Tissue expansion in burn reconstruction

Overview

Tissue expansion answers a problem that defines postburn reconstruction: the functional or aesthetic burn deformity is, at root, a local skin shortage, and the ideal solution is replacement with new normal tissue ^[55]. An inflatable silicone expander placed under intact skin adjacent to a scar generates exactly that, growing tissue in situ that matches the recipient site in color, texture, sensation, and hair-bearing characteristics ^[22]. This donor-site economy is the central rationale. Where free tissue transfer brings bulk and is poorly matched to thin, pliable skin ^[59], and where a graft is characterized by scarring and retraction ^[67], an expanded local flap brings skin that looks and behaves like the skin it replaces, with the donor site often closed primarily ^[3][22].

The reconstructive surgeon meets these problems months to years after the acute injury. Definitive correction of burn scarring is generally delayed for a year or more after the scar heals, because unsightly scars mature over time and many soften with pressure and splinting before any operation is needed ^[1]. The basic concerns in burn reconstruction are function, comfort, and appearance, and reconstruction proceeds in a stepwise hierarchy from simplest to most complex, restoring active function first, then passive function, and finally aesthetics ^[1][2]. Tissue expansion sits well up that ladder: it is not a first move, but for the right deformity in the right location it is a workhorse.

The technique earned its strongest role in two settings. In postburn alopecia, skin expansion of the hair-bearing scalp has become the standard management, providing a large hair-bearing area and significantly improving aesthetic appearance, albeit with a relatively high complication rate ^[2]. In the face and neck, where skin is thin and pliable and color match is unforgiving, expansion of adjacent cheek and neck skin allows like-with-like reconstruction without creating significant donor-site morbidity ^[21][62]. The trade is that expansion is slow and staged, the deformity is visible during the inflation period, and complication rates run high across all sites ^[2][35]. The literature is large but largely uncontrolled, and the central evidence gap is the absence of high-quality comparative data on when to choose expansion over the alternatives ^[53].

Pathophysiology

Expansion works because mechanical strain on skin drives biological growth, not merely passive stretch ^[56]. The strain signal is transduced through cascades implicating growth factors, the cytoskeleton, and the protein kinase family, and the result is genuine new skin production rather than recruitment of pre-existing laxity alone ^[56]. With rectangular expanders, the additional skin is gained through the height of the expanded dome, which informs expander selection and the geometry of the planned advancement ^[63].

A fibrous capsule forms around every expander, and its biology matters for the eventual flap. The capsule is a fibrous membrane whose thickness, stiffness, collagen content, and type I/III collagen ratio depend on which layer it forms in and how long the expander persists in vivo ^[33]. After neck expander removal the capsule can persist for more than 24 months, with a stiffness that remains greater than normal skin and that limits neck mobility; some patients develop cord-like capsular contracture and a cervical pulling sensation attributed to fusion of the deep capsule with the platysma ^[33]. The same capsule biology can be turned to advantage. Skin expansion in a donor region modifies the morphology of the transferred flap through capsule formation and fatty-tissue atrophy, thinning the flap toward the thin, pliable character that neck reconstruction demands ^[59].

A distinct mechanism underlies prefabrication, which combines expansion with neovascularization. Tissue neovascularized by implanting a vascular pedicle can be transferred as a prefabricated flap based on the blood flow through the implanted pedicle ^[4]. Preexpansion and prefabrication of a super-thin skin perforator flap can improve the anastomoses between neighboring subdermal vascular plexuses and extend the supplying area of those vessels into the flap, enlarging the safe territory that can be moved in one piece ^[14].

Classification

Postburn deformities have been organized into classification schemes to guide technique selection, and tissue expansion appears across most of them. For burn alopecia, scalp defects are classified as type I uniform, type II segmental, type III patchy, and type IV total alopecia, a scheme intended to influence operative planning and establish guidelines for correction ^[47]. For lateral cervical contractures, the scar deficiency is divided anatomically into edge and medial types, both arising from a trapezoid-form surface deficiency in scar-sheet length ^[61].

Algorithmic approaches operationalize these schemes. For extremity contractures, an algorithm structures management around adequate contracture release as the first component ^[27]. For facial resurfacing with healthy cervical skin, the lateral facial areas and neck contain essentially the same type of skin, so expansion of adjacent cervical tissue allows optimal aesthetic reconstruction by expanding either the lower face or the neck interchangeably without major donor-site morbidity ^[21]. Across these systems, expanded full-thickness skin grafts and expanded local flaps are the two essential expansion-based techniques, and indications are individualized to the aesthetic unit involved ^[2][57].

