Hypertonic saline burn resuscitation

Overview¶

Hypertonic saline resuscitation is a strategy that raises the sodium concentration of the resuscitation fluid above plasma levels so that the early extracellular deficit of burn shock can be corrected with a smaller infused volume. Hypertonic lactated saline, hypertonic saline dextran, and bicarbonate-buffered hypertonic solutions are all variations on the same idea: deliver the sodium the patient needs without the accompanying free water that drives edema. The concept dominated a productive era of burn resuscitation research from the late 1970s through the 1990s, anchored by Monafo and by Caldwell and Bowser-Wallace, and it generated a body of animal and clinical work on volume sparing, edema, cardiac function, and the inflammatory response ^[4,5].

The modern reality is that this modality has largely receded from clinical practice. The enduring goal it was built to serve, supporting organ perfusion with the least amount of fluid necessary and the least physiologic cost, remains central to burn resuscitation ^[30]. A 1995 cohort by Huang and colleagues reported that patients resuscitated with hypertonic sodium had a fourfold increase in renal failure and twice the mortality of patients given lactated Ringer, and that report reshaped how the field views the technique ^[1]. International surveys now place hypertonic saline use at a few percent of burn centers ^[22,23]. This page covers the sodium-load rationale, the formulations and dosing studied, the volume-sparing evidence and where it held up, the renal-failure and hypernatremia controversy, and the current, largely historical and selective, role of the technique.

Physiologic rationale¶

The case for a high sodium load rests on how burn shock distributes fluid. In hypertonic lactated saline therapy, the maintained sodium gradient kept sufficient functional extracellular fluid volume during the shock period and limited the excessive rise in that volume afterward, in contrast to isotonic sodium regimens ^[6]. Belba framed the mechanism directly: rapid infusion of a high sodium concentration, around 250 mEq/L, reduces fluid shifts, decreases tissue edema, and is described as causing fewer attendant complications ^[3]. Jelenko's HALFD work argued that much of the salt, fluid, and colloid loss into the interstitium during resuscitation reflects the rate and physical nature of the fluid given rather than capillary damage outside the zone of injury, which is the conceptual basis for delivering sodium in a smaller, more concentrated volume ^[7].

Animal work fills in the downstream effects. In a rat burn model, hypertonic saline at less than one-fifth the volume of lactated Ringer produced rapid improvement in organ tissue perfusion, with blood flow to the brain and kidney rising 39% and 42% ^[34]. Hypertonic saline dextran maintained a 3 to 5 mm Hg higher plasma colloid osmotic pressure than lactated Ringer in sheep, and the early volume-sparing effect and reduction in tissue edema were attributed to increased extracellular osmolarity and better preservation of plasma oncotic pressure ^[12]. Beyond hemodynamics, hypertonic saline dextran decreased cardiomyocyte secretion of inflammatory cytokines and improved ventricular function after burn in rats, which the investigators read as cytokine-mediated cardioprotection ^[19]. A parallel line of work found that hypertonic saline enhanced host defense to bacterial challenge by augmenting Toll-like receptors and increasing bacterial clearance and phagocytic activity ^[18]. These mechanistic signals are consistent and largely favorable in the laboratory; the gap between them and clinical outcome is the central tension of the topic.

Formulations and dosing¶

Several distinct formulations appear in the burn literature. Hypertonic lactated saline regimens concentrate sodium to roughly 250 mEq/L. Gunn's randomized trial used hypertonic saline at 250 mEq/L and 514 mOsm against lactated Ringer at 130 mEq/L and 268 mOsm ^[2]. Belba's clinical protocol gave hypertonic lactated saline in the first hour at a volume of 0.5 times the percentage total body surface area times body weight in kilograms, then titrated, noting that the regimen demands careful observation and calculation ^[3]. Monafo's concentrated-sodium approach targeted hourly urine output in the range of 0.5 to 1 mL/kg with monitoring of urinary sodium excretion ^[4].

