PMID: 22828651 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22828651/ [86] Gill JR, Goldfeder LB, Stajic M. "The happy land homicides: 87 deaths due to smoke inhalation." Journal of forensic sciences 2003. PMID: 12570219 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12570219/ [87] Cambiaso-Daniel J, Voigt CD, Rivas E, Hundeshagen G, Nunez-Lopez O, Kamolz LP, et al. "Correlation Between PaO2/FIO2 and Peripheral Capillary Oxygenation/FIO2 in Burned Children With Smoke Inhalation Injury." Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies 2017. PMID: 28723881 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28723881/ [88] Ramzy PI, Jeschke MG, Wolf SE, Swischuk L, Heggers JP, Herndon DN. "Correlation of bronchoalveolar lavage with radiographic evidence of pneumonia in thermally injured children." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 2003. PMID: 14610423 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14610423/ [89] Khoo AK, Lee ST, Poh WT. "Tracheobronchial cytology in inhalation injury." The Journal of trauma 1997. PMID: 9003262 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9003262/ [90] Barth J, Möllmann HW, Mathey H, Müller FE, Müller KM. "[Prognostic significance of macroscopic and microscopic findings in acute inhalation damage in the most severely burned patients]." Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin 1990. PMID: 2393078 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2393078/ [91] Majetschak M, Zedler S, Romero J, Albright JM, Kraft R, Kovacs EJ, et al. "Circulating proteasomes after burn injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2010. PMID: 20182370 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20182370/ [92] Mandrup-Poulsen T, Wogensen LD, Jensen M, Svensson P, Nilsson P, Emdal T, et al. "Circulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist concentrations are increased in adult patients with thermal injury." Critical care medicine 1995. PMID: 8001382 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8001382/ [93] Ruiz-Castilla M, Dos Santos B, Vizcaíno C, Baena J, Guilabert P, Marin-Corral J, et al. "Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 predicts pneumonia in patients with inhalation injury: Results of a pilot study." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2021. PMID: 33143991 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33143991/ [94] Backes Y, van der Sluijs KF, Tuip de Boer AM, Hofstra JJ, Vlaar AP, Determann RM, et al. "Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor levels in patients with burn injuries and inhalation trauma requiring mechanical ventilation: an observational cohort study." Critical care (London, England) 2011. PMID: 22085408 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22085408/ [95] Baker TA, Davis CS, Bach HH, Romero J, Burnham EL, Kovacs EJ, et al. "Ubiquitin and stromal cell-derived factor-1α in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after burn and inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22105097 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22105097/ [96] Dyamenahalli K, Garg G, Shupp JW, Kuprys PV, Choudhry MA, Kovacs EJ. "Inhalation Injury: Unmet Clinical Needs and Future Research." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31214710 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31214710/ [97] Choi JH, Chou LD, Roberts TR, Beely BM, Wendorff DS, Espinoza MD, et al. "Point-of-care endoscopic optical coherence tomography detects changes in mucosal thickness in ARDS due to smoke inhalation and burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30482414 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30482414/ [98] Zhang K, Singh S. "Deep learning framework for bronchoscopic diagnosis of burn inhalation injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2026. PMID: 41297238 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41297238/ [99] Yang SY, Huang CJ, Yen CI, Kao YC, Hsiao YC, Yang JY, et al. "Machine learning approach for predicting inhalation injury in patients with burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2023. PMID: 37055284 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37055284/ [100] Hantson P, Butera R, Clemessy JL, Michel A, Baud FJ. "Early complications and value of initial clinical and paraclinical observations in victims of smoke inhalation without burns." Chest 1997. PMID: 9118707 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9118707/ [101] Ching JA, Ching YH, Shivers SC, Karlnoski RA, Payne WG, Smith DJ. "An Analysis of Inhalation Injury Diagnostic Methods and Patient Outcomes." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2016. PMID: 26594867 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26594867/ [102] Moshrefi S, Sheckter CC, Shepard K, Pereira C, Davis DJ, Karanas Y, et al. "Preventing Unnecessary Intubations: A 5-Year Regional Burn Center Experience Using Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy for Airway Evaluation in Patients With Suspected Inhalation or Airway Injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31222272 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31222272/ [103] Osguthorpe JD. "Head and neck burns. Evaluation and current management." Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery 1991. PMID: 1910727 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1910727/ [104] Gigengack RK, Cleffken BI, Loer SA. "Advances in airway management and mechanical ventilation in inhalation injury." Current opinion in anaesthesiology 2020. PMID: 33060384 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33060384/ [105] Cha SI, Kim CH, Lee JH, Park JY, Jung TH, Choi WI, et al. "Isolated smoke inhalation injuries: acute respiratory dysfunction, clinical outcomes, and short-term evolution of pulmonary functions with the effects of steroids." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2007. PMID: 17169496 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17169496/ [106] Clark WR. "Smoke inhalation: diagnosis and treatment." World journal of surgery 1992. PMID: 1290262 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1290262/ [107] Goh CT, Jacobe S. "Ventilation strategies in paediatric inhalation injury." Paediatric respiratory reviews 2016. PMID: 26628193 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26628193/ [108] Mackie DP, van Dehn F, Knape P, Breederveld RS, Boer C. "Increase in early mechanical ventilation of burn patients: an effect of current emergency trauma management?." The Journal of trauma 2011. PMID: 21610350 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21610350/ [109] Davis JS, Pandya RK, Pizano LR, Namias N, Dearwater S, Schulman CI. "Examining triage patterns of inhalation injury and toxic epidermal necrolysis-Stevens Johnson syndrome." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2013. PMID: 23966120 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23966120/ [110] Navar PD, Saffle JR, Warden GD. "Effect of inhalation injury on fluid resuscitation requirements after thermal injury." American journal of surgery 1985. PMID: 4073365 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4073365/ [111] Edelman DA, Khan N, Kempf K, White MT. "Pneumonia after inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2007. PMID: 17351439 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17351439/ [112] Shirani KZ, Pruitt BA, Mason AD. "The influence of inhalation injury and pneumonia on burn mortality." Annals of surgery 1987. PMID: 3800465 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3800465/ [113] Bull A, Galet C, Jones SW, Kurjatko A. "Dilution Is Not Always the Solution: A Retrospective Study of Pulmonary Lavage in Inhalation Injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40336201 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40336201/ [114] Almeida MA. "[Inhalation lesions in the burn patient]." Acta medica portuguesa 1998. PMID: 9567414 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9567414/ [115] Yang JY, Yang WG, Chang LY, Chuang SS. "Symptomatic tracheal stenosis in burns." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1999. PMID: 10090389 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10090389/ [116] Tasaka S, Kanazawa M, Mori M, Fujishima S, Ishizaka A, Yamasawa F, et al. "Long-term course of bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis obliterans as late complication of smoke inhalation." Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases 1995. PMID: 7716354 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7716354/ [117] Clayton NA, Hall J, Ward EC, Kol MR, Maitz PK. "Clinical profile and recovery pattern of dysphonia following inhalation injury: A 10-year review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 39721235 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39721235/ [118] Qing Y, Cen Y, Liu XX, Xu XW, Wang HS. "[Analysis of extubation time and late complications after early tracheotomy in patients with inhalation injury]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2011. PMID: 21651848 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21651848/ [119] Holm C, Hörbrand F, von Donnersmarck GH, Mühlbauer W. "Acute renal failure in severely burned patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1999. PMID: 10208394 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10208394/ [120] Graves KK, Faraklas I, Cochran A. "Identification of risk factors associated with critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency in burn patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2012. PMID: 22210064 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22210064/ [121] Kumar AB, Andrews W, Shi Y, Shotwell MS, Dennis S, Wanderer J, et al. "Fluid resuscitation mediates the association between inhalational burn injury and acute kidney injury in the major burn population." Journal of critical care 2017. PMID: 27863270 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27863270/ [122] Sousse LE, Herndon DN, Andersen CR, Ali A, Benjamin NC, Granchi T, et al. "High tidal volume decreases adult respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, and ventilator days compared with low tidal volume in pediatric burned patients with inhalation injury." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2015. PMID: 25724604 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25724604/ [123] Palmieri TL, Warner P, Mlcak RP, Sheridan R, Kagan RJ, Herndon DN, et al. "Inhalation injury in children: a 10 year experience at Shriners Hospitals for Children." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2009. PMID: 19060756 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19060756/ [124] Sheridan RL, Schnitzer JJ. "Management of the high-risk pediatric burn patient." Journal of pediatric surgery 2001. PMID: 11479883 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11479883/ [125] Hudson DA, Jones L, Rode H. "Respiratory distress secondary to scalds in children." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1994. PMID: 7999273 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7999273/ [126] Ullmann Y, Blumenfeld Z, Hakim M, Mahoul I, Sujov P, Peled IJ. "Urgent delivery, the treatment of choice in term pregnant women with extended burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1997. PMID: 9177885 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9177885/ [127] Fedor CJ, Arellano JA, Liu HY, Kaulakis MG, Corcos AC, Siedsma MP, et al. "Clearing the Air: Impact of COPD on Inhalation Injury Outcomes." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2025. PMID: 40483684 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40483684/ [128] Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan HH, Chow CM. "Assault by burning--a reappraisal." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2001. PMID: 11451600 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11451600/ [129] Mlcak RP, Suman OE, Herndon DN. "Respiratory management of inhalation injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2007. PMID: 17223484 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17223484/ [130] Edelman DA, White MT, Tyburski JG, Wilson RF. "Factors affecting prognosis of inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2006. PMID: 17091081 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17091081/ [131] Goh SH, Tiah L, Lim HC, Ng EK. "Disaster preparedness: Experience from a smoke inhalation mass casualty incident." European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2006. PMID: 17091053 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17091053/ [132] Ortiz-Pujols S, Jones SW, Short KA, Morrell MR, Bermudez CA, Tilley SL, et al. "Management and sequelae of a 41-year-old jehovah's witness with severe anhydrous ammonia inhalation injury." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2014. PMID: 24784905 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24784905/ [133] Jin F, Wu L, Tao X, Wu H, Wang Y. "Pediatric plastic bronchitis associated with smoke inhalation and influenza A: case report and literature review." BMC pulmonary medicine 2024. PMID: 39160495 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39160495/ [134] Ronkar NC, Galet C, Richey K, Foster K, Wibbenmeyer L. "Predictors and Impact of Pneumonia on Adverse Outcomes in Inhalation Injury Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 37352120 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37352120/ [135] Nygaard RM, Endorf FW. "Hyperbaric Oxygen and Mortality in Burns With Inhalation Injury: A Study of the National Burn Repository." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 34105724 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34105724/ [136] Witt CE, Stewart BT, Rivara FP, Mandell SP, Gibran NS, Pham TN, et al. "Inpatient and Postdischarge Outcomes Following Inhalation Injury Among Critically Injured Burn Patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2021. PMID: 33560337 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33560337/ [137] Charles WN, Collins D, Mandalia S, Matwala K, Dutt A, Tatlock J, et al. "Impact of inhalation injury on outcomes in critically ill burns patients: 12-year experience at a regional burns centre." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2022. PMID: 34924231 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34924231/ [138] Ray JJ, Meizoso JP, Allen CJ, Teisch LF, Yang EY, Foong HY, et al. "Admission Hyperglycemia Predicts Infectious Complications After Burns." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2017. PMID: 27355659 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27355659/ [139] Wang X, Zhang XN, Wu ML, Jia LC, Xie LN, Meng Y, et al. "[Dynamic variation trend and prognostic value of bronchial wall thickness in severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2018. PMID: 29690738 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29690738/ [140] Arakawa A, Fukamizu H, Hashizume I, Kasamatsu N, Nagayoshi M, Shinozuka N, et al. "Macroscopic and histological findings in the healing process of inhalation injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2007. PMID: 17521820 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17521820/ [141] Mlcak R, Desai MH, Robinson E, Nichols R, Herndon DN. "Lung function following thermal injury in children--an 8-year follow up." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1998. PMID: 9677023 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9677023/ [142] Won YH, Cho YS, Joo SY, Seo CH. "Respiratory Characteristics in Patients With Major Burn Injury and Smoke Inhalation." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2022. PMID: 34142710 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34142710/ [143] Bourbeau J, Lacasse Y, Rouleau MY, Boucher S. "Combined smoke inhalation and body surface burns injury does not necessarily imply long-term respiratory health consequences." The European respiratory journal 1996. PMID: 8836661 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8836661/ [144] Spano S, Hanna S, Li Z, Wood D, Cartotto R. "Does Bronchoscopic Evaluation of Inhalation Injury Severity Predict Outcome?." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2016. PMID: 26594859 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26594859/ [145] Suresh M, Pruskowski KA, Rizzo JA, Gurney JM, Cancio LC. "Characteristics and outcomes of patients with inhalation injury treated at a military burn center during U.S. combat operations." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2020. PMID: 31493953 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31493953/ [146] Jiang H, Dou Z, Chen G, Zhang G, Du W. "Insignificant Difference in Early Post-injury Gene Expression Between Patients with Burns Only and Those with Inhalation Injury: A Bioinformatics Analysis." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 37306053 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37306053/ [147] Deutsch CJ, Tan A, Smailes S, Dziewulski P. "The diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: An evidence based approach." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29398078 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29398078/ [148] Perkins L, Horita H, Adams L, Marshall W, Lee J, Doucet J, et al. "Inhalation Injury: Which Providers Can Assess the Need for Intubation?." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 37208913 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37208913/ [149] Ziegler B, Hirche C, Horter J, Kiefer J, Grützner PA, Kremer T, et al. "In view of standardization Part 2: Management of challenges in the initial treatment of burn patients in Burn Centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 27665246 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27665246/ [150] Dries DJ, Endorf FW. "Inhalation injury: epidemiology, pathology, treatment strategies." Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2013. PMID: 23597126 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23597126/