Assessment

Selection of an expansion-based reconstruction starts with the deformity, the available donor skin, and the patient's own priorities. Tissue expansion is indicated when there is inadequate adjacent tissue for primary closure or simple local-flap repair, which is why the technique recurs in scalp, facial, and cervical reconstruction where local laxity is exhausted ^[43]. The surgeon assesses contracture morphology and functional deficit before planning, and in cervical contracture the trapezoid geometry of the scar sheet drives both technique choice and the volume of expansion required ^[61][66].

Donor-site reserve is the second decision and is frequently the limiting factor. In extensive burns the regional donor areas adjacent to the contracture are themselves scarred, narrowing the options to free pre-expanded flaps or distant prefabricated tissue ^[17][58]. Patient-driven priorities shape the third decision. In a comparison of patients and surgeons, patients showed a strong reluctance to undergo further reconstruction, and although surgeons concurred on functional issues they diverged on aesthetic reconstruction, which led the authors to characterize secondary burn reconstruction as necessarily a patient-driven service ^[28]. Patient-reported outcome data reinforce that the burden of the staged process is real: among burn survivors, 27.4% underwent one or more reconstructive operations within 24 months of injury, and the likelihood of surgery rose with hand and perineal involvement and with range-of-motion limitation at discharge ^[29].

Management

Expander placement and staged inflation

The technique is fundamentally a staged procedure requiring two or three operations ^[3]. In the first operation the expander is placed adjacent to the scar; in a representative face-and-neck series it was inserted on the fascia of the pectoralis major muscle and inflated with approximately 1,000 cc of saline over a two-month period before second-stage transfer ^[3]. Inflation is serial and slow. In a lower-limb burn-sequelae series the average inflation period was 100.5 days ^[23]. Over-expansion to two to three times the rated expander volume is used to gain adequate flap area, with expansion times running several months in extensive-burn series ^[64].

Second-stage transfer and flap design

At the second stage the expander is removed, the scar is excised, and the expanded skin is advanced or transposed into the defect. The advantages of expanded flaps are concrete: large flaps can be harvested because of the expander, extremely thin flaps can be safely employed, texture and color match are good, the donor site can be closed primarily, and microsurgery is not required ^[3]. The cost is the staging itself, since the method requires two or three operations ^[3]. The choice between simple advancement and a designed transposition matters, because expanded local and regional flaps must reach the defect without tension to release the contracture durably ^[3][15].

Pre-expanded and prefabricated flaps

When the deformity is too large for a local advancement, the expander is combined with axial-pattern, perforator, or prefabricated flaps. Flap prefabrication provides an independent axial blood supply to local expanded tissue by implanting a vascular pedicle and allowing neovascularization, and in a ten-year experience 15 of 17 prefabricated flaps transferred successfully in 12 patients, with expanders used as an aid in 11; these flaps were particularly useful in patients recovering from extensive burns where thin donor sites are limited ^[4]. Venous congestion, the main early problem, could be reduced by incorporating a native superficial vein or extending the prefabrication time ^[4]. For total or subtotal facial resurfacing, a pre-expanded, prefabricated supercharged cervicothoracic monoblock perforator flap can resurface extensive facial defects with excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes and acceptable complications, and the authors suggest it may replace skin-only face allotransplantation in selected patients ^[11]. Stem-cell-assisted overexpansion combined with prefabrication has been used to acquire a monoblock flap for full-face resurfacing in massive facial defects ^[12]. For severe cervicofacial contracture, the pre-expanded thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is described as an ideal reconstructive method ^[13]. When the forehead itself is too scarred to serve as a donor, two-stage flaps based on the superficial temporal artery have been developed for facial and nasal reconstruction, providing ample supple skin with the donor site concealed in the periphery of the face ^[18].

Expanded super-thin flaps

A recurring face-and-neck strategy is the expanded super-thin flap, which exploits the capsule-driven thinning of expanded skin. In a series of 21 expanded super-thin flaps for face or neck scar, all flaps survived completely, scar tissue was replaced with normal skin, the flaps did not shrink, and contractures did not recur ^[3]. The preexpanded and prefabricated super-thin skin perforator flap applies a bridging effect to a neighboring axial flap to reconstruct large defects after release of severe neck contracture; in 12 patients all flaps survived with primary healing except one with distal necrosis, and patients achieved good contour with improved neck range of motion ^[14]. The mechanism is enhanced anastomosis between neighboring subdermal plexuses that extends the perfused territory of the flap ^[14].