Hypertonic saline dextran combines 7.5% sodium chloride with 6% dextran. In a 48-hour conscious-sheep study, Elgjo and colleagues found that an initial 4 mL/kg dose of hypertonic saline dextran reduced fluid requirements early, and that two separate 4 mL/kg doses generally avoided the net fluid loss and rebound requirement seen with a single 8 mL/kg dose ^[11]. That study concluded the volume-sparing effect depends on all of dose, dosing interval, and infusion rate, and that an 8 mL/kg continuously infused initial dose produced no prolonged sparing ^[11]. Bicarbonate-buffered and "slightly hypertonic" combinations also appear: Juern's series used lactated Ringer with 50 mEq sodium bicarbonate and potassium phosphate plus dextran-40 in methamphetamine burn patients ^[24]. Across formulations, serum sodium and osmolarity monitoring is described as necessary to adjust the sodium concentration of administered fluid ^[37].

Volume-sparing evidence¶

The most reproducible finding across the literature is early volume sparing. In Shimazaki's hypertonic lactated saline series, total infusion volume during the first 48 hours was only one-half to two-thirds of that in the isotonic sodium group despite nearly equal sodium loads ^[6]. Jelenko's hypertonic albumin-containing regimen required significantly smaller fluid volumes with more rapid normalization of physiologic and biochemical parameters ^[7]. In burned children, those resuscitated with hypertonic lactated saline required about 23% less fluid in the first 24 hours, and the 24- and 48-hour requirements were significantly greater with Ringer-colloid than with hypertonic lactated saline ^[8,36]. The sheep work quantified the same effect under controlled conditions: hypertonic saline dextran-treated animals needed 43 plus or minus 19 mL/kg versus 194 plus or minus 38 mL/kg for lactated Ringer to restore oxygen delivery ^[12].

The evidence is not uniform. The Huang cohort found that although first-24-hour volumes were lower with hypertonic sodium (3.9 versus 5.3 mL/kg/%BSA), by 48 hours cumulative fluid loads were similar and the total sodium load was greater, and the authors concluded hypertonic sodium did not reduce the total resuscitation volume required ^[1]. Gunn's randomized trial was unable to demonstrate decreased fluid requirements, improved tolerance of feedings, or a reduction in percent weight gain, and reported no advantage of hypertonic saline over conventional lactated Ringer ^[2]. The honest reading is that hypertonic saline reliably spares volume in the first 8 to 12 hours, but that the early deficit is often repaid later, and a controlled trial did not confirm a net volume benefit.

Comparative and adjunctive evidence¶

Hypertonic saline sits inside a longstanding debate over the merits of colloid versus crystalloid for the resuscitation of major burns ^[35]. Carvajal and Parks compared candidate resuscitation fluids and found that lactated Ringer with albumin restored cardiac output to preburn values, avoided electrolyte and acid-base imbalance, kept serum osmolality normal, and uniquely did not induce edema in unburned tissues, which led them to favor that solution over hypertonic alternatives ^[13]. A more recent line of Chinese rat work using moderate sodium loads (200 to 400 mEq/L) reported organ-protective signals: 200 mEq/L hypertonic saline decreased the lung wet-to-dry ratio, prevented burn-induced hyponatremia, and attenuated oxidative stress, though it did not inhibit the systemic inflammatory response ^[14]. A 400 mEq/L solution reduced renal water content, improved renal histopathology, lowered serum creatinine, and decreased inflammatory mediators in a rat kidney-injury model ^[15].

Clinical hemodynamic data are mixed but lean modestly positive on cardiac measures. Murphy and colleagues found that early hypertonic saline dextran after severe thermal injury may reduce burn-related cardiac dysfunction, but it had no effect on resuscitation volume or serum biochemistry ^[20]. Belba's comparative work confirmed that hypertonic resuscitation gives a higher fluid and sodium load in the first hour, accompanied by a decrease in fluid requirements and fluid accumulation over the first 24 hours ^[32].

Complications¶

The complication that defines this topic is renal. In the Huang cohort, patients resuscitated with hypertonic sodium had a fourfold increase in renal failure (40.0% versus 10.1%) and twice the mortality of lactated Ringer patients (53.8% versus 26.6%), with renal failure an independent risk factor on logistic regression, and the authors stated that the use of hypertonic sodium for burn resuscitation may be ill advised ^[1]. Serum sodium concentrations in that series were moderately elevated through the first three days (153 versus 135 mEq/L) ^[1]. Hypernatremia and a rapid shift of extracellular water into the intracellular space were recognized as clinical problems with hypertonic lactated saline as early as Shimazaki's work ^[6]. Patanwala notes that a principal concern with hypertonic saline is central pontine myelinolysis from a rapid rise in serum sodium ^[21].