Neck contracture release

The neck is the most data-rich site for expansion-based contracture release because facial and cervical skin is thin and prone to contracture and color match is critical ^[21][62]. Adequate contracture release is the first component of treatment, after which the released defect is resurfaced with expanded local or regional tissue ^[27]. Multiple expanded regional flaps serve this purpose: the preexpanded supraclavicular artery flap provides thin tissue of good color and texture that is easy to harvest and restores a complete cervical range of motion ^[16]; the expanded lateral thoracic pedicle flap provides a large, thin flap matched to the face and neck with minimal donor-site morbidity ^[15]; and the pre-expanded free anterolateral thigh flap is an option for wide anterior-neck contractures when regional donor areas are also burned ^[17]. Tissue expansion combined with serial Z-plasty has been used for moderate-to-severe contracture adjacent to cervical joints, with all patients healing uneventfully and durable coverage by range-of-motion, SF-36, and Vancouver Scar Scale measures ^[19]. Across a systematic review of post-burn neck contracture flaps, scapular/parascapular and supraclavicular artery flaps were the most frequently reported, with functional outcomes reported in most studies and over 90% of patients achieving near-normal mobility ^[31].

Adjuncts and alternatives

Several refinements address the limitations of the conventional silicone expander. Endoscopic placement uses smaller, more remote incisions to prepare the expander pocket, reducing wound dehiscence risk and permitting earlier inflation ^[54]; across the reviewed literature, comparative studies found significant reductions in seroma, hematoma, and device exposure with endoscopic placement ^[8]. A randomized controlled trial of endoscopic-assisted versus open expander placement for facial burn scars reported a significantly lower complication rate in the endoscopic group ^[9], and a separate series found endoscopic-assisted neck expansion associated with lower complication rate, shorter hospitalization, reduced operative time, and earlier and faster expansion ^[10]. The osmotic self-inflating expander, which does not require external filling, offers benefits in young children, though conventional expanders are still described as the gold standard ^[44]. For lower-volume needs, intraoperative skin stretching after scar excision can close larger defects in a single step, and a randomized controlled trial found a sustained reduction in remaining scar area at 12 months (26% with stretching versus 43% without) without producing wider linear scars or more hypertrophy ^[20]. The expanded full-thickness skin graft is an alternative expansion product, useful for resurfacing problems such as the whole dorsum of the hand with good cosmetic and functional recovery ^[25].

Complications

Tissue expansion carries a relatively high complication rate, and this is its defining limitation rather than an incidental footnote ^[2][40]. Reported complication rates of tissue expansion exceed 40% in some series, and in a face-and-neck cohort the events were complete extrusion (2.6%), incomplete extrusion (3.8%), partial necrosis (14.1%), hematoma (6.4%), wide scar (33.3%), hypertrophic scar (17.9%), and infection (2.6%) ^[21][38]. Infection and expander exposure dominate, and most occur after the first-stage implantation surgery ^[34][65]. In a university-hospital burn-sequelae series, complications occurred in 17.95% of cases with extrusion and infection most common, and complication rates were higher for expanders in the limbs ^[34].

Anatomic site is the strongest determinant. Limb expanders carry markedly higher complication and failure rates than non-limb expanders (30% versus 10% complications and 15% versus 2.5% failure in one comparison), and skin expansion of the lower limb is a difficult procedure with a significant complication rate, with at least one complication in 29.1% of procedures ^[22][23]. Expander volume, female gender, and limb location were identified as significant risk factors, and patients with both high mean arterial pressure and low body mass index developed tissue necrosis significantly more often ^[38]. A separate review identified lower limb, burn etiology, and myelomeningocele as risk factors for premature expander removal in both children and adults ^[41].

Age is the other major axis. Younger age is an independent risk factor for expander complications in pediatric patients ^[37]. In a comparison of pediatric and adult post-burn expansions, complications occurred in 23.8% of pediatric procedures versus 12% of adult procedures, a statistically significant difference, although most complicated cases still completed successful reconstruction ^[35]. Pediatric burn injuries greater than 30% TBSA and the use of an increasing number of expanders were associated with worse postoperative complications, with premature explantation the most common major event ^[36]. Practical risk reduction is reported: betadine skin preparation was associated with a 10% reduction in infection-related complications in a pediatric burn-expander cohort ^[39].

A consistent finding across cohorts is that the diagnosis of burn itself does not appear to elevate complication risk beyond what other expansion indications carry. The complication rate in burn-scar patients is not higher than in patients expanded for other indications, and factors such as age, TBSA, and anatomic site exert more influence than the initial indication ^[38][40].

Special Considerations

Pediatric burn reconstruction

Children are both the population in whom expansion is most often used for burns and the population at highest complication risk. Tissue expansion is widely used to reconstruct soft-tissue defects after pediatric burn injuries with satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes, but younger age is an independent risk factor for complications, and burns greater than 30% TBSA requiring more expanders are associated with worse outcomes ^[36][37]. In an early single-center pediatric burn series, the high complication rate was felt to be specific to the pediatric burn patient ^[46]. Despite this, the technique remains valuable when patients are well selected: across pediatric burn cohorts the child with burns is at no greater risk of expansion complications than other children, and tissue expansion remains a safe and effective pediatric option with acceptable complication rates ^[39][45]. In a pediatric expansion experience the scalp was the most frequently expanded area, and burns and scars were the second most common indication after congenital nevi ^[42]. The osmotic self-inflating expander may have a role in younger children by avoiding repeated percutaneous filling ^[44]. A systematic review of pediatric head-and-neck burn expansion notes that the technique improves matching of skin color and texture and avoids the infrastructure demands of microsurgical free transfer ^[49].

Postburn alopecia and the scalp

The scalp is the prototypical success of burn expansion. Skin expansion has become the standard management of postburn alopecia, providing a large hair-bearing area and significantly improving aesthetic appearance despite a relatively high complication rate ^[2]. Classification of burn alopecia into uniform, segmental, patchy, and total types informs operative planning, and in a large pediatric burn-alopecia series 102 children underwent expander placement for correction ^[47].

Breast, face, and complex units

Burns to the developing female breast carry an additional psychological component, and reconstruction is staged around the growth of the mammary gland ^[50][60]. For pediatric burn reconstruction, the extended lower trapezius myocutaneous flap is a valuable option ^[48]. Where avascular structures or nongraftable wound beds are present, a synthetic dermal matrix can provide biological wound cover that may otherwise require complex distant flap or free tissue transfer, expediting rehabilitation with limited contracture formation ^[51]. Rehabilitation is integral throughout, since prevention of scarring is the aim of burn management and rehabilitation must start from the time of injury ^[52].

Limb reconstruction

The limbs are where expansion is hardest. Although limb expanders carry higher complication and failure rates, the non-significant difference between limb and non-limb expanders at modest statistical power has been used to support continued limb expansion with close follow-up ^[22]. For severe extremity contracture, combining expansion with a muscle flap is one solution: the combined use of tissue expansion and latissimus dorsi transfer for arm-thorax synechia provided the high skin quality of expansion with safe coverage of exposed vital structures and an excellent functional outcome after early intensive rehabilitation ^[5]. For the dorsum of the hand, the expanded full-thickness skin graft repairs whole-dorsum scar contracture with good cosmetic and functional recovery ^[25]. For the posterior heel and Achilles region, where expansion is impractical, a proximally based sural adipose-cutaneous flap is presented as the technique that meets all resurfacing requirements ^[6].

Outcomes

The best-supported outcome of expansion-based reconstruction is durable, like-with-like resurfacing with restored function. In the expanded super-thin flap series for face and neck, all flaps survived, scar was replaced with normal skin, flaps did not shrink, and contractures did not recur ^[3]. Combined expansion-and-muscle-flap reconstruction of arm-thorax synechia produced complete survival of both the expanded skin and the muscle flap with excellent functional outcome and significant aesthetic improvement ^[5]. Combining aesthetic procedures with burn reconstruction has also been used to harvest full-thickness donor skin while minimizing unnecessary donor-site morbidity ^[7]. Across post-burn neck contracture flaps, functional outcomes were reported in most studies, with over 90% of patients achieving near-normal mobility, and aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction were consistently favorable ^[31].