Animal work surfaces a more specific hazard. Chen and colleagues showed that restoring extracellular fluid in early burn shock with hypertonic saline markedly augmented burn-induced lung neutrophil deposition, hyperpermeability, and blood peroxynitrite production, and separately worsened intestinal mucosa lipid peroxidation, neutrophil sequestration, permeability, and villi sloughing ^[16,17]. In both organs, inhibiting inducible nitric oxide synthase before the hypertonic saline reversed the deteriorating effects, which led those investigators to conclude that using hypertonic saline in thermal injury without iNOS inhibition is dangerous ^[16]. A counterweight is the abdominal compartment syndrome literature: Oda found that hypertonic lactated saline lowered peak intra-abdominal pressure and reduced the risk of secondary abdominal compartment syndrome with a lower fluid load, since large intravenous volumes themselves raise intra-abdominal pressure ^[10]. The complication profile is therefore bidirectional, lowering fluid-volume-driven compartment syndrome while raising hypernatremia, renal, and organ-specific inflammatory risks.

Special considerations¶

Pediatric and geriatric series form much of the favorable clinical record. Monafo reported that burn shock in infants and children is satisfactorily treated by initial intravenous balanced hypertonic sodium solutions, with a principal advantage of minimizing alarming acute weight gain ^[37]. Caldwell and Bowser-Wallace concluded that severely burned children may be resuscitated with conventional salt loads and roughly one-third less than the usual water load ^[5]. Indexing matters in young children: requirements differed by age when calculated by body weight but not when calculated by body surface area ^[36]. In adults over 60 with burns of at least 30% body surface area, hypertonic lactated saline resuscitation was reported as safe and efficacious, with 81% survival of that severely compromised group, although a normal cardiac index and wedge pressure may not be the right endpoint in the elderly on this regimen ^[9].

The technique also has a niche in austere and military settings, where the logistic constraints of combat casualty care can make large crystalloid volumes impractical, and where volume-sparing strategies can sustain life until definitive therapy even if they do not reduce morbidity or mortality ^[31]. In methamphetamine burn patients, a population reported to need two to three times the standard Parkland volume, Juern's slightly hypertonic regimen produced no difference in the ratio of actual to predicted fluid and no difference in intubation, ventilator days, length of stay, or deaths ^[24].

Current role¶

Hypertonic saline now occupies a small and contested place. In the ISBI/ABA survey, lactated Ringer was the preferred solution at 91.9% with hypertonic saline at 4%, and Boldt's European survey reported that gelatins, dextrans, and hypertonic saline are used only very rarely ^[22,23]. ABA guidance, as summarized by Patanwala, suggests hypertonic saline may be used for burn shock resuscitation by experienced providers with close monitoring to avoid excessive hypernatremia ^[21]. In the broader trauma literature, a Cochrane review found no evidence that hypertonic crystalloids outperform isotonic crystalloids, two adequately powered mortality trials were halted for futility, and Patanwala concluded there is no evidence of added benefit over isotonic solutions ^[21]. Berger observed that hypertonic saline solutions, with or without dextran, showed no advantage over classic Ringer lactate ^[26].

The most recent direct test points away from hypertonic resuscitation. After the Dutch Burn Society revised its guideline in 2018 from 4 mL/kg/TBSA hypertonic solution to 3 mL/kg/TBSA isotonic solution, Gigengack and colleagues compared the two protocols in 108 adults and found no significant difference in renal function, renal replacement therapy, urinary output, acute kidney injury, or mortality, concluding that reducing volume and switching to isotonic fluid showed no adverse renal effects ^[27]. Contemporary attention has shifted toward oral and enteral routes: a teprenone oral rehydration solution improved 72-hour survival over WHO oral rehydration solution in a burn model, while a parallel bibliometric and animal screen reported that hypertonic saline failed to demonstrate efficacy among candidate oral-rehydration enhancers ^[28,29].

Controversies and Evidence Gaps¶

The central controversy is whether the volume-sparing benefit is worth the sodium-load risk. The Huang renal-failure and mortality signal anchors the conservative position ^[1], while Gunn's randomized trial simply found no advantage ^[2]; together they explain why enthusiasm faded. The animal record is more favorable than the clinical record, and Carvajal's finding that lactated Ringer with albumin avoided the electrolyte disturbances of hypertonic solutions while still sparing unburned-tissue edema gave the field a colloid-based alternative that addressed the same problem ^[13]. The iNOS-dependent lung and gut injury seen with hypertonic saline in rats raises the possibility that the technique is only safe under conditions not routinely met at the bedside ^[16,17].