Recurrence after release is the outcome that distinguishes flap-based from graft-based resurfacing, and the comparative evidence favors flaps. Perforator-based interposition flaps maintained significantly greater scar surface area at 12 months than full-thickness grafts (142% versus 92%), with superior results ^[32]. A meta-analysis of microsurgical reconstruction of post-burn joint contracture reported contracture resolution in 98.9% of pedicled and 90.1% of free-flap reconstructions, with recurrence at 1.8% and 0.6% respectively and low flap-loss rates, and found no significant difference in outcomes between pedicled and free flaps ^[30]. The systematic-review signal is therefore that flap-based release achieves low recontracture and low complication rates for joints ^[30].

Process burden is the counterweight. The reconstruction of the burn patient is often a long process requiring multiple procedures ^[2]. Patient-reported outcomes after reconstructive surgery in the rehabilitative period are mixed: scar operations more than six months after injury improved some quality-of-life scores, but contracture operations were not associated with significant differences on the same measures, underscoring that durable function does not always translate into a measured quality-of-life gain ^[29].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps

No consensus on technique selection

The largest gap is the absence of high-quality comparative evidence to decide when to expand rather than graft, flap, or stretch. A systematic review using tissue expansion and serial Z-plasty noted that the approach is especially useful for linear-scar contracture yet difficult for wide scars, illustrating how technique fit is contracture-specific rather than general ^[19]. A systematic review of post-burn neck contracture flaps found that inconsistent use of contracture classification systems and a lack of standardized, objective, and patient-reported outcome measures limit cross-study comparability, and that existing treatment algorithms remain underutilized in practice ^[31]. Reviewers of complication data similarly conclude that careful patient selection is mandatory to avoid complications in tissue expansion ^[38].

Expansion versus the alternatives

Within reconstruction, the role of expansion relative to free tissue transfer and to grafting is contested. Even when free flaps provide good contour and bulk, their poor color match means expanded upper-neck skin may still be needed for the best result, which keeps expansion in the algorithm even where microsurgery is available ^[21]. Island flaps were technically easier to transfer than skin-pedicled flaps but released contractures less effectively, a finding that complicates simple rules about flap selection ^[24]. A systematic review of surgical techniques for burn scar contracture release found that most published series were uncontrolled cohort studies with methodological shortcomings, and that the scarcity and low quality of the evidence prevented definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the different techniques ^[53].

Capsule biology and persistent stiffness

The expander capsule is an underappreciated source of late morbidity. Cervical capsules can persist beyond 24 months after expander removal with stiffness exceeding normal skin and can limit neck mobility, with cord-like capsular contracture attributed to fusion of the deep capsule and platysma ^[33]. How best to manage or prevent persistent capsular stiffness is unsettled, and the same capsule biology is simultaneously exploited to thin transferred flaps, so the capsule is both asset and liability ^[33][59].

Device and method refinements await comparative confirmation

Several refinements are reported as promising but not yet definitively established. Endoscopic placement reduced complications in comparative analyses and in a randomized trial of neck expander placement, but broader adoption awaits confirmation ^[8][9]. The osmotic self-inflating expander offers theoretical pediatric advantages, but conventional expanders are still described as the gold standard ^[44]. A review of local experience frames tissue expansion as a valid solution for large, old post-burn scars with good cosmetic and functional outcomes, while acknowledging the staged time course as its principal drawback ^[26]. The persistent theme is that the technique base is large and clinically mature but the comparative evidence base remains thin ^[19][31].