Several gaps remain genuinely open. No adequately powered modern randomized trial in burns has settled whether any patient subgroup, such as those approaching a volume ceiling or at risk of abdominal compartment syndrome, gains a net benefit from hypertonic over isotonic fluid; Azzopardi's systematic review supports volume reduction through colloids or hypertonic saline near a volume ceiling, but the evidence base is thin ^[25]. The optimal sodium concentration is unsettled, with rat data suggesting an intermediate concentration may protect organs better than the highest loads ^[14,15]. Belba's report of acceptable outcomes with a carefully monitored hypertonic lactated saline protocol stands against the Huang signal, and the difference may lie in monitoring discipline rather than the fluid itself ^[3,1]. Finally, the long-term hazard of induced hypernatremia on the burn wound is suggested by animal data showing fewer surviving hair follicles under hypernatremic conditions, but its clinical significance is unquantified ^[33]. The Dutch 2025 comparison is the strongest recent signal, and it found no renal cost to leaving hypertonic resuscitation behind ^[27].

References¶

[1] Huang PP, Stucky FS, Dimick AR, et al. "Hypertonic sodium resuscitation is associated with renal failure and death." Annals of surgery 1995. PMID: 7748036 ↩

[2] Gunn ML, Hansbrough JF, Davis JW, et al. "Prospective, randomized trial of hypertonic sodium lactate versus lactated Ringer's solution for burn shock resuscitation." The Journal of trauma 1989. PMID: 2671402 ↩

[3] Belba M. "Our experience in the treatment of burn shock by hypertonic lactated saline solution." Annals of burns and fire disasters 2005. PMID: 21990980 ↩

[4] Monafo WW, Halverson JD, Schechtman K. "The role of concentrated sodium solutions in the resuscitation of patients with severe burns." Surgery 1984. PMID: 6695329 ↩

[5] Caldwell FT, Bowser BH. "Critical evaluation of hypertonic and hypotonic solutions to resuscitate severely burned children: a prospective study." Annals of surgery 1979. PMID: 36048 ↩

[6] Shimazaki S, Yoshioka T, Tanaka N, et al. "Body fluid changes during hypertonic lactated saline solution therapy for burn shock." The Journal of trauma 1977. PMID: 833904 ↩

[7] Jelenko C, Williams JB, Wheeler ML, et al. "Studies in shock and resuscitation, I: use of a hypertonic, albumin-containing, fluid demand regimen (HALFD) in resuscitation." Critical care medicine 1979. PMID: 446052 ↩

[8] Bowser-Wallace BH, Caldwell FT. "A prospective analysis of hypertonic lactated saline v. Ringer's lactate-colloid for the resuscitation of severely burned children." Burns, including thermal injury 1986. PMID: 3768752 ↩

[9] Bowser-Wallace BH, Cone JB, Caldwell FT. "Hypertonic lactated saline resuscitation of severely burned patients over 60 years of age." The Journal of trauma 1985. PMID: 3965735 ↩

[10] Oda J, Ueyama M, Yamashita K, et al. "Hypertonic lactated saline resuscitation reduces the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely burned patients." The Journal of trauma 2006. PMID: 16456437 ↩

[11] Elgjo GI, Traber DL, Hawkins HK, et al. "Burn resuscitation with two doses of 4 mL/kg hypertonic saline dextran provides sustained fluid sparing: a 48-hour prospective study in conscious sheep." The Journal of trauma 2000. PMID: 10963536 ↩

[12] Kinsky MP, Milner SM, Button B, et al. "Resuscitation of severe thermal injury with hypertonic saline dextran: effects on peripheral and visceral edema in sheep." The Journal of trauma 2000. PMID: 11086774 ↩

[13] Carvajal HF, Parks DH. "Optimal composition of burn resuscitation fluids." Critical care medicine 1988. PMID: 3371046 ↩

[14] Sun YX, Wu XS, Gao Z, et al. "Effect of 200 mEq/L Na+ hypertonic saline resuscitation on systemic inflammatory response and oxidative stress in severely burned rats." The Journal of surgical research 2013. PMID: 23880649 ↩

[15] Yuan CY, Wang QC, Chen XL, et al. "Hypertonic saline resuscitation protects against kidney injury induced by severe burns in rats." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2019. PMID: 30327229 ↩

[16] Chen LW, Hwang B, Chang WJ, et al. "Inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor reverses exacerbating effects of hypertonic saline on lung injury in burn." Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 2004. PMID: 15489641 ↩

[17] Chen LW, Hwang B, Wang JS, et al. "Hypertonic saline-enhanced postburn gut barrier failure is reversed by inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibition." Critical care medicine 2004. PMID: 15599154 ↩

[18] Chen LW, Huang HL, Lee IT, et al. "Hypertonic saline enhances host defense to bacterial challenge by augmenting Toll-like receptors." Critical care medicine 2006. PMID: 16625117 ↩

[19] Horton JW, Maass DL, White J, et al. "Hypertonic saline-dextran suppresses burn-related cytokine secretion by cardiomyocytes." American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2001. PMID: 11247769 ↩

[20] Murphy JT, Horton JW, Purdue GF, et al. "Cardiovascular effect of 7.5% sodium chloride-dextran infusion after thermal injury." Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) 1999. PMID: 10522853 ↩

[21] Patanwala AE, Amini A, Erstad BL. "Use of hypertonic saline injection in trauma." American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2010. PMID: 21048208 ↩

[22] Greenhalgh DG. "Burn resuscitation: the results of the ISBI/ABA survey." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2010. PMID: 20018451 ↩

[23] Boldt J, Papsdorf M. "Fluid management in burn patients: results from a European survey-more questions than answers." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2008. PMID: 18201828 ↩

[24] Juern J, Peltier G, Twomey J. "Slightly hypertonic saline and dextran-40 in resuscitation of methamphetamine burn patients." Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association 2008. PMID: 18354288 ↩

[25] Azzopardi EA, McWilliams B, Iyer S, et al. "Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe burns at risk of secondary abdominal compartment syndrome--an evidence based systematic review." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2009. PMID: 19477594 ↩

[26] Berger MM, Bernath MA, Chioléro RL. "Resuscitation, anaesthesia and analgesia of the burned patient." Current opinion in anaesthesiology 2001. PMID: 17019126 ↩

[27] Gigengack RK, Dijkstra A, Cleffken BI, et al. "Renal function after severe burn trauma - effects of reducing resuscitation fluid volume and changing fluid tonicity." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40829232 ↩

[28] Liu XY, Wu YS, Chai JK, et al. "Preliminary exploration of efficacy assessment and optimal concentration of teprenone oral rehydration solution for the early management of post-burn shock." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 2025. PMID: 40651116 ↩

[29] Liu XY, Wu YS, Qu YR, et al. "Bibliometric analysis and initial animal efficacy evaluation of top ten scoring drugs to enhance oral rehydration therapy in early post-burn shock." Frontiers in pharmacology 2025. PMID: 40900826 ↩

[30] Endorf FW, Dries DJ. "Burn resuscitation." Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2011. PMID: 22078326 ↩

[31] Thomas SJ, Kramer GC, Herndon DN. "Burns: military options and tactical solutions." The Journal of trauma 2003. PMID: 12768127 ↩

[32] Belba MK, Petrela EY, Belba GP. "Comparison of hypertonic vs isotonic fluids during resuscitation of severely burned patients." The American journal of emergency medicine 2009. PMID: 19931756 ↩

[33] Harada T, Izaki S, Tsutsumi H, et al. "Apoptosis of hair follicle cells in the second-degree burn wound under hypernatremic conditions." Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 1998. PMID: 9725689 ↩

[34] Kien ND, Antognini JF, Reilly DA, et al. "Small-volume resuscitation using hypertonic saline improves organ perfusion in burned rats." Anesthesia and analgesia 1996. PMID: 8831321 ↩

[35] Hemington-Gorse SJ. "Colloid or crystalloid for resuscitation of major burns." Journal of wound care 2005. PMID: 15974411 ↩

[36] Bowser-Wallace BH, Caldwell FT. "Fluid requirements of severely burned children up to 3 years old: hypertonic lactated saline vs. Ringer's lactate-colloid." Burns, including thermal injury 1986. PMID: 3454687 ↩

[37] Monafo WW, Robinson HN. "The treatment of burned children." Clinics in plastic surgery 1977. PMID: 334445 ↩