References

[1] Barret JP. "Burns reconstruction." BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2004. PMID: 15284153 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15284153/ [2] Robson MC, Barnett RA, Leitch IO, Hayward PG. "Prevention and treatment of postburn scars and contracture." World journal of surgery 1992. PMID: 1290271 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1290271/ [3] Gao JH, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, et al. "Reconstruction of the face and neck scar contractures using staged transfer of expanded 'Super-thin flaps'." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2007. PMID: 17521819 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17521819/ [4] Pribaz JJ, Fine N, Orgill DP. "Flap prefabrication in the head and neck: a 10-year experience." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1999. PMID: 10077069 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10077069/ [5] Lykoudis EG, Seretis K, Ziogas DE. "Tissue expansion and latissimus dorsi transfer for arm-thorax synechia reconstruction." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2011. PMID: 21228707 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21228707/ [6] Grishkevich VM. "Proximally based sural adipose-cutaneous/scar flap in elimination of ulcerous scar soft-tissue defect over the achilles tendon and posterior heel region: a new approach." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2014. PMID: 24043244 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24043244/ [7] Shelley OP, Van Niekerk W, Cuccia G, Watson SB. "Dual benefit procedures: combining aesthetic surgery with burn reconstruction." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2006. PMID: 17008010 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17008010/ [8] Manasyan A, Johnson MB. "Endoscopic Tissue Expander Implantation in Postburn Reconstruction: A Review of the Literature." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2024. PMID: 38822556 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38822556/ [9] As'adi K, Emami SA, Salehi SH, Shoar S. "A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Neck Tissue Expander Placement in Reconstruction of Post-Burn Facial Scar Deformities." Aesthetic plastic surgery 2016. PMID: 27178570 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27178570/ [10] As'adi K, Salehi SH, Shoar S, Hashemian SJ, Moradi M. "Endoscopic-assisted neck tissue expansion in reconstruction of facial burn injuries." The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2014. PMID: 24561368 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24561368/ [11] Zan T, Gao Y, Li H, Gu B, Xie F, Li Q. "Pre-expanded, Prefabricated Monoblock Perforator Flap for Total Facial Resurfacing." Clinics in plastic surgery 2017. PMID: 27894577 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27894577/ [12] Li Q, Zan T, Li H, et al. "Flap prefabrication and stem cell-assisted tissue expansion: how we acquire a monoblock flap for full face resurfacing." The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2014. PMID: 24406553 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24406553/ [13] Wang AW, Zhang WF, Liang F, Li JY, Zhang XF, Niu XT. "Pre-expanded thoracodorsal artery perforator-based flaps for repair of severe scarring in cervicofacial regions." Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 2014. PMID: 24683137 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24683137/ [14] Wang C, Zhang J, Yang S, Hyakusoku H, Song P, Pu LL. "The Clinical Application of Preexpanded and Prefabricated Super-Thin Skin Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Post-Burn Neck Contracture." Annals of plastic surgery 2016. PMID: 26954731 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26954731/ [15] Xie F, Li H, Li Q, et al. "Application of the expanded lateral thoracic pedicle flap in face and neck reconstruction." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2013. PMID: 23523225 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23523225/ [16] Sever C, Kulahci Y, Eren F, Sahin C, Yuksel F. "Reconstruction of postburn cervical contractures using expanded supraclavicular artery flap." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2013. PMID: 23702853 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23702853/ [17] Acartürk TO, Bengür FB. "Reconstruction of burn contractures of the anterior neck with pre-expanded free anterolateral thigh flaps." Injury 2020. PMID: 32122624 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32122624/ [18] Venter TH, Parker GR, Rogers AD, Clapham LE, Mende K. "The Africa Temporal Scalp Flap: A Novel Flap for Facial Reconstruction." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 35931056 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35931056/ [19] Song Y, Li Y, Xia C, et al. "Use of Tissue Expansion and Serial Z-plasty for Release of Neck Postburn Scar Contracture." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2019. PMID: 31323100 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31323100/ [20] Verhaegen PD, van der Wal MB, Bloemen MC, et al. "Sustainable effect of skin stretching for burn scar excision: long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2011. PMID: 21726949 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21726949/ [21] Khalatbari B, Bakhshaeekia A. "Ten-year experience in face and neck unit reconstruction using tissue expanders." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2013. PMID: 22975408 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22975408/ [22] Elshahat A. "Management of burn deformities using tissue expanders: a retrospective comparative analysis between tissue expansion in limb and non-limb sites." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2011. PMID: 21168975 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21168975/ [23] Abellan Lopez M, Serror K, Chaouat M, Mimoun M, Boccara D. "Tissue expansion of the lower limb: Retrospective study of 141 procedures in burn sequelae." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 30057336 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30057336/ [24] Yoshino Y, Kubomura K, Ueda H, Tsuge T, Ogawa R. "Extension of flaps associated with burn scar reconstruction: A key difference between island and skin-pedicled flaps." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2018. PMID: 29089205 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29089205/ [25] Liang L, Chai J, Jia X, et al. "[Repair of scar contracture in whole dorsum of hand by expanded full-thickness skin graft]." Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery 2012. PMID: 23230669 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23230669/ [26] Alharbi ZI, Moshref LH, Badr RE, Zahran OA, Almaghrabi MT, Khamis SF. "Post-Burn and Surgical Scar Reconstruction with Tissue Expanders: Review of the Literature and Our Local Experience." Reports (MDPI) 2023. PMID: 40729250 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40729250/ [27] Hudson DA, Renshaw A. "An algorithm for the release of burn contractures of the extremities." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2006. PMID: 16905261 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16905261/ [28] Rea SM, Goodwin-Walters A, Wood FM. "Surgeons and scars: differences between patients and surgeons in the perceived requirement for reconstructive surgery following burn injury." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2006. PMID: 16522354 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16522354/ [29] Sheckter CC, Carrougher GJ, McMullen K, et al. "Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Burn Survivors Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery in the Rehabilitative Period." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2020. PMID: 32590661 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590661/ [30] Elemosho A, Raborn Macdonald LN, Bell DE, Janis JE. "Outcomes of Microsurgical Reconstruction of Post-Burn Joint Contracture-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Microsurgery 2025. PMID: 40817644 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40817644/ [31] Shulkin A, Katz A, Bouhadana G, Izadpanah A, Danino AM, Efanov JI. "Flap reconstruction of post-burn neck contractures: A systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 41110342 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41110342/ [32] Stekelenburg CM, Jaspers MEH, Jongen SJM, et al. "Perforator-Based Interposition Flaps Perform Better Than Full-Thickness Grafts for the Release of Burn Scar Contractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2017. PMID: 28121892 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28121892/ [33] Li R, Cao Z, Yang J, et al. "Biomechanical and histological outcomes of a cervical expander capsule." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40101612 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40101612/ [34] Vana LPM, Lobato RC, Bragagnollo JPF, et al. "Complications using tissue expanders in burn sequelae treatment at a reference university hospital: a retrospective study." Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes 2021. PMID: 34133653 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34133653/ [35] Margulis A, Billig A, Elia J, Shachar Y, Adler N. "Complications of Post-Burn Tissue Expansion Reconstruction: 9 Years Experience with 42 Pediatric and 26 Adult Patients." The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ 2017. PMID: 28457060 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28457060/ [36] Njoroge MW, Hassan B, Bhagwat AM, et al. "Complications Following Tissue Expander-Based Reconstruction in Pediatric Burn Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis." Annals of plastic surgery 2024. PMID: 38556667 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38556667/ [37] Katsushima C, Sowa Y, Sakamoto M, et al. "Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion." Annals of plastic surgery 2024. PMID: 38685492 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38685492/ [38] Smolle C, Tuca A, Wurzer P, et al. "Complications in tissue expansion: A logistic regression analysis for risk factors." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2017. PMID: 28641917 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28641917/ [39] Patel PA, Elhadi HM, Kitzmiller WJ, Billmire DA, Yakuboff KP. "Tissue expander complications in the pediatric burn patient: a 10-year follow-up." Annals of plastic surgery 2014. PMID: 24149411 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24149411/ [40] Fochtmann A, Keck M, Mittlböck M, Rath T. "Tissue expansion for correction of scars due to burn and other causes: a retrospective comparative study of various complications." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2013. PMID: 23276651 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23276651/ [41] Jiang M, Liu X, Li D, Baigong F, Shen C. "Risk factors for complications of tissue expansion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis." Surgery 2025. PMID: 40086105 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086105/ [42] Duquennoy-Martinot V, Depoortère C, Deveaux C, et al. "[Indications of the expansion in pediatric surgery. Experience of 30years and literature review]." Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 2016. PMID: 27423935 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27423935/ [43] Gürlek A, Alaybeyoğlu N, Demir CY, Aydoğan H, Bilen BT, Oztürk A. "Aesthetic reconstruction of large scalp defects by sequential tissue expansion without interval." Aesthetic plastic surgery 2004. PMID: 15599540 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15599540/ [44] Lohana P, Moiemen NS, Wilson YT. "The use of Osmed(TM) tissue expanders in paediatric burns reconstruction." Annals of burns and fire disasters 2012. PMID: 23012614 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23012614/ [45] Iconomou TG, Michelow BJ, Zuker RM. "The relative risk of tissue expansion in the pediatric patient with burns." The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 1993. PMID: 8454667 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8454667/ [46] Neale HW, High RM, Billmire DA, Carey JP, Smith D, Warden G. "Complications of controlled tissue expansion in the pediatric burn patient." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1988. PMID: 3174872 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3174872/ [47] McCauley RL, Oliphant JR, Robson MC. "Tissue expansion in the correction of burn alopecia: classification and methods of correction." Annals of plastic surgery 1990. PMID: 2396817 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2396817/ [48] Zheng XY, Guo X, Wang TL, Wang JQ. "Extended lower trapezius myocutaneous flap in burn scar reconstruction of the face and neck of children." Pediatric surgery international 2011. PMID: 21822656 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21822656/ [49] De La Cruz Monroy MFI, Kalaskar DM, Rauf KG. "Tissue expansion reconstruction of head and neck burn injuries in paediatric patients - A systematic review." JPRAS open 2018. PMID: 32158842 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32158842/ [50] Ogilvie MP, Panthaki ZJ. "Burns of the developing breast." The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2008. PMID: 18650727 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18650727/ [51] Concannon E, Damkat-Thomas L, Rose E, Coghlan P, Solanki N, Wagstaff M. "Use of a Synthetic Dermal Matrix for Reconstruction of 55 Patients with Nongraftable Wounds and Management of Complications." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2023. PMID: 36721959 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36721959/ [52] Edgar D, Brereton M. "Rehabilitation after burn injury." BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2004. PMID: 15297346 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15297346/ [53] Stekelenburg CM, Marck RE, Tuinebreijer WE, de Vet HC, Ogawa R, van Zuijlen PP. "A systematic review on burn scar contracture treatment: searching for evidence." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25051521 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25051521/ [54] Elshaer WM, Enab AA, Elmanawi HM. "Endoscopic tissue expansion placement in face and neck burn scar reconstruction." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2011. PMID: 21131131 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21131131/ [55] Hallock GG. "Tissue expansion techniques in burn reconstruction." Annals of plastic surgery 1987. PMID: 3579165 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3579165/ [56] Takei T, Mills I, Arai K, Sumpio BE. "Molecular basis for tissue expansion: clinical implications for the surgeon." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1998. PMID: 9655439 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9655439/ [57] Foyatier JL, Comparin JP, Masson CL. "[Skin flaps and expanded full-thickness skin grafts. Indications in the repair of burn sequelae]." Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 1996. PMID: 9687609 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9687609/ [58] Lari AR, Gang RK. "Expansion technique for skin grafts (Meek technique) in the treatment of severely burned patients." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2001. PMID: 11164667 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11164667/ [59] Margulis A, Agam K, Icekson M, Dotan L, Yanko-Arzi R, Neuman R. "The expanded supraclavicular flap, prefabricated with thoracoacromial vessels, for reconstruction of postburn anterior cervical contractures." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2007. PMID: 17519702 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17519702/ [60] Chichery A, Voulliaume D, Comparin JP, Foyatier JL. "[Sequelae of burns of the breast and their reconstruction]." Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 2011. PMID: 21889252 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21889252/ [61] Grishkevich VM, Grishkevich M. "Postburn Neck Lateral Contracture Anatomy and Treatment: A New Approach." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2015. PMID: 25501780 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25501780/ [62] Motamed S, Mousavizadeh SM, Niazi F, Khajouei Kermani H, Saberi A, Motamed H. "Lateral lower face and neck contouring following burn injury." Acta medica Iranica 2015. PMID: 25871020 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25871020/ [63] Durgun M, Aksam E. "Choosing the right rectangular expander and maximising the benefits from expanded tissue." Journal of wound care 2019. PMID: 31166861 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31166861/ [64] Zhang W, Xie WG, Zhang WD, Yang F, Chen L. "[Expanded flaps with vascular anastomosis for the treatment of scar contracture deformities of extensively burned patients]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2019. PMID: 31280532 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31280532/ [65] Wang ZT, Dong C, Tang YK, Yu Z, Ma XJ. "[Clinical effect of pre-expanded deltopectoral flap in the repair of faciocervical lesion and defect]." Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns 2020. PMID: 32456373 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32456373/ [66] Luo SS, Li YQ. "Using an Expanded Cervical Flap With an Overlapping Tissue Expansion Technique to Resurface Middle and Lower Facial Defects." The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2023. PMID: 36856445 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36856445/ [67] Chen B, Song H, Gao Q, Xu M. "Pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps for correcting scar contracture in pediatric patients-a retrospective study of 22 cases." Journal of pediatric surgery 2016. PMID: 26777888 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26777888/